US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 148 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00685
Dell and AX Wireless jointly moved to terminate the IPR over patent 10,079,707, citing a settlement and the Board’s lack of merit decision. The motion invokes 35 U.S.C. §317 and requests confidentiality for the settlement documents.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-00784
Google and Proxense settled their dispute, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPR over Proxense’s Bluetooth proximity patent.
patent denied
Toyota Motor Corp. et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-00785
Toyota and Kia’s attempt to obtain Director review of an IPR against Emerging Automotive was rejected. The Board held the request unauthorized under 37 C.F.R. §42.75(c) and affirmed its earlier denial of institution. The brief also urges denial of other pending IPRs between the parties.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00735
Samsung seeks Director review of the PTAB’s Final Written Decision finding Maxell’s claims unpatentable, arguing the Board ignored Samsung’s narrow “character” construction used in a district‑court jury trial. The Board denied the request, leaving the unpatentability findings in place.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00735
Maxell seeks Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against Samsung’s home‑networking patent, arguing the Board misapplied discretionary denial standards and ignored key Fintiv factors.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00735
Maxell challenges the PTAB’s decision to institute Samsung’s IPR over its video‑management patent, alleging procedural abuse and improper burden shifting. The request seeks Director review to overturn the institution.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00682
Dell and AX Wireless jointly moved to terminate IPR 2024-00682 after reaching a settlement and filing a joint stipulation for dismissal in the Eastern District of Texas.
patent
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00733
Dyson and Omachron have settled the IPR challenge to U.S. Patent 10,327,607 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00680
Dell and AX Wireless jointly moved to terminate IPR 2024-00680 concerning patent 9,614,566 after reaching a settlement, filing a joint stipulation for dismissal in the Eastern District of Texas.
patent
AT&T Corp et al. v.Daingean Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00730
Daingean Technologies Ltd. opposes AT&T and other petitioners’ IPR request on U.S. Patent 11,196,509, asserting that the cited Lee and Zheng references fail to teach the patent’s specific code‑block sizing and grouping features, and that the petition relies on hindsight.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00733
Dyson and Omachron settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,327,607 B2, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review by joint motion.
patent
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00733
Dyson and Omachron have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,327,607 and filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy reasons to end the proceeding.
patent
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00708
Dell and AX Wireless have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate their inter partes review after reaching a settlement and filing a joint dismissal in district court.
patent
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00732
Cala Health and EMKinetics filed a joint request asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317, citing competitive harm if disclosed. The Board has yet to rule on the request.
patent
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00732
The PTAB issued an order granting Cala Health and EMKinetics' joint request to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c), separating it from the IPR file.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00734
Lionra Technologies has filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s finding that its dynamic ACL patent claims are obvious. The company alleges procedural violations and improper claim construction based on a late‑filed dictionary definition.
patent
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Pictometry International Corp. et al.
· IPR2024-00729
Nearmap filed a Director Review request after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against Pictometry’s aerial imaging patent. The petitioner claims the Board misapplied rules on claim‑chart format, expert declaration length, and claim construction. Nearmap seeks remand to a new panel to evaluate its obviousness and anticipation arguments.
patent terminated or settled
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00732
The PTAB issued an order compelling Cala Health and EMKinetics to file a true copy of their settlement agreement before the joint motion to dismiss can be acted upon, emphasizing compliance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). A dissenting judge argues the rule does not apply pre‑institution.
patent denied
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Pictometry International Corp. et al.
· IPR2024-00729
The PTAB denied Nearmap's request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2024-00729, leaving the IPR uninstated.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00680
Dell and AX Wireless settled eight inter partes review proceedings covering wireless patents. The Board granted joint motions to terminate the IPRs and treated the settlement agreements as confidential.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.EyesMatch Ltd.
· IPR2024-00810
Samsung and EyesMatch have filed a joint motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory provisions. The request cites 35 U.S.C. §327 and related CFR rules.
patent
ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al. v.Foras Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00727
ZF Friedrichshafen, its affiliates, and Nissan have jointly moved to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and to withdraw the IPR against Foras Technologies’ U.S. Patent 7,502,958.
patent
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00794
Micron seeks a PTAB Director Review of Yangtze Memory’s patent (IPR2024-00794). The Director will decide on the request, and Yangtze may file a limited response within five business days.
patent
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00680
Dell Inc. and AX Wireless have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate their inter partes review, citing a settlement and a joint dismissal stipulation. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
