US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 354 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00378
The PTAB issued an Institution Decision for IPR2024-00378, finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The petitioner challenged claims 1-15 of the '930 patent related to trading platforms and currency conversion.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00377
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Intercurrency Software LLC's patent 10062107, challenging claims 19-36 based on obviousness (103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success for the petitioner regarding at least one challenged claim, advancing the dispute into the trial phase.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00375
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against Intercurrency Software LLC's '863 patent, challenging all twelve claims based on obviousness (103). The Board found that the Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one claim challenged in the Petition.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00376
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Intercurrency Software LLC's patent (10062107) on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success regarding Claim 1, leading to the institution of all 18 claims at issue.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00369
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute trial in its IPR against Calabrese Stemer LLC's credit card authorization patent (7954706). The Board found sufficient evidence of anticipation and obviousness across multiple claims, leading to a favorable outcome for the Petitioner.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00368
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against Calabrese Stemer LLC, asserting that the '564 patent' claims are anticipated by prior art (Horie). The Board found sufficient likelihood of success regarding Claim 1 based on the prior art disclosure of card usage status notifications.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00367
The PTAB instituted trial on all four claims of patent 7357310 after finding a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner, Askeladden L.L.C., would prevail under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and § 103. The grounds relied heavily on the prior art reference 'Horie' to anticipate and render obvious the mobile payment authorization claims.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD. v.ATI Technologies ULC
· IPR2024-00366
TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. successfully challenged ATI Technologies ULC's patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, focusing on obviousness over multiple prior art combinations. The PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of success for the petitioner on specific grounds, leading to an institution decision.
patent instituted · Feb 1, 2024
SHENZHEN PINCAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-00340
Shenzhen Pincan Technology challenged The Ridge Wallet's patent (10791808) for obviousness over prior art, successfully securing an IPR institution decision. The Board rejected the Patent Owner's arguments regarding real parties in interest and time bar issues.
patent final · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00378
The PTAB issued a final decision finding all 15 challenged claims unpatentable based on obviousness (Section 103). The Board concluded that the claimed electronic trading platform features were predictable combinations of prior art references, specifically Calo, Rude, Sellberg, Szoc, and Davidowitz.
patent final · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00377
The PTAB issued a final decision finding claims 19-36 unpatentable based on obviousness over combinations of prior art references. The Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the combination of Calo, Rude, and Sellberg was sufficient to teach key limitations in electronic trading/forex methods.
patent final · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00376
The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding that all 18 claims of the '107 patent were unpatentable over various combinations of prior art. Petitioner successfully argued obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) based on references like Calo, Rude, and Sellberg in the field of Electronic Trading/Currency Exchange.
patent final · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00375
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all 12 challenged claims of the '863 patent unpatentable. The petitioner successfully demonstrated obviousness over various combinations of prior art references in the field of Electronic Trading Platforms.
patent Final Written Decision · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00369
The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding all seven challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,954,706 B2 unpatentable by a preponderance of the evidence. The grounds included anticipation (102) and obviousness (103), utilizing prior art references such as Horie, Kano, and Kobayashi.
patent Final Written Decision · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00368
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all nine claims unpatentable by anticipation (102) over the prior art reference Horie. The Board adopted a broad construction of 'distinct,' allowing for channel overlap, which supported the Petitioner's argument that the reference disclosed every element of the claims.
patent Final Written Decision · Feb 1, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Calabrese Stemer LLC
· IPR2024-00367
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all four challenged claims unpatentable. The Board determined that the prior art reference, Horie, anticipated the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102. This decision relates to Mobile Payment Authorization technology and is tied to related District Court litigation.
patent instituted · Jan 31, 2024
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00532
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. filed a Petition challenging claims of LiTL LLC's '688 Patent, arguing that the portable computing device technology is obvious in light of various prior art combinations. The petition asserts that existing references disclose all elements of the invention, rendering the patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent null · Jan 31, 2024
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
· IPR2024-00520
Dexcom, Inc. initiated this IPR petition against Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s patent, challenging multiple claims based on obviousness. The core argument is that the patented features are merely predictable combinations of prior art references (Stafford, Raymond, and Turner).
patent instituted · Jan 31, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Carbyne Biometrics, LLC
· IPR2024-00507
Apple Inc. challenged Carbyne Biometrics, LLC's patent (11475105) in a Petition, arguing that the claimed authentication and data backup methods are obvious over various combinations of prior art. The petitioner successfully secured institution at the PTAB, setting up an IPR proceeding to challenge the validity of the claims.
patent null · Jan 31, 2024
Tesla, Inc. v.Relink US LLC
· IPR2024-00389
Tesla challenges Relink US LLC's '755 Patent in an IPR, alleging that the claims are anticipated by Serban and rendered obvious by combinations of prior art. The petition details multiple grounds under 102 and 103 across all 20 claims, focusing on grid-tied photovoltaic power management systems.
patent null · Jan 31, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Carbyne Biometrics, LLC
· IPR2024-00333
Apple challenges Carbyne Biometrics' patent 11475105 in a PTAB petition, arguing that the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petitioner asserts that combinations of prior art references like Kesanupalli and Cheng render multiple claims unpatentable.
patent denied · Jan 31, 2024
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00532
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. failed to convince the PTAB that a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA) would be motivated to modify Lane's hinge mechanism using Misawa's single-pivot design. The Board denied institution, finding that the proposed modification would destroy the intended functionality of the original invention.
patent denied · Jan 31, 2024
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
· IPR2024-00520
Dexcom failed to convince the PTAB that Abbott's glucose monitoring patent was unpatentable based on obviousness grounds. The Board denied institution, finding insufficient evidence across multiple prior art combinations.
patent denied · Jan 31, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Carbyne Biometrics, LLC
· IPR2024-00507
The PTAB denied Apple's IPR challenge against Carbyne Biometrics, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness. The denial hinged on the Petitioner's inability to provide sufficient motivation to combine prior art references for authentication and credential management claims.
