US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 291 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
Aerin Medical Inc. v.Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01127
The USPTO Office Director denied institution of inter partes review (IPR2025-01127) for the challenged patent, meaning no trial will proceed on the claims.
patent denied
Aerin Medical Inc. v.Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01126
The USPTO Director denied institution for several Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions, including IPR2025-01126. This procedural denial means no trial will be held on the challenged patents.
patent denied
Aerin Medical Inc. v.Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01125
The USPTO Board denied the institution of several IPR petitions, meaning no trials will proceed for these challenges.
patent denied
Aerin Medical Inc. v.Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01124
The USPTO Director denied institution for the IPR proceedings involving Aerin Medical Inc. and Neurent Medical Ltd., halting further trial.
patent instituted
Evenflo Company, Inc. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01122
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01122 after reviewing the petitioner's likelihood of prevailing. This moves the case forward to a merits trial.
patent denied
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
The PTAB denied institution of IPR2025-01121 in the dispute between Harbor Freight Tools and Champion Power Equipment because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent denied
Belden Inc. et al. v.CommScope Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01119
The PTAB denied institution for the IPR challenge against CommScope's patent 10996417.
patent instituted
Albany International Corp. v.Voith Patent GmbH
· IPR2025-01116
Albany International Corp. successfully instituted IPR proceedings against Voith Patent GmbH regarding patent number 11261566, challenging all 15 claims based on obviousness (103). The Board found sufficient evidence to support the Petitioner's arguments that combinations of prior art references render the claimed features predictable in textile manufacturing.
patent denied
Belden Inc. et al. v.CommScope Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01119
The PTAB denied institution for IPR2025-01119 involving Belden Inc. et al. and CommScope Technologies LLC, finding the petitioner failed to meet the reasonable likelihood of prevailing standard.
patent denied
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-01118
The Director denied institution for multiple IPR petitions filed by Union Electric Company et al. against MES, Inc., preventing a trial from taking place.
patent denied
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-01117
The Director denied the institution of multiple IPRs filed by Union Electric Company against MES, Inc., meaning no trial will proceed on the challenged patent claims.
patent denied
Snap, Inc. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01114
The USPTO Board denied institution for the IPR challenge brought by Snap, Inc. against Nokia's patent 8175148.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.
· IPR2025-01111
Samsung Electronics successfully petitioned for IPR against Wilus Institute's patent, 10911186, covering multi-user uplink transmission. The PTAB found reasonable likelihood of obviousness over prior art references Kim, Chu, and Choi across all 18 challenged claims. This institution decision sets the stage for a full trial on technical merit.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc.
· IPR2025-01110
Samsung Electronics successfully secured institution at the PTAB against Wilus Institute's patent 11716171, challenging claims 1-16 based on obviousness over Kim and Chu/Choi. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Samsung could prove unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent denied
Monahan Products, LLC (dba UPPAbaby) et al. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01106
The USPTO denied institution for an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding involving Monahan Products and Baby Jogger regarding patent 9403550.
patent denied
Ascentcare Dental Products, Inc. v.Solmetex, LLC
· IPR2025-01104
Ascentcare Dental Products, Inc.'s IPR petition against Solmetex, LLC's dental device patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board ruled that Petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding obviousness over prior art references like Black and Park/Baughan/Johnson.
patent denied
Monahan Products, LLC (dba UPPAbaby) et al. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01105
The USPTO Board denied the institution of an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition filed by Monahan Products against Baby Jogger regarding patent 8955869.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01103
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies LLC's patent (8230101), challenging claims 7-12 based on obviousness over multiple prior art combinations. The Board found that the Petition met the reasonable likelihood standard, particularly regarding how Lamkin discloses key limitations related to content location and tree structure.
patent instituted
Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.
· IPR2025-01087
Orca Security Ltd. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Wiz, Inc.'s patent covering AI Model Risk Detection. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing based on obviousness over the combination of Shua and Lang patents.
patent instituted
Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.
· IPR2025-01085
Orca Security Ltd. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Wiz, Inc., challenging claims related to External Attack Surface Management (EASM). The Board adopted the petitioner's arguments that the claimed methods are obvious over prior art combining Calvo and Nguyen.
patent denied
Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.
· IPR2025-01086
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR challenge against Wiz, Inc.'s cybersecurity patent (12001549) because the petitioner, Orca Security Ltd., maintained inconsistent claim construction positions across different legal forums.
patent instituted
Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.
· IPR2025-01084
Orca Security Ltd. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR on all 29 claims of Wiz, Inc.'s patent based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board found that a combination of Ross, Agarwal, and Biran teaches every limitation of Claim 1, establishing a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability.
patent denied
Orca Security Ltd. v.Wiz, Inc.
· IPR2025-01083
Orca Security Ltd.'s IPR challenge against Wiz, Inc.'s patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Orca failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claim, specifically regarding the required 'list of abnormal connections' feature.
patent instituted
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited v.Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01082
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR challenging patent 6888181, allowing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited to proceed against Marlin Semiconductor Ltd. et al.
