US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 137 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Iarnach Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00899
Iarnach Technologies seeks denial of an IPR filed by Nokia and AT&T over U.S. Patent 9,806,892 covering direct power‑state transitions in passive optical networks. The owner argues the cited references do not disclose such transitions and invokes Fintiv discretionary denial factors due to parallel district‑court cases.
patent terminated or settled
Recycled Plastics Industries, LLC et al. v.Tangent Technologies LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00898
Recycled Plastics Industries and Tangent Technologies settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,981,350 B1, prompting the PTAB to terminate the IPR before it was instituted.
patent
Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Iarnach Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00900
Iarnach argues Nokia’s IPR petition fails to map the patent’s “parameter set” claim language to any prior art and should be denied under Fintiv discretionary standards due to filing delay and overlapping district‑court cases.
patent terminated or settled
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00951
Ericsson and Nokia settled with Active Wireless Technologies, leading the PTAB to terminate three inter partes review proceedings. The settlement agreements were also designated as business‑confidential information.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00950
Dyson and Omachron have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,080,472 and jointly filed a motion to have the settlement agreement treated as confidential and to terminate the IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Recycled Plastics Industries, LLC et al. v.Tangent Technologies LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00898
Recycled Plastics Industries and Tangent Technologies filed a joint motion to terminate IPR No. 2024‑00898, seeking confidential treatment of their settlement agreement under 35 U.S.C. §317. The parties argue the settlement resolves all issues concerning patent 10,981,350.
patent terminated or settled
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00951
Ericsson, Nokia and Active Wireless Technologies have settled their 5G NR patent dispute and jointly moved to terminate the IPR. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and public policy supports termination.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00940
The PTAB held that 17 of the 25 challenged claims of DISH’s ’680 adaptive‑bitrate streaming patent were obvious over Ogdon and Allen, while 8 claims remained patentable.
patent denied
Duration Media v.Rich Media Club LLC
· IPR2024-00937
The PTAB denied Duration Media's request for Director Review of the decision that had denied institution of IPR2024‑00937 concerning patent 11,741,482. The denial leaves the institution decision unchanged.
patent terminated or settled
T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
· IPR2024-00946
T‑Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Nokia and Ericsson settled the IPR against Cobblestone Wireless’s 7,924,802 patent and asked the PTAB to keep the settlement confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
patent
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
Siemens Mobility and co‑petitioners seek Director review of a PTAB decision denying institution of an IPR on their UWB train‑control patent. They argue the Board wrongly treated a cited patent number as previously presented art and erred in finding the prior art was substantially the same as that considered during prosecution.
patent terminated or settled
FormFactor, Inc. v.Technoprobe S.p.A.
· IPR2024-00933
The IPR concerning patent 11,035,885 was terminated after the parties settled following institution.
patent all challenged claims upheld
Duration Media v.Rich Media Club LLC
· IPR2024-00937
The PTAB affirmed all ten claims of the ’329 ad‑viewability patent, finding Duration Media failed to prove obviousness over Krassner, Badros, and Harkins. Claim constructions on “render,” “replacement advertisement,” and the “in‑response‑to” step were adopted.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01018
Google and Kove IO settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,103,640, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPRs before any trial was instituted.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Empire Technology Development LLC
· IPR2024-00896
Empire Technology Development LLC seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s decision that claims 25‑28 of its 8,798,120 patent are unpatentable. The owner argues the Board misapplied the district court’s claim construction and relied on unsupported prior art. Samsung Electronics is the challenger.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00863
Wiz successfully challenged Orca Security’s 11,663,031 patent covering virtual‑machine snapshot security. The PTAB found all 16 claims obvious over a combination of prior art references and declared them unpatentable.
patent terminated or settled
FormFactor, Inc. v.Technoprobe S.p.A.
· IPR2024-00933
FormFactor and Technoprobe have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,035,885 and jointly moved to terminate the IPR. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent
Godbersen-Smith Construction Company d/b/a GOMACO Corporation v.Guntert & Zimmerman Const. Div., Inc.
· IPR2024-00835
The PTAB held that all 15 claims of the ’571 slipform paving machine patent are unpatentable, finding the claims obvious over the CIII operator manual combined with Rio’s rotary actuator and other prior art.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Empire Technology Development LLC
· IPR2024-00896
Samsung files a reply supporting its IPR petition against Empire Technology’s 8,798,120 patent, arguing that the claim term “idle power consumption of the mobile station” is correctly construed and that claims 25‑29 are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references covering power‑control techniques.
patent terminated or settled
ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al. v.Foras Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00969
ZF Friedrichshafen, ZF Active Safety, and Nissan settled with Foras Technologies over U.S. Patent 7,502,958, filing a joint motion to withdraw the IPR. The Board terminated the proceeding and sealed the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00924
Sony and Optimum Imaging Technologies have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,612,805 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00875
SMAXTEC and its affiliate contest ST Reproductive Technologies' Director Review request, defending the Board’s obviousness findings for several claims of a livestock health monitoring patent and offering limited remand only to clarify claim 18 and reconcile claims 6, 19, and 20.
patent terminated or settled
Capital One, National Association v.--
· IPR2024-00878
Capital One and Implicit, LLC settled their IPR dispute over a payment‑card fraud patent, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding before a trial was instituted.
patent terminated or settled
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00924
Sony and Optimum Imaging Technologies settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,612,805, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings. The settlement agreement is treated as confidential business information.
