Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

Fortinet, Inc.vsNetskope, Inc.

Fortinet has petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Netskope’s 7,593,936 patent, asserting that all 22 claims are anticipated or obvious over Honig, Oliphant, and Vinberg. The petition seeks cancellation of the entire claim set.

Juniper Networks, Inc.vsPortsmouth Network Corporation

Juniper Networks filed a petition challenging the validity of Portsmouth Network Corporation's '986 patent, arguing that its method for rapid network reconfiguration is obvious. The petitioner asserts that combining existing prior art related to dummy frames and fault recovery messaging renders the claimed invention unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al.vsYangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

Micron Technology successfully secured the institution of an IPR against Yangtze Memory Technologies' patent 11,101,276 B2. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Micron can prove obviousness over prior art references like Kim and Fang.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMaxell, Ltd.

Samsung Electronics challenged Maxell's touch interface security patent (8982086), arguing obviousness over prior art including Rogers and Rosenberg. The PTAB found reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for several claims, leading to the institution of the IPR and granting trial on specific claims.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsWilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.

The USPTO denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2025-01043, leaving the patent owner’s claims intact.