US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 133 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al. v.Foras Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00969
ZF Friedrichshafen, Nissan and Foras Technologies filed a joint motion to keep their settlement agreement confidential and to withdraw the IPR, effectively ending the dispute.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
BOE Technology and Optronic Sciences settled three USPTO IPRs (01130, 01132, 01133) and withdrew their pending Director Review requests, ending further proceedings.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Portsmouth Network Corporation
· IPR2024-00954
Cisco seeks Director Review of a PTAB denial that found its VPLS failover claims un‑obvious over the Mitchell reference. The petition alleges the Board improperly added claim limitations, applied the wrong obviousness standard, and ignored the modified prior‑art embodiment.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01033
Samsung and Staton Techiya settled their IPR over patent 11,750,965 and jointly moved to have the settlement kept confidential and the proceeding terminated.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01022
Google and Kove IO have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,233,978 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet issued an institution decision.
patent
IKEA Supply AG et al. v.Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00972
IKEA Supply AG and Everlight Electronics jointly filed a motion to have their settlement agreement treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The request cites statutory and regulatory authority and argues the agreement contains confidential dispute‑resolution terms.
patent terminated or settled
Solventum Corporation v.M.E.A.C. Engineering Ltd.
· IPR2024-01001
Solventum Corporation and M.E.A.C. Engineering reached a settlement that led to the termination of IPR2024-01001 before any trial was instituted. The Board granted the motion to terminate and ordered the settlement agreement to remain confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01021
Google and Kove IO have settled their dispute over Patent 7,233,978 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet issued an institution decision.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01020
Google and data‑storage startup Kove IO have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,814,170 and jointly filed a motion to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet issued an institution decision.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01017
Google and Kove IO settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,103,640 before the Board instituted a trial. The joint termination motion was granted, dismissing the petitions and keeping the settlement agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
VusionGroup SA et al. v.Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00963
VusionGroup and Hanshow Technology jointly moved to end IPR 2024‑00963 and asked the PTAB to keep their final settlement agreement confidential under statutory authority.
patent terminated or settled
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v.MHL Custom, Inc.
· IPR2024-01108
Bombardier Recreational Products and MHL Custom settled their inter partes review, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding. The Board granted the joint motion and kept the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01017
Google and Kove IO have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,103,640 and filed a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00957
Google’s IPR against a 7,454,056 LCD patent was terminated after the Patent Owner disclaimed all remaining claims, prompting the Board to enter an adverse judgment against the owner.
patent terminated or settled
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.Bell Semiconductor, LLC
· IPR2024-01010
NXP USA and Bell Semiconductor jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-00168 after reaching a settlement, and the Board granted the termination while keeping the settlement documents confidential.
patent all challenged claims upheld
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01013
The PTAB affirmed all claims of LG Energy Solution’s lithium‑ion battery patent after finding the challenger’s obviousness arguments unsupported. The Board emphasized that Ohata’s masterbatch embeds carbon nanotubes, preventing the required ionic attachment, and rejected the petitioner’s speculation about resin removal.
patent
Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v.Sfara, Inc.
· IPR2024-00966
Cambridge Mobile Telematics filed a Request for Director Review challenging a PTAB denial of institution for its IPR against Sfara’s vehicle‑identification patent. The petitioner argues the Board misapplied 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3) by demanding a means‑plus‑function construction that the claims lack. The request seeks clarification of the rule and reversal of the denial.
patent
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
Corteva Agriscience seeks Director review of a PTAB decision that instituted inter‑partes review of its transgenic corn patent, arguing the Board misapplied enablement law and misread factual evidence of germplasm availability.
patent all challenged claims upheld
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01011
LG Energy Solution’s challenge to the ’924 lithium‑ion battery patent was rejected. The Board found no sufficient evidence of obviousness over the cited prior art, leaving all five claims intact.
patent
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01009
Intel has filed a petition for Director Review challenging the PTAB's denial to institute an IPR against Ericsson's 10,142,659 patent covering a deblocking filter in video codecs. Intel argues the Board misapplied obviousness standards regarding result‑effective variables. The petition seeks reversal of the denial and institution of the trial.
patent
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00951
Ericsson, Nokia and Active Wireless jointly request that their 5G NR settlement be kept confidential, invoking statutory confidentiality provisions.
patent terminated or settled
PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v.National Nail, Corp.
· IPR2024-01100
PrimeSource Building Products and National Nail settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 10,378,218 before the Board instituted a trial. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent
Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v.Sfara, Inc.
· IPR2024-00952
Cambridge Mobile Telematics filed a Request for Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR on the 8,989,952 vehicle‑crash detection patent. The petitioner argues that the Board’s reading of 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3) unfairly forces disclosure of means‑plus‑function constructions that are not at issue. The request seeks clarification of the rule and reversal of the denial.
patent terminated or settled
T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
· IPR2024-00946
The IPR over Cobblestone Wireless's patent 7,924,802 was terminated after the parties reached a settlement. A joint motion to dismiss was filed and granted, ending the proceeding before institution.
