US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 136 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
AT&T Services Inc. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-00992
AT&T and other telecom carriers petition the PTAB Director to review a denied institution of an IPR challenging ASUS’s 5G‑related patent. They argue the panel misread prior art, ignored expert testimony, and abused discretion under § 314(a). The petition seeks reversal and institution of the review.
patent terminated or settled
IKEA Supply AG et al. v.Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00987
IKEA Supply and Everlight Electronics settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,905,742, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review after it had been instituted. The settlement agreement is to be kept confidential per regulatory provisions.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00865
The PTAB held that Wiz’s challenge to Orca’s ’685 patent succeeded, finding all 22 claims obvious over multiple cloud‑security references.
patent
IKEA Supply AG et al. v.Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00987
IKEA Supply AG and Everlight Electronics jointly filed a motion to have their settlement agreement treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. §317(b) in IPR2024-00987.
patent
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00986
Ericsson and Nokia, together with patent owner Active Wireless Technologies, filed a joint motion to have their settlement agreements kept confidential under statutory provisions, seeking to separate the materials from the public PTAB file.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
fuboTV Media Inc. et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00918
Petitioners fuboTV and Yanka responded to DISH's Director Review request, arguing the PTAB's decision finding all claims of US 9,407,564 unpatentable was correct and should not be overturned.
patent terminated or settled
TransCore, LP et al. v.Hand Held Products, Inc.
· IPR2024-00982
TransCore and Hand Held Products entered a confidential settlement and jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-00982 before the Board issued an institution decision.
patent terminated or settled
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00985
Ericsson and Nokia settled with Active Wireless Technologies, leading the PTAB to terminate three inter partes review proceedings. The settlement agreements were also deemed business‑confidential.
patent
fuboTV Media Inc. et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00917
Petitioners fuboTV Media and Yanka Industries filed an authorized response opposing DISH’s Director Review request on patent 10,757,156. They argue the Board’s decision was correct, that DISH raised new and irrelevant theories, and that the request should be denied.
patent
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00911
Micron seeks Director Review of a PTAB decision that left its 3D NAND flash patent claims unchallenged. The petition argues the Board misapplied obviousness standards and ignored reply evidence. A reversal could affect the enforceability of claims 8 and 10 of U.S. Patent 10,937,806.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00907
Maxell seeks Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against Samsung’s Bluetooth streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied discretionary denial standards and ignored key Fintiv factors.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01004
Samsung and Staton Techiya jointly moved to end multiple IPRs covering patent 11,710,473. The PTAB granted the termination and partially approved confidentiality of the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled
VusionGroup SA et al. v.Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00963
VusionGroup and Hanshow Technology have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,701,321 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review.
patent instituted
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
The PTAB denied Inari Agriculture's request for Director Review of the institution decision on Corteva's patent 8,901,378, leaving the institution in place.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-00978
Samsung, Google and Cerence reached a settlement that led the PTAB to terminate the IPR on patent 7,395,078. The Board found good cause to end the proceeding and kept the settlement documents confidential.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00906
Maxell has filed a Request for Director Review, arguing the PTAB erred in instituting an IPR against Samsung by ignoring the Fintiv factors and the rescinded 2022 Guidance Memo. The company seeks a denial of institution and an extension of the filing deadline.
patent denied
fuboTV Media Inc. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00904
The PTAB denied fuboTV Media’s request for rehearing of the final written decision in IPR2024-00046, finding no error in the Board’s claim construction or consideration of prior art. The petition’s arguments on claim 7 were deemed untimely and unsupported.
patent denied
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00977
The PTAB denied BOE Technology Group’s request for rehearing of its denied institution of an IPR on claims 7‑13 and 15‑20 of U.S. Patent 9,557,606. The Board held that the petitioner failed to define “wiring line” and did not show a reasonable likelihood of success.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-00978
Samsung Electronics, Google LLC and Cerence Operating Company have reached a settlement over U.S. Patent 7,395,078, a speech‑recognition technology. Consequently, they filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR, citing the settlement and early stage of the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Redstone Logics LLC
· IPR2024-00974
Samsung and Redstone Logics settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,253,925. The parties jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR and requested the settlement be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
IKEA Supply AG et al. v.Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00972
IKEA Supply AG and Everlight Electronics settled their inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,640,733 B2. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
VusionGroup SA et al. v.Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00963
VusionGroup and Hanshow Technology entered a settlement that led to the termination of two inter partes review proceedings (IPR2024-00857 and IPR2024-00963). The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and partially protected the settlement documents as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al. v.Foras Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00969
ZF Friedrichshafen, Nissan, and Foras Technologies have jointly moved to withdraw the IPR petition for U.S. Patent 7,502,958, citing a settlement that resolves all disputes and requesting termination of the proceeding.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
fuboTV Media Inc. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00901
The PTAB denied fuboTV's request for rehearing of its IPR decision on patent 11,677,798. The Board held that the petitioner failed to show any misapprehension of prior‑art mappings or erroneous claim construction, leaving the earlier mixed result unchanged.
