US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 235 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent instituted · Jan 19, 2024
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00477
The PTAB granted institution in this IPR petition filed by Valve Corporation against Immersion Corporation, covering claims related to Haptic Feedback/Tactile Sensing. The Board found that the prior art references (Komata, Tsuji, Rosenberg) sufficiently disclosed or suggested the challenged limitations under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. This decision moves the case toward trial, affirming the Petitioner's reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent instituted · Jan 19, 2024
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00478
Valve Corporation successfully secured institution at the PTAB regarding claims of Immersion Corporation's vibrotactile feedback patent (9430042). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing based on anticipation and obviousness grounds. This decision moves the dispute toward trial in district court.
patent final · Jan 19, 2024
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00477
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all 7 challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,336,260 unpatentable. The decision hinged on the Petitioner's successful anticipation challenge over the prior art reference Komata.
patent final · Jan 19, 2024
Apple, Inc. v.THL Holding Company, LLC
· IPR2024-00399
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding claims 11-19 unpatentable over combinations of prior art references. The Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the combination of Kalliola and other references taught or suggested multiple limitations, particularly regarding UWB DoA and location tracking. This decision significantly weakens the patent's validity in the device location/ranging space.
