US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 131 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent instituted · Oct 18, 2024
Tesla Inc. v.Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-00032
Tesla Inc. successfully secured institution in this IPR against Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC for battery charging system claims. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on combinations of prior art references.
patent instituted · Oct 18, 2024
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2025-00030
MediaTek Inc. successfully petitioned to challenge ParkerVision, Inc.'s '593 patent in an IPR proceeding before the PTAB. The Board instituted the trial on all 20 challenged claims based on obviousness (103), despite arguments regarding constitutional due process and duplication of district court litigation.
patent instituted · Oct 18, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01503
Amazon successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against Nokia regarding video compression methods. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (103) and anticipation (102).
patent Final Written Decision · Oct 18, 2024
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2025-00030
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all 20 challenged claims of the '593 patent unpatentable. The Board adopted Petitioner's view on claim construction for "power efficiency," allowing indirect measurements (voltage/current) rather than strictly a ratio, which was key to establishing obviousness.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
An exhibit email shows that Google, the petitioner, does not oppose Multifold International’s request to replace a previously filed Request for Director Review of the PTAB’s institution decision, asking the Board to accept a corrected filing without additional fees.
patent terminated or settled · Oct 17, 2024
Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Woodbury Wireless, LLC
· IPR2025-00048
Nokia, AT&T and T‑Mobile jointly settled with Woodbury Wireless and moved to terminate the IPR over patent 9,496,930. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under statutory termination provisions.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
Google filed an authorized response defending the Board’s decision to institute an IPR against Multifold’s patent, arguing the patent owner’s antedating evidence is insufficient and its declarants lack credibility.
patent terminated or settled · Oct 17, 2024
Motorola Mobility LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00039
Motorola Mobility and Google settled with Multifold International over U.S. Patent 9,146,589, leading to a joint motion to terminate the IPR. The Board granted the termination and kept the settlement confidential.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
Multifold International seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against its dual‑screen smartphone patent, arguing the Board relied on a single dependent claim and ignored substantial antedating evidence. The petition contends the institution is inefficient and better suited for district‑court resolution.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
Google and Motorola challenged Multifold’s dual‑screen smartphone patent. The PTAB instituted the IPR on a single dependent claim, prompting Multifold to seek Director Review, arguing the Board ignored extensive antedating evidence and violated efficiency guidelines.
patent terminated or settled · Oct 17, 2024
Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Woodbury Wireless, LLC
· IPR2025-00048
Nokia, AT&T and T‑Mobile have settled their IPR dispute with Woodbury Wireless over U.S. Patent 9,496,930. The parties filed a joint motion to keep the settlement confidential and to terminate the proceeding.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00061
Google and Motorola jointly filed a request to keep their settlement agreements with Multifold International confidential under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The parties seek to have the covenants not to sue treated as business confidential information and excluded from the public patent file.
patent terminated or settled · Oct 17, 2024
Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Woodbury Wireless, LLC
· IPR2025-00048
Nokia, AT&T, and T‑Mobile jointly settled with Woodbury Wireless over U.S. Patent 9,496,930, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPR before institution. Settlement agreements were kept confidential per Board order.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-01465
Google filed Director Review requests for two IPRs challenging Cerence’s in‑car voice‑assistant patent. The Board limited the patent owner’s reply to five pages and barred new evidence, with a decision pending.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-01465
Google and Samsung have filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution for an IPR against Cerence’s ‘750 patent. The petition argues the Board acted ultra vires by retroactively applying new guidance and mis‑weighing the Fintiv factors, especially the Sotera stipulation. The request seeks reversal and institution of the review.
patent terminated or settled · Oct 17, 2024
Motorola Mobility LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00039
Motorola Mobility, Google and Multifold International have jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00039 after reaching a settlement and filing covenants not to sue. The Board noted good cause for termination given the early stage of the proceeding.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Motorola Mobility LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00039
Motorola Mobility, Google, and Multifold International have jointly filed a request to keep their settlement covenants confidential, invoking 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The request seeks to separate the agreements from the public patent file and limit disclosure to government agencies or parties with good cause.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
Multifold International has submitted a Director Review request in IPR2025-00058 against Google. The petitioner may file a concise, five‑page response within five business days, with no new evidence allowed.
patent denied · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-01465
The PTAB denied Google’s request for Director Review of the institution decisions in two IPRs challenging Cerence’s voice‑assistant patent, leaving the institution denials in place.
patent denied · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-01465
Cerence Operating Company opposes Google’s request for Director Review, asserting the Board properly denied institution under 35 U.S.C. §314(a). The patent owner emphasizes due‑process compliance and the correct application of Fintiv factors.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00061
Google and Motorola have filed an IPR petition to invalidate ten claims of Multifold's UI patent, arguing obviousness over Purcell/Nicholas and Gillespie/Yook prior art. The petition also challenges discretionary denial and seeks institution.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00058
Google and Motorola petition IPR to invalidate Multifold’s 9,158,494 patent covering dual‑screen UI methods, asserting that earlier Seo, Yook and Choi disclosures anticipate or make the claims obvious.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00060
Google and Motorola have filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Multifold’s 8,842,080 patent covering multi‑display icon handling on handheld devices. The petition alleges anticipation and obviousness over Japanese patents Ogawa, Yook, and Choi and argues against discretionary denial.
patent · Oct 17, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00059
Google and Motorola have filed an IPR petition against Multifold's dual‑screen patent, seeking to invalidate twelve claims as obvious over Yook, Bauer and Lee references. The petition argues that discretionary denial is inappropriate and requests institution.
