BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v. Optronic Sciences LLC

TikTok Inc. et al.vsNTECH Properties, Inc.

TikTok has filed an IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent 8,145,704, asserting that prior art references Whitehead, Cristofalo and Marcus ’904 make all 24 claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petition also argues that the Board should not exercise discretionary denial.

AT&T Services Inc. et al.vsRightQuestion, LLC

AT&T, Verizon and Nokia have filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate RightQuestion's 2023 patent on automatic number identification. They assert that the claims are obvious over prior art references Har, Miller and French, and argue that the Board should institute the review under favorable Fintiv factors.

Nokia of America Corp. et al.vsPegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

The PTAB denied institution of an IPR challenging Nokia's wireless connection patents against Pegasus Wireless. The denial was based on the Fintiv factors, citing significant investment and proximity to a parallel district court trial date.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsXiFi Networks R&D, Inc.

Samsung has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition challenging all 30 claims of XiFi’s ’756 patent, asserting obviousness, patent‑ineligible subject matter, lack of written description, and indefiniteness. The petition relies on prior art Chincholi (WO 2013/126859) and Clegg (U.S. Patent 9,055,592).

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al.vsStellar, LLC

The Director denied institution of IPRs in four related proceedings involving Motorola Solutions and Stellar, citing the substantial investment already made in a parallel district court infringement trial.