US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 130 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v.MHL Custom, Inc.
· IPR2024-01107
Bombardier Recreational Products and MHL Custom settled their IPR dispute, leading the PTAB to terminate the review of patent 9,586,659. The settlement agreement was kept confidential under statutory provisions.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.NL GIKEN INCORPORATED
· IPR2024-01161
Amazon, its affiliates and Twitch filed a joint motion to terminate IPR2024-01161 after reaching a confidential settlement with NL Giken, ending the dispute over U.S. Patent 9,319,615.
patent terminated or settled
Hoymiles USA, Inc. et al. v.CyboEnergy, Inc.
· IPR2024-01106
Hoymiles USA and CyboEnergy have settled their PTAB IPR dispute over a photovoltaic inverter patent and jointly moved to have the settlement agreement treated as confidential, requesting termination of the proceeding.
patent
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00995
Powermat Technologies Ltd. rebuts Anker Innovations’ IPR petition, arguing that none of the cited references anticipate or render obvious the claims of its 9,083,204 inductive power transfer patent. The Patent Owner seeks confirmation of patentability.
patent
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01104
Dr. Squatch, LLC argues that the PTAB correctly found the challenged deodorant stick claims obvious and that the patent owner’s request for Director Review should be denied. The response emphasizes proper claim construction, prior‑art teachings, and complete RPI disclosure.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01021
Google and Kove IO settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,233,978 before trial. The Board granted a Joint Termination Motion and dismissed the petitions.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01176
Amazon and Nokia settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,175,148. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding and treated the settlement documents as confidential, without deciding the merits.
patent
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01104
Procter & Gamble requests PTAB Director Review to overturn a decision that found its natural deodorant patent obvious. The company alleges the Board misapplied an extrinsic hardness test, ignored motivation to combine prior art, and the petitioner failed to disclose all real parties in interest.
patent terminated or settled
Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01181
Lenovo and Motorola jointly moved with Headwater Research to terminate IPR 2024‑01181 after settling the dispute over Patent 10,749,700, including related district‑court litigation.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01020
Google and Kove IO settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,814,170 before the Board could institute a trial. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate, which the PTAB granted, dismissing the petitions.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01019
Google and Kove IO have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,814,170 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet instituted the case, and the parties cite judicial economy for the termination.
patent
Anker Innovations Limited v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00994
Powermat Technologies defends its 9,048,696 inductive‑charging patent against Anker’s IPR petition, arguing that the cited references do not render any of the challenged claims obvious and that there is no motivation to combine them.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01018
Google and Kove IO settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,103,640, filing a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR before institution.
patent
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01095
Samsung Display requests Director Review to overturn a PTAB decision that found Pictiva’s OLED claim unpatentable, arguing the Board ignored a jury verdict that upheld the claim and presented inconsistent claim‑construction arguments.
patent
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01083
An email notifies that the PTAB has received a Director Review request in IPR2024-01083 and outlines strict response limits for Apple.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01019
Google and Kove IO settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,814,170. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding before institution, keeping the settlement confidential.
patent
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01095
Samsung Display argues that the Board’s obviousness findings for Pictiva’s OLED patent are sound and that no claim‑construction inconsistency exists, seeking denial of Pictiva’s Director review request.
patent terminated or settled
Hoymiles USA, Inc. et al. v.CyboEnergy, Inc.
· IPR2024-01106
Hoymiles USA and CyboEnergy settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,786,133 B2. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent denied
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01009
The PTAB denied Intel’s request for Director Review of the decision that refused to institute the IPR against Ericsson’s U.S. Patent 10,142,659.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P. et al. v.Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00990
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision in IPR2024‑00990, finding Halliburton’s claims 11,12 and 14‑20 unpatentable and also striking substitute claims 29‑37, while upholding claims 1‑10 and 21‑23. Halliburton has appealed the decision to the Federal Circuit.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01004
Samsung and Staton Techiya have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,710,473 and jointly request the Board keep the settlement confidential and terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01004
Samsung and Staton Techiya have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,710,473 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
patent
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01094
Samsung Display contests Pictiva’s request for Director Review, asserting the PTAB correctly found the ’223 patent claims obvious over the Ma reference. The petitioner maintains no inconsistency with district‑court findings and seeks denial of the review.
patent
Solventum Corporation v.M.E.A.C. Engineering Ltd.
· IPR2024-01002
Solventum Corp. filed an unopposed motion to keep its settlement with M.E.A.C. Engineering confidential and to terminate the IPR on patent 8,858,534.
