US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 90 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Koki Holdings America Ltd. et al. v.Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc.
· IPR2025-00262
Koki Holdings and Kyocera Senco settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent No. 10,478,954, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings and keep the settlement confidential.
patent
Google LLC v.SoundClear Technologies LLC et al.
· IPR2025-00344
Google seeks a PTAB Director Review of SoundClear’s echo‑cancellation patent; the Patent Owner has a five‑day window to respond without new evidence.
patent
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Petitioner seeks to sustain PTAB institution of an IPR over Stratasys’s 3D‑printer patent, arguing the Board correctly applied Fintiv factors and its broad stipulation blocks discretionary denial.
patent terminated or settled
Koki Holdings America Ltd. et al. v.Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc.
· IPR2025-00261
Koki Holdings and Kyocera Senco reached a settlement over U.S. Patent 11,034,007 and jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00261, requesting the settlement be kept confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c).
patent terminated or settled
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00278
MidAmerican Energy Company and patent owner Birchtech Corp. have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,343,114, prompting a joint motion to terminate the IPR as to MidAmerican. The Board is asked to dismiss MidAmerican from the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent instituted
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00274
The PTAB instituted an inter partes review of MES, Inc.'s 10,343,114 B2 mercury‑removal patent after Berkshire Hathaway Energy and affiliates demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success on claims 1‑30, citing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent terminated or settled
Koki Holdings America Ltd. et al. v.Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc.
· IPR2025-00261
Koki Holdings America Ltd. and Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement covering U.S. Patent No. 11,034,007 and jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00261. The Board was asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
patent
Tessell, Inc. v.Nutanix, Inc.
· IPR2025-00298
Tessell, Inc. submitted an email to the PTAB Director requesting a rehearing after the Director Review denied institution of its IPR against Nutanix, Inc.
patent
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00274
Berkshire Hathaway Energy and its subsidiaries filed a joint motion with the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement with BirchTech Corp. confidential and to terminate the IPR proceeding for MidAmerican Energy.
patent terminated or settled
Entegris, Inc. v.Inpria Corporation
· IPR2025-00267
Entegris and Inpria have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 11,673,903 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board had previously instituted the proceeding but no merits were decided.
patent terminated or settled
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00281
The PTAB terminated the IPR against WEC Energy Group after the parties settled, but the case remains open for Berkshire Hathaway Energy, MidAmerican Energy and PacifiCorp. The settlement agreement is treated as business‑confidential information.
patent
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00274
BirchTech Corp. seeks Director Review of the PTAB's decision to institute an IPR against its mercury‑control patent, arguing misapplication of the time‑bar rule and that the MDL already resolves the dispute efficiently.
patent denied
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00260
The USPTO Director denied Feit Electric’s request for review of the Board’s order to deny its motion to terminate IPR2025-00260, finding the request improper under the regulations.
patent
ASUSTek Computer Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2025-00305
ASUS moves to withdraw its IPR petition after a settlement in related Roku proceedings renders the challenge moot.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Rode Microphones, LLC et al. v.Zaxcom, Inc.
· IPR2025-00230
The PTAB held that all 14 challenged claims of Zaxcom’s ‘307 patent are unpatentable, adopting broader claim constructions for “combined” and “wearable,” and granted Zaxcom’s motion to amend with substitute claims 15‑28.
patent
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Stratasys seeks Director review to overturn the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against its 3D‑printing patent, arguing the panel misapplied the Fintiv factors and over‑relied on a stipulation. The petition highlights the actual trial date, discovery investment, and identical parties as reasons for discretionary denial.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Rode Microphones, LLC et al. v.Zaxcom, Inc.
· IPR2025-00230
The PTAB held that all of Rode Microphones’ challenged claims of Zaxcom’s 8,385,814 patent are unpatentable for obviousness and granted Zaxcom’s motion to amend with substitute claims 50‑65.
patent
Entegris, Inc. v.Inpria Corporation
· IPR2025-00267
Entegris filed a motion to seal its confidential response to Inpria’s request for director review in IPR2025-00267, citing the need to protect trade‑secret information.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Rode Microphones, LLC et al. v.Zaxcom, Inc.
· IPR2025-00230
The PTAB held that claims 7,8,11,12,14,15 of Zaxcom’s ’902 patent are unpatentable under §§103 and 102, finding the asserted prior art taught each limitation. The Board also granted Zaxcom’s motion to amend, replacing the cancelled claims with narrower substitute claims 21‑26.
patent instituted
Entegris, Inc. v.Inpria Corporation
· IPR2025-00267
The PTAB instituted inter partes review of Entegris' challenge to Inpria's 11,673,903 patent covering high‑purity organotin compounds, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability.
patent
Stingray Group Inc. et al. v.Hernandez-Mondragon, Edwin et al.
· IPR2025-00351
The PTAB Director has received review requests for IPR2025-00349, -00350, and -00351. The petitioner must respond within five days, limited to five pages, with no new evidence.
patent terminated or settled
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-00280
The PTAB terminated the IPR against WEC Energy Group Inc. after the parties settled, while keeping the case alive for Berkshire Hathaway Energy and its affiliates.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.NL Giken Inc.
· IPR2025-00250
Amazon and NL Giken settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,094,236 before trial, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Koki Holdings America Ltd. et al. v.Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc.
· IPR2025-00264
Koki Holdings and Kyocera reached a settlement and jointly filed a motion to have the settlement agreement treated as confidential, requesting termination of the IPR concerning Patent 11,845,167.
