US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 129 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01031
Samsung, its U.S. affiliate, and Harman jointly moved to terminate their IPRs against Staton Techiya’s patents. The PTAB granted the termination and treated the settlement agreement as confidential business information.
patent terminated or settled
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01128
Nike and SherryWear have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,244,800 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01012
LG Energy Solution successfully challenged the ’282 battery‑binder patent, with the PTAB finding all 16 claims unpatentable based on obviousness over multiple carbon‑nanotube references.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01031
Samsung Electronics, Harman International and Staton Techiya have settled their IPR over patent 11,659,315 and filed a joint motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential and terminate the proceeding.
patent
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting and Wangs Alliance have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate IPR2024-01027 concerning patent 11028854.
patent denied
Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v.GoPro, Inc.
· IPR2024-01052
The USPTO denied Insta360’s request for Director Review of the PTAB’s Final Written Decision on GoPro’s camera patent (US 11,336,832). The denial leaves the original PTAB ruling in place.
patent
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting, LLC and Wangs Alliance Corporation have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate IPR2024-01027 concerning patent 11028854. The motion seeks to end the inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01126
Nike and SherryWear reached a confidential settlement, prompting the PTAB to terminate the IPRs covering SherryWear’s footwear patent (U.S. 10,219,550). The Board cited statutory authority to end the review before any merits were decided.
patent denied
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01205
The PTAB denied Motorola Solutions' request for rehearing of the Director Review Decision that vacated the institution of IPR2024‑01205. The Board held that the rescission of the 2022 Interim Procedure Memo was correctly applied and that Motorola failed to show specific errors. The denial leaves the Director Review decision standing.
patent terminated or settled
Wiz, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-01191
Wiz, Inc. and Orca Security reached a confidential settlement that led the PTAB to terminate the IPR on patent 11,775,326. All pending motions were dismissed as moot and the settlement documents were sealed.
patent
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01026
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,667,304 and jointly filed a motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential under statutory provisions.
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01025
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, citing 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01026
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,667,304 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion relies on statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and cites the lack of a final written decision.
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 and jointly request the Board keep the settlement confidential and terminate the proceeding.
patent
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01024
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236 and filed a joint motion to keep the settlement confidential and terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku and VideoLabs settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,291,236, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01124
Nike and SherryWear have settled all disputes over patent 9,723,878 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board is asked to end the review under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and keep the settlement confidential.
patent
Curtis Industries, LLC et al. v.B & D TECHNOLOGIES LLC
· IPR2024-01150
Curtis Industries and B&D Technologies jointly filed a request to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and related regulations during an IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01123
Nike and SherryWear settled their inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,295,288. The Board terminated the IPR by joint motion, treating the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01122
Nike and SherryWear have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,289,016 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion relies on 35 U.S.C. § 317 to end the proceeding before a final decision is issued.
patent terminated or settled
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku and VideoLabs have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,291,236, jointly moving to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01105
Dr. Squatch challenges P&G's deodorant stick patent, arguing the claims are obvious over known formulations and that P&G's RPI arguments fail. The Board’s prior findings support the petitioner's position, and the request for director review should be denied.
patent terminated or settled
Google LLC v.Kove IO, Inc.
· IPR2024-01022
Google and Kove IO settled their IPR dispute over patent 7,233,978, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings before trial.
patent
Anker Innovations Ltd. v.Powermat Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00996
Powermat’s preliminary response argues that Anker’s IPR petition should be denied because the cited prior art was already considered by the USPTO and does not disclose the full claim scope.
