US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 147 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00743
The Board issued an order granting Cala Health and EMKinetics' joint request to keep their Confidential Settlement Agreement private under 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c). The agreement will be treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the patent file.
patent
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00706
Vicor Corporation requests Director Review of PTAB’s denial to institute an IPR against Delta Electronics’ 10,877,534 patent covering stacked power converters. The petition argues the Board improperly relied on expert testimony about heat‑dissipation without objective evidence, contrary to prior art.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco’s IPR against Video Solutions’ video‑encoding patent was instituted, but the patent owner seeks Director Review, alleging the Board ignored evidence, introduced new arguments, and misapplied the Fintiv compelling‑merits standard.
patent denied
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00706
The USPTO denied Vicor Corporation’s request for Director Review of the institution decisions in IPR2024-00706, leaving the denial of institution intact.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00701
The Board granted Samsung Electronics’ motion to join an existing IPR against Intent IQ’s ’878 patent, instituting review of claims 1‑4 and 6‑23. The joinder was found timely and without prejudice, consolidating the proceedings with the Meta Platforms IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo and Ericsson have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,425,817 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo and Ericsson settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 10,425,817, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding. The settlement agreement was ordered to be kept confidential.
patent
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00743
The PTAB issued an order in IPR2024‑00732 and IPR2024‑00743 requiring Cala Health and EMKinetics to file a true copy of their settlement agreement before the proceedings can be terminated.
patent
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00743
Cala Health and EMKinetics jointly moved to dismiss IPR2024‑00743 covering claims 1‑17 of U.S. Patent 11,628,300. The parties cite a confidential settlement and the early, pre‑institution stage of the proceeding as reasons for dismissal.
patent terminated or settled
The Integration Group of Americas, Inc. v.SitePro, Inc.
· IPR2024-00740
The Integration Group and SitePro settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,726,504 B2 before the IPR was instituted, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent denied
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00790
The USPTO denied Micron Technology’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00790, leaving the prior decision on patent 10,868,031 intact.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
Mianyang BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00620
The PTAB held that six of the challenged claims of Samsung Display’s ’593 OLED driver patent are obvious over the Tobita reference, while the remaining claims were upheld.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00691
Amazon and Nokia reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review of Nokia’s U.S. Patent 8,050,321. The Board granted the termination and treated the settlement agreements as confidential business information.
patent
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00686
Dell and AX Wireless have jointly moved to terminate IPR 2024-00686 after reaching a settlement, citing 35 U.S.C. § 317. The Board previously denied a termination request, but the parties submitted a renewed motion.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00691
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 8,050,321 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
patent
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00690
Dyson and Omachron have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,117,550 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites compliance with 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and argues that termination saves resources and promotes settlement policy.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00686
Dell and AX Wireless settled their dispute, leading to the termination of eight inter partes review proceedings covering patents on wireless networking. The Board granted the parties' joint motions to terminate and treated the settlement agreements as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00685
Dell and AX Wireless settled eight inter partes review proceedings before they were instituted. The Board granted the parties' joint motions to terminate and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution, LLC v.Digital Media Technology Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-00736
Disney challenges the Patent Owner’s request for Director Review, asserting that the Board’s claim constructions and prior‑art analysis were correct. The response contends the request adds no new arguments and should be denied.
patent
Godbersen-Smith Construction Company d/b/a GOMACO Corporation v.Guntert & Zimmerman Const. Div., Inc.
· IPR2024-00835
The patent owner has asked the PTAB Director to review the IPR, and the petitioner must respond within five business days with a limited brief. No new evidence is allowed.
patent denied
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.YANGTZE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD.
· IPR2024-00791
The USPTO denied Micron Technology’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00791 (and the related IPR2024-00911). The order contains no substantive patentability findings.
patent
Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution, LLC v.Digital Media Technology Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-00736
Digital Media Technology Holdings seeks a 30‑day extension to file a Director Review request after the PTAB’s final decision on its U.S. Patent 7,574,725, citing good cause due to counsel’s age and heavy workload.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00685
Dell Inc. and Dell Technologies have jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-00685 concerning AX Wireless's patent 10,079,707 after reaching a settlement and filing a joint stipulation for dismissal in federal court.
patent terminated or settled
Zepp Health Corporation v.Slyde Analytics, LLC
· IPR2024-00833
The IPR was terminated after the parties settled following institution.
