US PTAB IP Litigation

8,722 annotated decisions

8,722
Decisions
1
IP Types
0
Courts
Browse by type: patent 8,722

Page 1 of 364 · 8,722 total

patent · Jul 4, 2026

Wealth, Inc. v.--

· PGR2026-00042

Wealth, Inc. has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition seeking cancellation of all 20 claims of Vanilla Technologies’ U.S. Patent 12,353,917, alleging ineligibility, obviousness, indefiniteness, and an improper dependent claim. The petition relies on prior‑art references Racanelli, Bateman, Dintenfass, McMillen and Kwak.

patent · Jul 4, 2026

Toyota Motor Corporation et al. v.BUNKER HILL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

· IPR2026-00333

Toyota has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 17 claims of Bunker Hill’s ’508 hybrid‑drive patent, alleging anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition relies on a technical expert declaration and argues no secondary considerations exist.

patent · Jul 4, 2026

Microsoft Corporation v.Qomplx LLC

· IPR2026-00325

Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging 16 claims of Qomplx’s U.S. Patent 12,301,627 covering graph‑based network anomaly detection. The challenger asserts obviousness over prior‑art references Stokes, Crabtree, and Sekar under 35 U.S.C. §103.

patent · Jul 3, 2026

Microsoft Corporation v.ToutVirtual, Inc.

· IPR2026-00297

Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of ToutVirtual’s ‘667 patent covering virtual system management, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.

patent · Jul 1, 2026

Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Golden Eye Technologies LLC

· IPR2026-00188

Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate five claims of Golden Eye's 9,271,243 patent covering WLAN transmit‑power adjustment. The challenger relies on prior‑art references Hills, Wang and Calhoun to argue obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103.

patent · Jul 1, 2026

Cisco Systems, Inc. v.GOLDEN EYE TECHNOLOGIES LLC

· IPR2026-00187

Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑3 and 13‑15 of Golden Eye Technologies' 9,717,037 patent. The challenger argues the claims are obvious over earlier Wi‑Fi standards and patents (Choudhary, Hasty, Chen). The petition requests the Board to institute the review and cancel the challenged claims.

patent · Jul 1, 2026

Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Golden Eye Technologies LLC

· IPR2026-00186

Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑4 and 9‑11 of Golden Eye’s ’556 Wi‑Fi scanning patent, arguing that the claims are obvious over three earlier patents. The petition emphasizes that the patent was allowed despite acknowledging the same prior‑art concepts.

patent · Jun 4, 2026

Pinterest, Inc. v.--

· IPR2026-00334

Pinterest has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of OpenTV’s ’703 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior art such as Orr, Hsu, Lim, and Hervey.

patent · Jun 4, 2026

Okta, Inc., et al. v.--

· IPR2026-00327

Okta has filed an Inter Partes Review petition challenging all sixteen claims of Thales’s ’103 patent covering security policies for eID wallets on mobile devices. The petition relies on multiple obviousness grounds using prior‑art references such as Makhotin, Coulomb, Jones and others.

patent · Jun 3, 2026

Microsoft Corporation v.ToutVirtual, Inc.

· IPR2026-00295

Microsoft files an IPR petition challenging ToutVirtual’s 2023 ‘Virtual Systems Management’ patent, asserting that all 14 claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art virtualization references.

patent · Jun 3, 2026

Google LLC v.AccuSearch Technologies LLC

· IPR2026-00286

Google filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 25 claims of AccuSearch’s ’959 patent covering annotated search‑result displays, arguing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.

patent · Jun 2, 2026

LG Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.--

· PGR2026-00028

LG Display has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition challenging U.S. Patent 12,293,691 covering an OLED display device. The petition asserts indefiniteness, lack of written description, lack of enablement, and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The Board has not yet ruled on the petition.

patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00282

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑22 of SoftView’s ’729 patent, alleging they are obvious over prior‑art handheld browsers (Zaurus, Pad++) and SVG standards, with claim 21 also relying on SVF. The petition invokes estoppel and issue preclusion based on earlier PTAB findings for related patents.

patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00281

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑35 of SoftView’s ’154 patent, asserting obviousness over Zaurus, Pad++, SVG and SVF prior art and arguing that the claims are patentably indistinct from already invalidated claims in related patents.

patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00283

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑37 of SoftView’s ’628 patent, asserting obviousness over Zaurus, Pad++, and SVG references and arguing the claims are indistinct from already invalidated claims in related patents.

patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00284

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 115 claims of SoftView’s ’889 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over Zaurus, Pad++, and SVG references and are indistinct from previously cancelled claims in related patents.

patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

Verizon Wireless and Fractus have settled the IPR concerning U.S. Patent 11,031,677, filing a joint motion to terminate the proceeding. The Board is asked to end the review under statutory authority.

patent · May 1, 2026

Paragon 28, Inc. v.TREACE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC.

· IPR2026-00194

Treace Medical announced a confidential settlement with Fusion Orthopedics, ending a lawsuit over its Lapiplasty bunion correction system. The agreement resolves multiple infringement and unfair competition claims.

patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

Verizon Wireless and Fractus settled their IPR dispute before the trial began. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate, dismissing the petition.

patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

A confidential settlement agreement was filed, leading to a joint motion to terminate the IPR.

patent · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

Verizon has filed a petition to invalidate Fractus’s 11,031,677 antenna patent, seeking cancellation of all 20 claims on grounds of obviousness and lack of written description for 4G LTE implementations.

patent · May 1, 2026

Paragon 28, Inc. v.TREACE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC.

· IPR2026-00194

Paragon 28, Inc. has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 30 claims of Treace Medical’s bunion‑correction patent, arguing that the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.

patent · May 1, 2026

Amazon.com Services LLC et al. v.InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc. et al.

· IPR2026-00192

Amazon has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 17 claims of InterDigital’s ’606 video‑encoding patent, asserting obviousness over Sekiguchi, VCEG‑AJ21, Xiong and H.264. The petition details extensive claim‑by‑claim analysis linking each limitation to the prior art.

patent · Apr 15, 2026

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.--

· IPR2026-00337

Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging Whirlpool's 10,512,385 dishwasher patent, asserting that claims 13‑21 are obvious over Bosch, Ochoa, and Schessl references.

1 23•••364