US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 135 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
fuboTV Media Inc. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00905
The PTAB held that many claims of the ’555 adaptive‑rate streaming patent are obvious over prior art (Ogdon, Allen, and SMIL 2.0), rendering them unpatentable, while other claims remain valid.
patent
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01088
Apple Inc. is facing a Director Review request from Smith Interface Technologies in IPR2024-01088. The Board has limited the petitioner’s response to 15 pages and barred new evidence, with a decision pending.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon and Nokia settled their IPR dispute, filing a joint motion to terminate IPR2024-00924, which rendered the Director Review request for IPR2024-00920 moot.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon and Nokia settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,077,991 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential under statutory authority.
patent
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over patent 8,077,991 and have jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and argues that termination serves public policy and resource efficiency.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
fuboTV Media Inc. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00904
The PTAB held that 17 of the 25 challenged claims of DISH’s adaptive‑bitrate streaming patent are obvious over prior art, while 8 claims survive. The decision affirms most of fuboTV’s objections but leaves several claims intact.
patent terminated or settled
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00996
Anker Innovations and Powermat Technologies jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-00996, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
patent
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00996
Powermat Technologies defends its 8,626,461 patent on inductive power efficiency monitoring against Anker Innovations' IPR challenge. The response argues that the cited prior art (Olson, Stevens, Jin) fails to disclose or render obvious the claimed features. The Board is urged to uphold the patentability of claims 13‑18.
patent instituted
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00909
The PTAB has instituted an inter partes review of claim 10 of Micron’s challenged 3D NAND patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability over the Toyama reference.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
fuboTV Media Inc. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00902
The PTAB held 16 of the 25 challenged claims of DISH’s adaptive‑rate streaming patent unpatentable as obvious over Ogdon and Allen, with two additional claims invalidated over Ogdon, Allen, and SMIL 2.0. The remaining nine claims were upheld.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01043
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,918,741 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under the settlement confidentiality provisions.
patent
fuboTV Media Inc. et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00919
Petitioners fuboTV and Yanka have responded to DISH’s Director Review request, arguing the Board’s decision that all challenged claims of patent 8,868,772 are unpatentable should stand. They contend DISH’s arguments are outside the scope of review and that the prior art clearly discloses continuous playback.
patent terminated or settled
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00995
Anker Innovations and Powermat Technologies settled their wireless‑charging patent dispute in IPR2024‑00995. The Board terminated the proceeding and ordered the settlement agreement to be kept confidential.
patent denied
Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v.Sfara, Inc.
· IPR2024-00966
The PTAB denied Cambridge Mobile Telemetics' request for Director Review of the institution decisions in IPR2024-00952 and IPR2024-00966, keeping the institution decisions denied. The petitioner's appeal was rejected without substantive reconsideration.
patent instituted
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00909
Micron’s IPR against Yangtze Memory’s 3D NAND patent was instituted, with the Board finding a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness over the Toyama reference.
patent denied
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P. et al. v.Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00990
The USPTO denied Weatherford's request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00990 concerning Halliburton's oilfield patent 11,333,007 B2.
patent terminated or settled
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00995
Anker Innovations and Powermat Technologies have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,083,204 and filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review.
patent
fuboTV Media Inc. et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00919
DISH Technologies requests a Director Review to overturn a PTAB decision that found its adaptive‑bitrate streaming patent obvious. The petition alleges procedural and substantive errors, including improper theory shifting and misinterpretation of prior art.
patent denied
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-00981
The USPTO denied Kia and Toyota's request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00981 concerning Emerging Automotive's vehicle‑control patent (US 9,365,188).
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01024
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under statutory authority.
patent
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00995
Powermat Technologies filed a preliminary response to Anker Innovations' IPR petition on U.S. Patent 9,083,204, arguing that the petition fails to show a reasonable likelihood of success and that the prior art was already considered, warranting a denial of institution.
patent terminated or settled
IKEA Supply AG et al. v.Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00972
IKEA Supply AG and Everlight Electronics jointly moved to terminate IPR2024‑00972 after settling their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,640,733. The Board was asked to end the proceeding per 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent
Anker Innovations Limited v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00994
Powermat Technologies Ltd. has filed a preliminary response to Anker Innovations’ IPR petition on U.S. Patent 9,048,696, arguing that the petition lacks a reasonable likelihood of success and that the cited prior art was already considered during prosecution. The owner seeks a denial of institution under § 325(d).
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01024
Roku and VideoLabs settled all disputes over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 B2. The PTAB terminated the three related IPRs under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) after the parties filed a joint motion and settlement agreement.
