US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 10 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00110
Meta Platforms successfully challenged SitNet’s ’682 patent in an IPR, resulting in all 20 claims being found unpatentable for obviousness over Burfeind and Crowley. The patent owner did not respond, leaving the petition unopposed.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00110
Meta Platforms successfully challenged SitNet’s ’932 patent, leading the PTAB to find all ten claims unpatentable as obvious over prior‑art social‑network and advertising systems.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00113
Meta Platforms successfully invalidated SitNet’s ’932 patent claims covering targeted advertising in situational networks. The Board found all challenged claims (12‑21) obvious over Amidon, Walsh, Shahine, and Jones. The decision clears Meta’s path for its ad‑tech offerings.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00113
Meta Platforms successfully challenged SitNet’s ’682 patent, leading the PTAB to find all 20 claims unpatentable as obvious over prior‑art event‑organization and location‑based systems.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00111
Meta Platforms successfully challenged SitNet’s ’682 patent covering situational networks. The PTAB found all 20 claims unpatentable as obvious over prior art references Burfeind and Crowley. The patent owner did not respond, leaving the petitioner’s arguments unopposed.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00111
Meta Platforms successfully challenged SitNet’s ’932 patent, leading the PTAB to find all ten claims unpatentable as obvious over Amidon, Walsh, Shahine, and Jones.
patent · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00111
Meta Platforms petitions the PTAB to invalidate SitNet’s ’815 patent covering social‑network event coordination, asserting that all 30 claims are obvious over existing social‑network and event‑planning technologies.
patent · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00110
Meta Platforms petitions to invalidate SitNet’s ’769 patent covering situational networks, arguing all 30 claims are obvious over prior art. The petition cites multiple earlier patents and publications and seeks cancellation of the entire patent.
patent · Dec 11, 2025
Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. v.Kurin, Inc.
· IPR2026-00097
Magnolia Medical Technologies petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims 1‑24 of Kurin’s blood‑sample optimization device, asserting that the Bullington800 publication (alone and combined with Brancazio and Liu) anticipates or makes the claims obvious. The petition seeks institution and cancellation of all challenged claims.
patent · Dec 11, 2025
Univacco Technology Inc. v.LEONHARD KURZ Stiftung & Co., KG
· PGR2026-00011
Univacco Technology Inc. has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition seeking cancellation of 20 claims of the ‘935 decorative‑foil patent, alleging lack of enablement, insufficient written description, and indefiniteness. The petition relies on extensive expert analysis of the patent’s functional language and missing test protocols.
patent · Dec 11, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00113
Meta Platforms petitions the PTAB to invalidate all twelve claims of SitNet’s U.S. Patent 12,336,052, asserting obviousness over two sets of prior‑art references covering social‑network event handling. The petition seeks cancellation of the entire patent.
patent denied · Dec 11, 2025
Univacco Technology Inc. v.LEONHARD KURZ Stiftung & Co., KG
· PGR2026-00011
The PTAB denied institution for PGR2026-00011, finding that the petitioner failed to meet the required standard of likelihood of prevailing or unpatentability.
patent · Dec 10, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Massively Broadband LLC
· IPR2026-00032
Samsung Electronics petitions the PTAB to invalidate Massively Broadband’s ’925 patent covering a wireless‑network clearinghouse and location‑based advertising, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
Ford Motor Company v.AutoConnect Holdings LLC
· IPR2025-01524
Ford Motor Company submits an authorized response urging the PTAB to institute its IPR against AutoConnect’s ’186 patent, emphasizing settled expectations from its long‑term Flextronics partnership and AutoConnect’s maintenance‑fee lapses.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
Ford Motor Company v.AutoConnect Holdings LLC
· IPR2025-01524
Ford Motor Co. faces a PTAB Director Review petition after the Board instituted an IPR on AutoConnect’s infotainment patent. The patent owner argues Ford’s settled‑expectations narrative and claim‑construction positions are inconsistent, warranting discretionary denial of institution.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
RJ Brands, LLC d/b/a Chefman v.SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01530
RJ Brands (Chefman) has filed an IPR petition challenging SharkNinja’s dual‑air‑fryer patent, arguing lack of priority support and obviousness over four prior‑art references. The petition targets claims 1‑4 and 7‑22 and seeks to have them declared unpatentable.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
Apotex Inc. v.Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01531
Apotex has filed an IPR petition challenging all 15 claims of Ipsen’s 2017 pancreatic‑cancer treatment patent, arguing the claims are obvious over a body of prior‑art that teaches the same drug regimen.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
RJ Brands, LLC d/b/a Chefman v.SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01529
RJ Brands has filed an IPR petition challenging SharkNinja’s dual‑air‑fryer patent, arguing lack of priority support and that the claims are anticipated or obvious over Zhang, Conrad, Philips and Moon.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
American Airlines, Inc. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2025-01509
American Airlines and Southwest Airlines have filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑24 of Intellectual Ventures’ LTE‑related patent, alleging obviousness over multiple pre‑grant references. The petition cites Papasakellariou, Classon, Liu, Muharemovic, and Onggosanusi as prior art.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.Skysong Innovations, LLC
· IPR2025-01400
CrowdStrike filed an IPR petition challenging all 18 claims of Skysong Innovations’ ’721 patent, asserting obviousness over a suite of prior‑art references covering browser security, daemons, and DNS techniques. The petition seeks a finding of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent · Dec 9, 2025
Ford Motor Company v.AutoConnect Holdings LLC
· IPR2025-01524
Ford Motor Company has filed an IPR petition challenging AutoConnect’s U.S. Patent No. 9,123,186, which covers vehicle‑access control based on user accounts. The petition asserts that all 21 claims are obvious over earlier automotive restriction systems (Gratz, Bosch, Rector, Moinzadeh). The Board is asked to institute the review.
patent instituted · Dec 9, 2025
Apotex Inc. v.Ipsen Biopharm Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01531
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR involving Apotex Inc. and Ipsen Biopharm Ltd., allowing the merits of the challenge to proceed.
patent instituted · Dec 9, 2025
RJ Brands, LLC d/b/a Chefman v.SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01530
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01530 and several other proceedings after determining the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. This moves the cases forward to merits review.
patent instituted · Dec 9, 2025
RJ Brands, LLC d/b/a Chefman v.SharkNinja Operating LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01529
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01529 after determining the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. This decision is part of a larger set of institutional decisions affecting multiple related proceedings.
