US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 132 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01042
Verizon, T‑Mobile, and AT&T have settled with Headwater Research and filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR covering patent 8,924,543, ending the proceeding before any merits decision.
patent terminated or settled
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00986
Ericsson, Nokia and Active Wireless have settled their dispute over a multicast patent, filing a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and the parties cite public policy and statutory authority to end the review.
patent terminated or settled
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00985
Ericsson and Nokia jointly moved to terminate an IPR over Active Wireless's 5G PUCCH patent after reaching settlement agreements with the patent owner. The Board was asked to end the proceeding because the merits had not yet been decided and public policy favors settlement.
patent terminated or settled
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01041
Verizon Wireless and other carriers settled with Headwater Research, leading to the termination of an IPR over patent 8,924,543 B2. The Board granted the joint motion to end the proceeding and kept the settlement documents confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-01036
Samsung and ASUS settled four inter partes review proceedings before any trial began. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and ordered the settlement agreements to be kept confidential.
patent denied
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
The PTAB denied Optronic Sciences’ request to revisit the institution of six inter partes reviews, finding no extraordinary circumstances and that the deadline for further briefing had passed.
patent
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-00981
Kia and Toyota challenge a patent owner's request to overturn a PTAB decision on a vehicle e‑key system, arguing the Board correctly applied the Kleve prior art. They seek denial of the Director Review.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01032
Samsung, Harman and Staton Techiya have settled their IPR over U.S. Patent 11,683,643 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
patent
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00985
Ericsson, Nokia and Active Wireless have filed a joint motion to keep their 5G patent settlement materials confidential under applicable statutes. The request cites 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and argues it is timely.
patent
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01093
Pictiva Displays has filed a Director Review request to overturn the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against Samsung Display’s ‘164 patent, arguing the Board ignored a full Fintiv analysis after a guidance memo was rescinded.
patent terminated or settled
TransCore, LP et al. v.Hand Held Products, Inc.
· IPR2024-00982
TransCore and Hand Held Products settled their IPR dispute over a handheld scanner patent. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceedings before trial, treating the settlement as confidential.
patent
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-00981
Emerging Automotive LLC has filed a Director Review request challenging the Board’s decision that its e‑key patent claims are anticipated by the Kleve reference. The patent owner argues the Board relied on undisclosed "rental start period" functionality, constituting an abuse of discretion and erroneous factual findings.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01031
Samsung, its U.S. affiliate and Harman have reached a settlement with Staton Techiya over U.S. Patent 11,659,315 covering smart‑headphone technology. They jointly filed a motion to terminate the inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent terminated or settled
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting and Wangs Alliance settled their IPR dispute over a lighting patent before the trial was instituted. The Board dismissed the petition and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-00979
Samsung, Google and Cerence entered a joint settlement that led to the termination of two inter partes review proceedings covering Cerence's automotive voice‑assistant patents. The Board granted the motion to terminate and ordered the settlement agreements to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01043
Amazon and Nokia reached a settlement, leading to a joint motion that terminated the IPRs covering Nokia’s patent 8,918,741. The Board granted the motion and treated the settlement documents as confidential.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01132
BOE Technology and Optronic Sciences filed a joint notice confirming that the IPR oral hearing transcript and final written decision will be made fully public, and that specific exhibits will not remain sealed.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-00979
Samsung, Google and Cerence have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,081,993, filing a joint motion to terminate the IPR. The Board has been asked to dismiss the proceeding based on the settlement.
patent
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01025
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 and jointly request that the settlement be kept confidential. The motion asks the PTAB to treat the agreement as business‑confidential information under statutory provisions.
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01025
Roku and VideoLabs settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236, leading the PTAB to terminate three inter partes review proceedings. The Board cited public‑policy reasons favoring settlement and treated the agreement as confidential business information.
patent terminated or settled
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01046
Sony and Optimum Imaging Technologies have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,877,266. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review, citing 35 U.S.C. § 317. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-01036
Samsung and Asus have jointly filed a motion to keep their settlement materials confidential under statutory provisions, requesting the Board to separate the documents from the public file.
patent terminated or settled
Hartmann US Inc. et al. v.Tabone, Maurice
· IPR2024-01037
Hartmann US Inc. and The Happy Group settled their IPR dispute with inventor Maurice Tabone over Patent 10,287,070. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding before institution and ordered the settlement agreement kept confidential.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00976
BOE Technology Group seeks Director Review of a PTAB institution decision, arguing the Board misapplied obviousness law on two grounds involving Kurashina/Sato and Murade‑109/Murade‑125 references. The petitioner contends that universal motivations and known techniques provide sufficient motivation to combine the references.
