US PTAB IP Litigation

The USPTO Director denied OneSource Solutions' request for Director Review of the denial to institute a PGR against Hippocratic AI's patent 12,142,371. The original institution denial therefore remains in effect.

OneSource Solutions International, Inc. et al. v.Hippocratic AI, Inc.

patent denied · Dec 8, 2025

OneSource Solutions requests Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its challenge to Hippocratic AI’s AI‑LLM patent. The petition focuses on structural and indefiniteness deficiencies in Claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 112(a) and 112(b).

OneSource Solutions International, Inc. et al. v.Hippocratic AI, Inc.

The PTAB denied OneSource Solutions’ request for director review of its denied PGR petition against Hippocratic AI’s U.S. Patent 12,142,371. The Board found the request failed to meet the statutory standards for reversal.

Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. v.Enveric Biosciences Canada, Inc.

· PGR2025-00076

Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate Enveric Biosciences' 2024 patent covering halogenated psilocybin derivatives, asserting anticipation, obviousness, and lack of enablement for all 26 claims.

OneSource Solutions International, Inc. et al. v.Hippocratic AI, Inc.

OSSI has filed a PGR petition seeking cancellation of all 20 claims of Hippocratic AI’s 12,142,371 patent, alleging obviousness, lack of enablement, indefiniteness, and abstract‑idea ineligibility.

OneSource Solutions International, Inc. et al. v.Hippocratic AI, Inc.

OSSI Corporation filed a motion to correct procedural defects in its petition against Hippocratic AI's patent, seeking Board approval to submit a compliant filing.

Google LLC et al. v.ART RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC

· IPR2025-01405

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 24 claims of a video‑playlist patent, arguing they are obvious over earlier patents and a programming textbook. The petition cites Hedinsson, Ford, and Kostello as the prior art basis.

Google LLC et al. v.ART RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC

· IPR2025-01403

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 33 claims of ART Research’s ’840 patent, which covers video annotation and indexing. The challenger alleges obviousness over multiple prior‑art references, including Datar, Zhou, Gupta, Smith, Friedlander, and Mouilleseaux.

Google LLC et al. v.ART RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC

· IPR2025-01404

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 21 claims of ART Research’s ’001 patent, which covers video‑annotation features used in social‑network contexts. The petition argues the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.

patent denied · Dec 8, 2025

Google LLC v.Telcom Ventures LLC

· IPR2025-01409

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 18 claims of Telcom Ventures' NFC‑based mobile payment patent, arguing obviousness over four prior‑art references. The petition also challenges any discretionary denial and requests institution of the review.

OneSource Solutions International, Inc. et al. v.Hippocratic AI, Inc.

patent terminated or settled · Dec 6, 2025

The PTAB denied institution of the Post-Grant Review (PGR) in a dispute involving Hippocratic AI's patent 12142371, finding that the petitioner failed to meet the necessary likelihood of prevailing standard.

Google LLC v.SoundClear Technologies LLC et al.

· IPR2025-01123

Google withdrew its IPR petition against SoundClear's patent, and the Board terminated the proceeding. No claims were instituted or decided.

patent · Dec 6, 2025

Google LLC v.SoundClear Technologies LLC et al.

· IPR2025-01123

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑5 of SoundClear’s voice‑content control patent, arguing that the claims are obvious over the Ocampo and Yi references. The petition requests the Board to institute the review and cancel the challenged claims.

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-01000

Google’s request for Director Review of the denial to institute an IPR on a video‑compression patent was opposed by the patent owner, who argued the Director’s discretion was proper and that statutory and procedural challenges were untenable.

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-01000

Google seeks Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s denial of institution for its IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies’ decoding patent. The petition alleges procedural violations, APA breaches, and improper reliance on rescinded guidance.

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-00998

Google’s request for Director Review of the PTAB’s decision not to institute an IPR on a video‑coding patent was opposed by the patent owner, who argued the denial was proper and requested the review be denied.

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-00999

Google LLC filed a Request for Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies’ ’303 patent. The petitioner alleges procedural errors, APA violations, and improper reliance on discretionary factors. Google seeks reversal of the denial and institution of the trial.

patent terminated or settled · Dec 5, 2025

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-00998

Google has filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution for its IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies’ patent 8,090,025, arguing procedural errors and improper discretionary denial.

Mercedes-Benz Group AG et al. v.Phelan Group, LLC

· IPR2025-00992

Mercedes-Benz and Phelan Group have jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00992 after reaching a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent No. 11,352,020.

Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC

· IPR2025-00999

Google’s petition for Director Review of the PTAB’s decision to deny institution of an IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies’ video‑coding patent was met with a detailed response from the patent owner asserting the denial was proper and that the APA challenges lack merit.