US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 290 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Aesthetic Management Partners, LLC et al. v.HydraFacial LLC
· IPR2025-01169
The USPTO Board granted institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR2025-01169), allowing the petitioner to proceed to trial against the challenged patent.
patent denied
AT&T Services, Inc. et al. v.USTA Technology, LLC
· IPR2025-01166
The USPTO Board denied the institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) filed by AT&T Services against USTA Technology's patent RE47720.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.
· IPR2025-01165
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01165, allowing Samsung Electronics to proceed with challenging Wilus Institute's patent. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim.
patent denied
Viant Technology LLC et al. v.AlmondNet, Inc.
· IPR2025-01163
The USPTO Director denied institution for multiple Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions, including IPR2025-01163. No trial will be instituted in these proceedings.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.
· IPR2025-01164
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01164, allowing Samsung to proceed against Wilus regarding patent 12004262. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01161
The USPTO Director denied institution for multiple Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings, meaning no trials will proceed in these cases.
patent denied
LiveIntent, Inc. et al. v.AlmondNet, Inc.
· IPR2025-01160
The USPTO Director denied institution for the IPR challenge against AlmondNet's patent 8494904, meaning no trial will proceed on this matter.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The USPTO Board denied institution for multiple IPR petitions, including one involving Google LLC and Valtrus Innovations Limited. No trial will proceed on these matters.
patent denied
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01154
The USPTO denied institution of IPR petitions filed by ASUSTeK against Nokia, preventing the trial on patentability issues.
patent instituted
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01153
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01153, allowing ASUSTeK to challenge Nokia's patent 10536714 after demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01152
The USPTO Board denied institution for multiple Inter Partes Review proceedings, meaning no trials will proceed on the challenged patents.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01151
The USPTO Director denied institution for multiple Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings, preventing trials in these cases.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01150
The USPTO Board denied institution for multiple IPR petitions, halting the review process before any trial could begin.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01149
The USPTO Director denied the institution of IPR proceedings, including one involving Apple Inc., meaning no trial will proceed on the challenged patent claims.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01148
The USPTO Director denied institution for multiple IPR proceedings, including one involving Apple Inc. and CardWare Inc., meaning no trial will proceed on the challenged patents.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01147
The USPTO Director denied institution for several IPR proceedings involving Apple Inc. and CardWare Inc., meaning no trial will take place.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01146
The USPTO Director denied Apple Inc.'s request to institute an IPR against CardWare Inc.'s patent 10339520, ending the current phase of the proceeding.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.CardWare Inc.
· IPR2025-01145
The USPTO Board denied institution of the IPR petition filed by Apple Inc. against CardWare Inc.'s patent 10339520, meaning no trial will proceed.
patent denied
ProAmpac Holdings Inc. v.Sigma Technologies Int'l, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01143
The PTAB denied institution of IPR2025-01143 for ProAmpac Holdings Inc., finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claims.
patent denied
Microsoft Corporation et al. v.Lemko Corporation
· IPR2025-01142
The USPTO Board denied institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings involving Microsoft and Lemko, meaning no trial will proceed.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.LS Cable & System Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01141
The USPTO Board denied institution of the IPR for Apple Inc. against LS Cable & System Ltd., finding that Apple failed to meet the legal threshold required to proceed with the challenge.
patent instituted
Evenflo Company, Inc. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01140
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01140 and related proceedings after determining the petitioner met the likelihood of prevailing standard. This moves the cases forward to merits review.
patent denied
United Therapeutics Corporation v.Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01139
The PTAB denied institution for IPR2025-01139, preventing United Therapeutics Corporation from challenging Actelion's patent 8268847.
patent denied
Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd. v.Corning Incorporated
· IPR2025-01137
The USPTO Board denied the institution of IPR proceedings initiated by Caihong Display Devices against Corning regarding patent 8627684.
