US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 235 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
Cisco Systems filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Lionra Technologies' U.S. Patent 7,738,471 covering high‑speed packet processing. The petition alleges obviousness over multiple pre‑AIA references and argues that discretionary denial is improper.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01349
Samsung seeks an IPR to invalidate 13 claims of a media‑measurement patent owned by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, arguing obviousness over Steuer and Neumeier references and lack of written‑description support for video‑data features.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01350
Samsung seeks IPR review of U.S. Patent 10,719,848 covering media‑measurement methods, arguing all 15 claims are obvious over prior art and lack written‑description support for video‑data features.
patent null · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies has initiated an IPR challenging the patentability of barocaloric cooling and heating agents held by Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al. The petition asserts that the challenged claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art, including Xie, Mañosa, and Patel.
patent instituted · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING successfully petitioned the PTAB, leading to institution of IPR proceedings against Feit Electric Company, Inc. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on multiple combinations of prior art references regarding LED lighting technology.
patent denied · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01349
Samsung Electronics' attempt to invalidate claims in the '849 patent failed at the PTAB. The Board denied institution, finding that the patent owner successfully established priority dating back to 2005, rendering the cited prior art ineffective against the challenged claims.
patent denied · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01350
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s attempt to invalidate Anonymous Media Research Holdings' content identification patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that the patent description sufficiently broad to cover video data samples, defeating the obviousness challenge over prior art references.
patent instituted · Aug 26, 2024
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
The PTAB granted institution for an IPR challenging Garmin's patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on prior art anticipation and obviousness arguments against the '394 patent.
patent instituted · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
Cisco Systems successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Lionra Technologies regarding patent 7,738,471, challenging claims related to high-speed packet header processing.
patent instituted · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies successfully secured institution of its Inter Partes Review (IPR) against the '656 patent, challenging claims related to barocaloric cooling agents. The Board adopted a broad interpretation of 'organic material,' supporting the Petitioner's argument that the claimed invention is unpatentable over prior art references like Mañosa and Patel.
patent final · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
The PTAB found the claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 because they were obvious in light of prior art references (Cornett, Paatela, Nelson, Russell). The Board adopted a construction of 'concurrently writing' that aligned with both parties and district court precedent. Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the combination of disclosures taught all limitations of the claims for high-speed packet processing.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01343
TikTok seeks Director review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against a media‑feed aggregation patent, alleging the board’s reasoning conflicts with earlier instituted petitions and misinterprets the Whitehead prior art.
patent denied · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
TikTok’s Director Review request to invalidate a media‑aggregation patent was denied. The Board found TikTok’s claim mappings incoherent and noted the introduction of new, unauthorized arguments.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
TikTok has petitioned the PTAB Director to review a panel's denial of institution for its challenge to a media‑feed aggregation patent, arguing the board’s reasoning conflicts with earlier decisions on identical claims.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01310
Genius Sports opposes SportsCastr’s request for Director Review, contending the Board properly analyzed the webserver limitation and that PANDA’s arguments were waived. The Board’s decision should stand and the request be denied.
patent denied · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01343
The USPTO denied TikTok's request for Director Review of the institution decisions in two IPRs involving NTECH's patents, leaving the institution denials in place.
patent denied · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
TikTok’s request for a Director Review of the USPTO’s decision to deny institution of its IPR against NTECH Properties was denied. The Board affirmed the original institution denial, leaving the patent challenge unresolved.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01310
The PTAB Director has issued a Director Review request for IPR2024-01310. Genius Sports Ltd. must submit a concise response within five business days, and no new evidence may be introduced.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01343
Court decision.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01310
SportsCastr requests Director Review of a PTAB decision that found claims 1‑11 of its video‑streaming patent unpatentable. The Owner asserts the Board ignored the “webserver” limitation, an error that warrants reversal.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01343
TikTok has requested Director Review of two IPRs involving NTECH’s patent 9,923,947. The Board limited the Patent Owner’s response to five pages and a five‑day deadline, prohibiting new evidence.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
An email from the PTAB Director informs TikTok and NTECH Properties that Director Review requests for IPR2024-01341 and IPR2024-01343 have been received, setting a five‑business‑day deadline for a brief response and prohibiting new evidence.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
TikTok has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all ten claims of NTECH's 9,215,261 patent on personalized media programming, arguing obviousness over Whitehead, Cristofalo, and Marcus ’904 references.
patent · Aug 23, 2024
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01343
TikTok has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate NTECH's U.S. Patent 9,923,947 covering custom media programming. The petition relies on three § 103 obviousness grounds using Whitehead, Marcus ’904, and Cristofalo references. The Board is asked to institute the review.
