US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 149 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-00783
Google and Proxense filed a joint motion to terminate their IPR and to keep the settlement agreement confidential under statutory provisions. The parties seek Board protection of the agreement from public disclosure.
patent denied
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-00720
The PTAB denied MediaTek’s request for rehearing of its earlier decision denying institution of an IPR against MOSAID’s power‑island patent. The Board found the petitioner’s arguments about plural sleep transistors and POSITA knowledge unsubstantiated.
patent terminated or settled
Qorvo, Inc. v.Cornell Research Foundation Inc.
· IPR2024-00758
Qorvo and Cornell Research Foundation settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,250,360, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review by joint motion. The settlement agreement was ordered kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al. v.Foras Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00727
ZF Friedrichshafen, its affiliate, and Nissan have jointly moved to withdraw their IPR against Foras Technologies' vehicle safety patent, citing a settlement and early-stage status of the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
The Integration Group of Americas, Inc. v.SitePro, Inc.
· IPR2024-00739
The Integration Group of Americas and SitePro settled their IPR dispute over patent 9,898,014, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding before trial.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00717
Maxell has filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against Samsung, arguing the Board misapplied the Fintiv factors and relied on rescinded guidance. The petition seeks to deny institution and extend the filing deadline.
patent denied
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-00721
The PTAB denied MediaTek’s request for rehearing of its earlier decision denying institution of an IPR against MOSAID’s 9,350,349 patent covering power islands with plural sleep transistors. The Board found MediaTek’s arguments insufficient and no abuse of discretion.
patent
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00790
Micron has requested a Director Review of the IPR decision against Yangtze Memory Technologies. The Patent Owner has five business days to file a concise response limited to the issues raised, with no new evidence allowed.
patent
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00715
Vicor Corporation has filed a Director Review request challenging the Board’s denial to institute an IPR on Delta Electronics’ 10,877,534 patent covering stacked power converters. The petitioner contends the Board relied on unsupported expert testimony contrary to prior art.
patent
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00715
Vicor Corporation filed a Director Review request after the USPTO denied its institution petition in IPR2024-00715, arguing the Board should have considered the patent owner's expert testimony despite lacking documentary support.
patent
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Eagle View Technologies, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00716
Nearmap requests Director review of the PTAB’s denial to institute its IPR against Eagle View’s geo‑temporal property‑database patent. The petitioner claims the Board misapplied procedural rules, penalized its claim‑chart format and expert declaration length, and ignored substantive prior‑art mappings.
patent
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al. v.InfoExpress Inc.
· IPR2024-00677
Cisco and Fortinet seek a Director Review of a PTAB decision upholding InfoExpress’s network‑authentication patent. They contend the Board improperly allowed incorporation‑by‑reference arguments, violating USPTO rules and prejudicing the challengers. The petition asks the Director to vacate and remand the decision.
patent terminated or settled
Intersect ENT, Inc. et al. v.New Amsterdam, LLC
· IPR2024-00713
Intersect ENT and New Amsterdam settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 6,916,483, filing a joint motion that led the PTAB to terminate the proceeding before trial.
patent
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-00710
WellcomeMat seeks Director Review of a Board decision that declared its video‑editing cue‑point patent invalid. The Owner contends the Board misapplied legal standards on anticipation, obviousness, and claim construction.
patent instituted
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-00710
The PTAB granted institution of an IPR against WellcomeMat’s 8,307,286 patent covering video cue‑point processing for online real‑estate videos. Petitioner Aylo Freesites showed a reasonable likelihood of success on at least one claim, and the Board rejected discretionary denial arguments.
patent terminated or settled
LinkedIn Corporation v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00709
LinkedIn and Intent IQ settled their IPR dispute over patent 10,715,878 B2. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-00710
Aylo Freesites Ltd responded to WellcomeMat’s Director Review request, arguing the Board correctly found claims 13‑15 and 17‑20 of the ’286 patent unpatentable based on proper prior‑art comparison. The Board’s analysis of the video‑editing environment claim term was upheld, and the request for review should be denied.
patent terminated or settled
The Integration Group of Americas, Inc. v.SitePro, Inc.
· IPR2024-00742
The Integration Group of Americas and SitePro entered a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent 11,294,403 and jointly moved to terminate the pending inter partes review. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al. v.InfoExpress Inc.
· IPR2024-00676
Cisco and Fortinet have filed a Request for Director Review seeking to overturn a PTAB decision that allowed InfoExpress’s network‑security patent to survive. They argue the Board improperly accepted arguments incorporated by reference, violating USPTO rules.
patent terminated or settled
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00708
Dell and AX Wireless settled their inter partes review dispute over U.S. Patent 11,212,146. The Board granted the parties' joint motions to terminate the IPRs and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
LinkedIn Corporation v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00709
LinkedIn and patent holder Intent IQ (AlmondNet) reached a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent 10,715,878, prompting a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR.
patent
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00768
The PTAB initiated a sua sponte Director review of several IPRs involving TikTok and Cellspin Soft, staying the cases while it re‑examines institution decisions tied to RPI and sovereign‑entity arguments.
patent
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al. v.InfoExpress Inc.
· IPR2024-00675
InfoExpress defends its NAC patent against Cisco and Fortinet’s Director Review request, asserting the Board already properly evaluated all evidence and that the challengers’ new arguments are untimely. The patent owner seeks denial of the request.
patent terminated or settled
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless LLC
· IPR2024-00707
Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Cisco settled their IPR dispute with Cobblestone Wireless, filing the settlement as confidential and requesting termination of the proceeding.
