US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 47 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00906
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies jointly moved to terminate sixteen inter partes review proceedings after reaching a settlement, and the PTAB granted the termination.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Imperative Care, Inc. v.Inari Medical, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00989
The PTAB held that all nine claims of Inari Medical’s hemostasis valve patent are unpatentable. The Board’s claim construction of “filament” as a flexible element undermined the anticipation argument and found the obviousness combinations persuasive.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00906
Apple and Apex Beam have reached a confidential settlement and jointly moved to terminate the IPR concerning patent 10,965,434. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy reasons for ending the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00905
Apple and Apex Beam reached a confidential settlement and jointly moved to terminate the IPR over patent 11,917,581 covering UE and base‑station paging technology.
patent terminated or settled
Mercedes-Benz Group AG, Mercedes-Benz AG et al. v.Phelan Group, LLC
· IPR2025-00986
Mercedes-Benz and patent‑assertion firm Phelan Group filed a joint motion to terminate IPR2025‑00986 after reaching a settlement that resolves all disputes, ending the proceeding before it was instituted.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Telcom Ventures LLC
· IPR2025-00976
The USPTO denied Samsung’s petition for rehearing of the Director’s discretionary denial in a series of IPRs against Telcom Ventures. The Board affirmed the original denial, leaving the patents in force.
patent terminated or settled
Mercedes-Benz Group AG, Mercedes-Benz AG et al. v.Phelan Group, LLC
· IPR2025-00986
Mercedes‑Benz and Phelan Group settled their IPR dispute before trial, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding. The settlement agreement was deemed confidential business information.
patent
Carbyne, Inc. et al. v.Tritech Software Systems et al.
· IPR2025-00959
Carbyne, Inc. sought a rehearing of the Director Review in IPR2025-00959, but the USPTO denied the request. The decision leaves the original patent enforcement order in place.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.
· IPR2025-00936
Samsung contests the patent owner’s arguments that the Lee and Choudhury references do not teach the claimed BSS‑color disabling features. The petitioner seeks denial of the patent owner’s Director Review request, keeping the IPR instituted.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00904
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies entered a confidential settlement that led to the joint termination of sixteen inter partes review proceedings covering Apex Beam’s patents. The Board granted the joint motion, treating the settlement agreements as confidential.
patent denied
Geotab Inc. et al. v.FRACTUS, S.A.
· IPR2025-00929
The USPTO denied Geotab’s request for rehearing of its IPR challenge against Fractus’s telematics patent, upholding the earlier discretionary denial and institution refusal.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Telcom Ventures LLC
· IPR2025-00974
The USPTO denied Samsung’s request for rehearing of a director’s discretionary denial in IPR2025‑00974 and related cases, leaving Telcom Ventures’ patents untouched.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00903
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies settled sixteen inter partes review proceedings covering patent 11,546,110. The Board granted joint motions to terminate the IPRs and ordered the settlement agreements to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00903
Apple and Apex Beam have reached a confidential settlement and jointly moved to terminate the IPR over U.S. Patent 11,546,110 covering multi‑antenna transmission technology.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00900
Apple and Apex Beam reached a settlement that terminated 16 inter partes review proceedings covering multiple patents. The Board granted the joint motion, treating the settlement documents as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00901
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies jointly moved to terminate sixteen IPRs after reaching a settlement. The Board granted the motion, treating the settlement agreements as confidential. No claim merits were decided.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00898
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies entered a settlement that led to the joint termination of sixteen inter partes review proceedings, including IPR2025-00898 covering patent 10,951,271. The Board granted the motion to terminate under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Telcom Ventures LLC
· IPR2025-00972
The USPTO denied Samsung’s petition for rehearing of the Director’s discretionary denial and institution denial in a series of IPRs against Telcom Ventures. The Board affirmed the earlier decisions, leaving the challenged patents intact.
patent
Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-00951
The Director has initiated a sua sponte review of the Board’s institution decision in IPR2025‑00951, citing claim‑construction issues. The petition was filed by Generac and co‑petitioners against Champion Power’s generator patent.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.W&Wsens Devices Inc.
· IPR2025-00996
The USPTO denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution decisions in IPR2025-00995 and IPR2025-00996, leaving the institution denial in place.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00897
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies jointly moved to terminate sixteen inter partes review proceedings after reaching a confidential settlement, and the PTAB granted the termination.
patent terminated or settled
Wise PLC et al. v.--
· IPR2025-01045
Wise PLC and Intercurrency Software LLC settled their IPR dispute over Patent 11,620,701, leading the PTAB to dismiss the case before a trial was instituted. The settlement resolved all claims and the proceeding was terminated.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00895
Apple and Apex Beam Technologies entered a settlement, leading the PTAB to terminate IPR2025-00895 covering U.S. Patent 10,568,113. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and kept the settlement documents confidential.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00894
Apple’s IPR petition was granted, instituting review of all 20 claims of Apex Beam’s 5G paging patent. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on prior art You, Liu, and Mallick.
