US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 11 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Amazon.com Services LLC v.Smart Speaker LLC
· IPR2026-00145
A notice of decisions on institution was issued, denying several IPRs and granting others, while the status of Amazon's IPR against Smart Speaker remains pending.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Amazon.com Services LLC v.Smart Speaker LLC
· IPR2026-00147
A USPTO notice details institution decisions for several IPRs, leaving the status of Amazon’s challenge to Smart Speaker’s patent unresolved.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Amazon.com Services LLC v.Smart Speaker LLC
· IPR2026-00146
The document lists PTAB institution decisions for multiple IPRs, but does not provide a decision for IPR2026-00146.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Amazon.com Services LLC v.Smart Speaker LLC
· IPR2026-00147
Amazon has filed an IPR petition challenging all 29 claims of Smart Speaker's ’174 smart‑home patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition argues the examiner failed to consider key prior art and that the claims recite routine home‑automation functions.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. et al. v.MYW Semitech, LLC
· IPR2026-00066
TSMC and Apple have filed an IPR petition challenging MYW Semitech’s 11,538,763 chip‑package patent, asserting that all 23 claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition seeks to invalidate the patent before the PTAB.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. et al. v.MYW Semitech, LLC
· IPR2026-00067
TSMC and Apple have filed an IPR petition challenging 27 claims of MYW Semitech’s chip‑package patent. The petition alleges obviousness over several prior‑art references covering interposer and bump technologies.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. et al. v.MYW Semitech, LLC
· IPR2026-00065
TSMC and Apple have filed an IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent 11,107,768, asserting that all 28 claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references covering chip‑package technology.
patent · Nov 21, 2025
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc. d/b/a MeshDynamics
· IPR2026-00127
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 20 claims of MeshDynamics' ’762 VoIP mesh‑network patent, alleging obviousness over four prior‑art references. The petition includes claim constructions and requests the Board to institute review.
patent · Nov 20, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00117
Network‑1’s eUICC security patent (U.S. 12,166,869) faces a petition from Samsung. The patent owner argues the references either teach away or lack the required cryptographic linkage, urging the PTAB to deny institution.
patent · Nov 20, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00117
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 20 claims of Network‑1’s eUICC security patent, alleging obviousness over a combination of prior‑art references covering secure profile provisioning and IMSI encryption.
patent · Nov 19, 2025
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation et al. v.Railware, Inc. et al.
· IPR2026-00135
Wabtec has filed an IPR petition challenging Railware’s RE 49,115 patent. The petition asserts that claims 20‑36 are obvious over the FRA‑Report combined with secret‑code references. No discretionary denial is alleged.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld · Nov 18, 2025
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2026-00129
In IPR2024‑01094, the PTAB held claims 1,2,6,8‑14 of Pictiva’s OLED patent unpatentable over the Ma reference, while claims 3‑4 were upheld. The decision hinged on obviousness of joint vaporization and metal‑complex coordination.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Nov 18, 2025
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2026-00129
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all of Samsung's challenged OLED claims unpatentable. The Board held that the claims were obvious over multiple prior‑art OLED references. The decision affirms the institution of the IPR.
patent · Nov 18, 2025
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2026-00129
Samsung Display has filed an IPR petition to invalidate all 16 claims of Pictiva's OLED patent, arguing that each claim is anticipated or obvious over prior art such as Suzuki, Diekmann, Ma, and Lee.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 14, 2025
NRG Energy, Inc. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00120
Vivint Smart Home and NRG Energy, together with Malikie Innovations, filed a joint motion to terminate an IPR after reaching a settlement that resolves their dispute over a smart‑home energy patent.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 14, 2025
NRG Energy, Inc. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00120
The IPR concerning Patent 11,119,756 was terminated after Vivint Smart Home, NRG Energy and Malikie Innovations reached a confidential settlement before the trial was instituted.
patent · Nov 14, 2025
Samsara Inc. v.Motive Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00108
Samsara has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of Motive’s driver‑monitoring patent (US 12,062,243), asserting that the claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art CNN references.
patent · Nov 14, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited v.Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. et al.
· IPR2026-00130
TSMC has filed a petition to invalidate Marlin Semiconductor’s 9,318,609 FinFET patent, asserting that all ten claims are anticipated or obvious over earlier TSMC patents and related publications. The petition lists multiple grounds under §§102 and 103, relying on Xu, Ching, and Huang references.
patent · Nov 14, 2025
NRG Energy, Inc. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00120
Vivint Smart Home and NRG Energy have filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all twenty claims of Malikie Innovations’ ’756 patent covering IoT software‑update control, citing obviousness over the Storto and Won publications.
patent instituted · Nov 14, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited v.Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. et al.
· IPR2026-00130
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution for multiple IPRs involving Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited against Marlin Semiconductor Ltd., allowing the merits phase to proceed.
patent denied · Nov 14, 2025
Samsara Inc. v.Motive Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00108
The USPTO Board issued a Notice of Decisions on Institution for several IPRs, denying institution in some cases because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Nov 11, 2025
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2026-00098
Google succeeded in an IPR against Secure Communication Technologies’ ’913 patent, with the Board finding all challenged claims unpatentable as obvious over prior art.
patent · Nov 11, 2025
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2026-00098
Google has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate Secure Communication Technologies' proximity‑beacon patent, asserting that earlier patents by Mgrdechian and others anticipate or render the claims obvious. The petition seeks institution of an IPR on claims 1‑8.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Nov 11, 2025
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2026-00098
Google’s IPR against Target’s proximity‑based transaction patent resulted in the Board finding all nine challenged claims unpatentable, based on anticipation and obviousness over prior‑art wireless messaging systems.
