US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 289 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01207
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01207 after the petitioner met the likelihood of prevailing standard, but all related proceedings are currently stayed pending Director Review.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01206
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01206 after reviewing the petitioner's likelihood of prevailing. However, all related proceedings are currently stayed pending a Director Review.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01205
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01205, allowing the challenge to proceed despite a stay pending related Director Reviews.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01204
The Board granted institution for the IPR against XiFi Networks' patent 11818591, allowing Samsung to proceed with its challenge. The trial is currently stayed pending review by the Director.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01203
The Board granted institution for the IPR against XiFi Networks' patent 11849337, allowing Samsung Electronics to proceed with its challenge, though the trial is currently stayed.
patent instituted
Arla Foods amba v.Leprino Foods Company et al.
· IPR2025-01199
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01199 involving Arla Foods amba and Leprino Foods Company et al., allowing the challenger to proceed with challenging patent 11825860.
patent instituted
Guangzho EKO Trading Development Co., Ltd. (aka EKO Development Ltd.) et al. v.Nine Stars Group (U.S.A.) Inc.
· IPR2025-01191
The PTAB instituted IPR proceedings against Nine Stars Group (U.S.A.) Inc., finding a reasonable likelihood that claims 1-24 of patent 10822165 are anticipated or obvious over the prior art reference Wang. The Board accepted Petitioner's arguments regarding functional equivalency, particularly concerning 'automatic driving arrangement' and components like the servo motor.
patent denied
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al. v.Genzyme Corporation et al.
· IPR2025-01195
The USPTO Director denied institution for several Inter Partes Review petitions, including one concerning Sarepta Therapeutics and Genzyme Corporation's patent 7704721.
patent denied
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al. v.Genzyme Corporation et al.
· IPR2025-01194
The USPTO Board denied the institution of IPR proceedings (IPR2025-01194) involving Sarepta Therapeutics and Genzyme Corporation, meaning no trial will proceed on the challenged patent.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01190
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR case involving Samsung Electronics against Hannibal IP LLC regarding patent 11641661. The petitioner successfully met the reasonable likelihood of prevailing standard.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Samsung Electronics successfully secured institution in an IPR against Hannibal IP LLC's patent 11272535. The proceeding is currently stayed pending a Director Review of related decisions.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01189, allowing Samsung Electronics to challenge Hannibal IP's patent, though the proceeding is currently stayed.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01187
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01187, allowing Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. to proceed against Hannibal IP LLC's patent 11057896.
patent denied
MWE Investments, LLC et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01185
The USPTO denied institution for IPR2025-01185 after a merits review, finding the petitioner could not show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. This decision is part of a larger notice covering multiple institutional decisions.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
The PTAB denied Google LLC's request to institute inter partes review against Secure Communication Technologies, LLC regarding patent 11687971.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01182
The PTAB denied Google LLC's request to institute an IPR against Secure Communication Technologies, LLC regarding patent 11443344.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01181
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR challenge brought by Google LLC against Secure Communication Technologies' patent 11334918.
patent instituted
Apple Inc v.1LSS Inc.
· IPR2025-01180
The USPTO Board granted institution for IPR2025-01180, allowing the trial to proceed after determining the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
patent instituted
CentralSquare Technologies, LLC v.Carbyne, Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01179
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01179 after reviewing the petitioner's likelihood of prevailing. This decision allows the case to proceed to trial.
patent denied
Ascentcare Dental Products, Inc. v.Solmetex, LLC
· IPR2025-01175
The PTAB denied Ascentcare Dental Products' IPR petition against Solmetex, LLC's dental device patent due to procedural timing issues. The Board found the patent was a post-AIA patent and the petition was filed too early.
patent instituted
Topsoe, Inc. et al. v.L'AIR LIQUIDE, SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME POUR L'ETUDE ET L'EXPLOITATION DES PROCÉDÉS GEORGES CLAUDE
· IPR2025-01173
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01173, allowing the challenger to proceed to trial. However, all proceedings are currently stayed pending a Director Review of related decisions.
patent denied
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01171
The Director denied institution of an IPR against MOSAID's patent, ruling that Infineon failed to adequately explain conflicting claim construction positions taken in district court litigation.
patent instituted
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01171
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01171, allowing Infineon to challenge MOSAID's patent 7051306.
patent denied
Amazon.com, Services LLC v.VB Assets, LLC
· IPR2025-01167
The USPTO Director denied the institution of an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition filed by Amazon.com against VB Assets' patent 11087385.
