Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies, Inc.

IPR2026-00108

The USPTO Board issued a Notice of Decisions on Institution for several IPRs, denying institution in some cases because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.

Jurisdiction
US PTAB
Case Number
IPR2026-00108
Judge(s)
John A. Squires
Decision Date
14 November 2025

Detailed Summary

This document is a Notice of Decisions on Institution issued by the Office of the Under Secretary of Commerce. It reviews multiple Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). The Board denied institution for proceedings IPR2026-00098, IPR2026-00107, IPR2026-00108, and IPR2026-00105 because the petitioner failed to meet the reasonable likelihood of prevailing standard. Conversely, institution was granted in other listed proceedings.

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Samsara Inc. vs Motive Technologies, Inc. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentIPR2025-00162

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsSiOnyx, LLC

Samsung and SiOnyx reached a settlement that terminated the inter partes review of U.S. Patent 10,224,359 before the trial was instituted. The Board ordered the settlement and related license agreement to be kept confidential.

patentIPR2024-00692

2985 LLC d/b/a Mountain Voyage Co.vsThe Ridge Wallet LLC

The Ridge Wallet and Mountain Voyage Co. settled their IPR dispute over patent 10,791,808, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement agreement confidential.

patentIPR2025-00959

Carbyne, Inc. et al.vsTritech Software Systems et al.

Carbyne successfully instituted IPR proceedings against Tritech Software Systems regarding emergency SMS/geolocation technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds of obviousness (103) over various combinations of prior art references, including Brooks and SARLOC.

patentIPR2025-00746

Meta Platforms, Inc.vsMullen Industries LLC

Meta Platforms, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB that its claims against Mullen Industries LLC were non-obvious based on prior art (Levine). The Board instituted trial on all challenged claims related to location-based gaming and virtual reality features.

patentIPR2025-01485

TikTok Inc.vsShopSee, Inc.

This exhibit is a memorandum announcing a new PTAB policy that panels will resolve all raised grounds in final written decisions for IPRs and PGRs without oral hearings, aiming for faster, more efficient outcomes.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call