US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 46 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Atrius Development Group Corp. v.ABC IP, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01473
Atrius has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate ABC IP’s forced‑reset trigger patent (US 12,038,247) by arguing the claims are obvious over earlier patents and publicly posted YouTube videos that disclose a three‑position selector.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. v.Marlin Semiconductor Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01484
TSMC has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑6 of Marlin Semiconductor’s ’510 FinFET patent, asserting obviousness over four prior‑art references. The petition presents three grounds, each invoking 35 U.S.C. § 103, targeting the entire claim set.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2025-01486
Apple has filed a petition for inter‑partes review of U.S. Patent 8,918,127, asserting that all 20 claims are obvious over prior‑art messaging systems. The petition relies on Horvath and Tsampalis publications and seeks cancellation of the claims.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Airwallex Pty. Ltd. et al. v.--
· IPR2025-01446
Airwallex has filed a petition for inter partes review seeking cancellation of all 16 claims of U.S. Patent 11,620,701, alleging obviousness over five prior‑art references. The petition follows multiple infringement lawsuits in Texas that rely on the same patent.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Liberty Energy Inc. et al. v.U.S. Well Services, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01445
Liberty Energy has petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against U.S. Well Services’ hydraulic fracturing patent, arguing that claims 1‑14 are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition seeks cancellation of all challenged claims under 35 U.S.C. §103.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.MessageLoud, Inc.
· IPR2025-01430
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 14 claims of MessageLoud’s ’964 patent, alleging obviousness over Boelter, Gruber and Polak. The petition argues that prior‑art systems already disclosed in‑vehicle message queuing, audio playback and user controls.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.MessageLoud, Inc.
· IPR2025-01429
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 24 claims of MessageLoud’s ’775 patent, arguing the claims are obvious over Boelter, Gruber, and Polak. The petition requests institution and cancellation of the claims.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.MessageLoud, Inc.
· IPR2025-01426
Apple petitions an IPR to invalidate 25 claims of MessageLoud's 9,591,117 patent covering hands‑free message notification, citing Boelter, Gruber and Polak as prior art.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.MessageLoud, Inc.
· IPR2025-01427
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 24 claims of MessageLoud’s ’725 patent, alleging obviousness over Boelter, Gruber and Polak. The petition requests institution and cancellation of the entire claim set.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.MessageLoud, Inc.
· IPR2025-01428
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 25 claims of MessageLoud’s ’728 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior‑art references Boelter, Gruber and Polak. The petition requests institution of the review and cancellation of the claims.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Apple Inc. v.COBBLESTONE WIRELESS LLC,
· IPR2025-01497
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging Cobblestone Wireless’s 2011 patent covering simultaneous transmission over multiple RF frequencies, asserting obviousness over Rofougaran and Shearer references.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01487
Infineon has filed an IPR petition challenging all 21 claims of MOSAID’s ’381 flash memory patent, asserting obviousness over the Grundy and Kilbuck references. The petition includes a detailed claim‑by‑claim analysis and an expert declaration.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Citrix Systems, Inc. et al. v.K.Mizra LLC
· IPR2025-01468
Citrix and Cloud Software Group have filed a petition to invalidate K.Mizra’s network‑security patent, asserting that all 19 claims are obvious over established prior‑art combinations.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01315
Samsung has filed a petition for inter partes review seeking cancellation of all 15 claims of Maxell’s U.S. Patent 8,471,950. The petition alleges obviousness over three prior‑art references—Tsujino, Shui, and Iwasaki—across three separate grounds.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01312
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all eight claims of Maxell’s ’645 video‑processing patent. The petition relies on obviousness over the Kim and Fujimura references.
patent · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01314
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 16 claims of Maxell’s ’198 patent covering digital image playlist creation, alleging obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition outlines six grounds, each pairing specific claim groups with combinations of earlier patents.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Nicholson Manufacturing Ltd. et al. v.BID GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
· PGR2025-00081
The USPTO Board issued mixed institution decisions across multiple IPR and PGR proceedings. Several cases were granted for trial based on likelihood of prevailing, while others were denied due to lack of merit or discretionary concerns.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01487
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Infineon against MOSAID regarding patent 9,972,381 B1, setting the stage for trial.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01487
The USPTO granted institution for five IPR/PGR proceedings after determining the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. Other cases were denied based on resource efficiency or lack of merit likelihood.
patent denied · Aug 29, 2025
Atrius Development Group Corp. v.ABC IP, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01473
The PTAB denied institution of IPR2025-01473 for Atrius Development Group Corp. against ABC IP, LLC because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claims.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2025-01431
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01431 after reviewing the merits and finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. Other proceedings were denied based on discretionary or non-discretionary factors.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01315
The USPTO Board granted institution for IPR2025-01315 after determining the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim. The decision is part of a larger notice covering multiple institution decisions across various proceedings.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01314
The USPTO Board granted institution for IPR2025-01314 after determining the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent instituted · Aug 29, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-01312
The USPTO Board granted institution for IPR2025-01312 after reviewing the merits, finding that the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
