US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 355 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent denied · Jan 31, 2024
Tesla, Inc. v.Relink US LLC
· IPR2024-00389
Tesla's IPR challenge against Relink US LLC was denied by the PTAB, failing to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The Board found that key prior art references (Serban and Somani) did not sufficiently teach or suggest the claimed features related to frequency-based power adjustment in grid-tied photovoltaics.
patent denied · Jan 31, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Carbyne Biometrics, LLC
· IPR2024-00333
The PTAB denied Apple Inc.'s IPR petition against Carbyne Biometrics, LLC's patent. The Board found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or § 103.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jan 30, 2024
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00508
Apple successfully challenged Immersion’s haptic‑feedback patent in an IPR, resulting in ten claims being found obvious over the Burrough prior‑art reference.
patent denied · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00516
Aylo Freesites filed a Director Review request after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against DISH Technologies’ streaming patent, alleging misapplication of General Plastic factors and discretionary denial errors.
patent denied · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00518
The USPTO Director denied Aylo Freesites' request for review of the denial to institute an IPR against DISH Technologies' patent 9,407,564, leaving the original institution decision intact.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00516
Aylo Freesites Ltd seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute its IPR against DISH Technologies’ multi-bitrate streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the strong prior art reference “Leaning.” The petition requests reversal and institution of the review.
patent terminated or settled · Jan 30, 2024
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. v.10x Genomics, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00526
Bruker Spatial Biology and 10x Genomics settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,542,554, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review. The settlement agreement and related documents were ordered confidential.
patent denied · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00512
The USPTO Director denied Aylo Freesites' request for review of the PTAB's denial of institution in IPR2024-00512 against DISH Technologies.
patent instituted · Jan 30, 2024
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00511
Motorola Solutions and STA Group filed a joint motion requesting the PTAB keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The motion argues the agreement contains highly sensitive business information.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00514
Aylo Freesites seeks a Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s discretionary denial of its IPR petition challenging DISH Technologies’ multi-bitrate streaming patent. The petitioner argues the Board failed to consider the merits of the Leaning reference and misapplied General Plastic factors.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00515
Aylo Freesites seeks Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR petition against DISH Technologies' streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the merits of the "Leaning" prior art.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00458
Microsoft filed a Director Review Request challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution in IPR2024-00458 against LiTL’s patent. The petitioner alleges arbitrary evaluation of references and inconsistency with a prior panel decision.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00457
Microsoft filed a Director Review Request challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution in IPR2024-00457 against LiTL’s patent 9,880,715. The petitioner alleges arbitrary reasoning and inconsistency with a prior panel decision.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00457
Microsoft and other petitioners seek Director review of a PTAB denial to institute an IPR on U.S. Patent 9,880,715, alleging the Board misapplied obviousness standards and treated the case inconsistently with a related granted IPR.
patent terminated or settled · Jan 30, 2024
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00511
Motorola Solutions and STA Group settled their IPR dispute over Patent 9,319,852, leading to a joint motion that terminated the proceeding. The Board granted the motion and ordered the settlement agreements to be kept confidential.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00519
Court decision.
patent denied · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00513
The USPTO denied Aylo Freesites’ petitions for Director Review of the institution decisions in several IPRs, including IPR2024-00513 covering patent 10,757,156. The denial leaves the original institution decisions unchanged.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. v.10x Genomics, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00526
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. and 10x Genomics jointly asked the PTAB to file their settlement agreement as business‑confidential information and keep it separate from the patent file. The request invokes 35 U.S.C. § 317 and related regulations to protect the settlement details.
patent terminated or settled · Jan 30, 2024
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. v.10x Genomics, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00526
Bruker Spatial Biology and 10x Genomics have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,542,554, filing a joint motion to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not issued a final decision, and the parties seek to keep the settlement confidential.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00519
Aylo Freesites Ltd seeks Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against DISH Technologies' adaptive‑rate streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the merits of the Leaning prior art.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00519
Aylo Freesites Ltd has petitioned the PTAB Director to review the Board’s denial of institution in IPR2024‑00519, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and Fintiv considerations.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00518
Aylo Freesites filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB's denial of institution for IPR2024-00518, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored merits. The Board had denied institution under discretionary grounds.
patent · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00518
Aylo Freesites seeks Director Review after the PTAB denied its IPR petition on DISH Technologies’ adaptive‑streaming patent, arguing the Board improperly ignored the merits and misapplied General Plastic factors.
patent denied · Jan 30, 2024
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00517
The USPTO Director denied Aylo Freesites' petitions for review of the institution decisions in multiple IPRs, including the challenge to DISH Technologies' patent 11,677,798.
