US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 29 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
FRESH PRODUCTS, LLC v.SANASTAR INC.
· IPR2025-01339
Fresh Products sent a formal notice terminating its manufacturing agreement with Sanastar’s WizKid Products, citing the contract’s 90‑day termination clause. The exhibit was filed in IPR2025‑01339 as supporting evidence.
patent
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
Google petitions the PTAB to invalidate Proxicom's 8,385,913 patent, asserting that the claimed server‑mediated device‑identifier exchange is fully anticipated or obvious over earlier patents. The petition lists multiple grounds under §§102 and 103 and argues against discretionary denial.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
Google’s IPR against Secure Communication Technologies’ 8,369,842 patent resulted in all nine challenged claims being found unpatentable, based on anticipation and obviousness over Mgrdechian and related references.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01207
The PTAB denied XiFi Networks' request for Director Review to overturn institution decisions in multiple IPRs involving Samsung, finding no good cause and applying the Revvo precedent.
patent
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01333
Meta Platforms seeks Director Review of a denied IPR on patent 9,263,039. The patent owner, Dialect, argues for discretionary denial, citing the patent’s expiration, settled expectations, and the copycat nature of the petition. The Board has not yet ruled on the request.
patent
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
Google has filed an IPR petition challenging Secure Communication Technologies' patent on wireless device identifier exchange. The petition argues anticipation and obviousness over Mgrdechian and Kulakowski references and seeks institution of the review.
patent terminated or settled
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01334
Meta Platforms and Dialect have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,398,209. The parties filed a joint motion to stay all deadlines while they finalize the settlement and prepare dismissal filings.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The PTAB held that Google’s challenge to Valtrus’s 7,748,005 patent succeeded, finding all twenty claims unpatentable for lack of written‑description support and obviousness over the McCarthy application and Gien micro‑kernel reference.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01207
XiFi Networks seeks an out‑of‑time Director Review to vacate the institution of eleven IPRs/PGRs against Samsung, arguing that Samsung’s contradictory claim‑construction positions in the district court undermine its PTAB petitions.
patent
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01333
Meta Platforms filed a Request for Director Review to vacate the PTAB’s denial of institution of an IPR against Dialect’s 9,263,039 speech‑recognition patent. The petition argues that a settlement in the parallel Bank of America case makes the PTAB the first forum, and that the parent ’160 patent’s unpatentability for lacking a multi‑pass speech‑recognition limitation should extend to the child ’039 claims.
patent terminated or settled
TOP GLORY TRADING GROUP INC. et al. v.Cole Haan LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01394
Exhibit 2002 documents the settlement agreement between Top Glory Trading Group, DP Dream Pairs, and Cole Haan, concluding IPR2025-01394.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01205
The PTAB denied XiFi Networks’ request for Director Review of the institution decisions in multiple IPRs filed by Samsung, leaving the institution orders in place.
patent
Regions Bank v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2025-01326
Regions Bank and USAA have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 12,159,310 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The Board has not yet ruled on the merits, and the parties argue that termination aligns with statutory policy and practice.
patent denied
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-01324
Birchtech Corp. opposes Union Electric’s request for Director Review of a denied IPR on its mercury‑control patent, arguing the Director’s decision is final and that joinder and stay requests are procedurally improper.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The PTAB held that Google proved all 21 claims of Valtrus’s ’454 patent are obvious over Colby, Eilert, and Jindal, rendering the entire patent unpatentable.
patent
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
Google petitions the PTAB to invalidate Secure Communication Technologies' proximity‑based payment patent, arguing that the claims are anticipated or obvious over earlier wireless transaction systems.
patent denied
Capital One, N.A. et al. v.Wapp Tech Corp. et al.
· IPR2025-01325
Wapp Tech successfully opposed Capital One’s request for Director Review of the USPTO’s denial to institute an IPR, arguing the petitioner misapplied statutory requirements and presented no valid procedural violations.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01205
XiFi Networks asks the PTAB to vacate the institution of eleven IPRs and PGRs against Samsung, arguing Samsung’s contradictory claim‑construction positions in the district court and before the Board violate recent Revvo precedent. The request seeks out‑of‑time Director Review to terminate the proceedings.
patent terminated or settled
Regions Bank v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2025-01356
Regions Bank and USAA settled their inter partes review dispute over USAA’s automobile‑insurance patent. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the IPRs and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
TOP GLORY TRADING GROUP INC. et al. v.Cole Haan LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01393
Exhibit 2002 contains the settlement agreement between Top Glory Trading Group, DP Dream Pairs and Cole Haan, indicating the IPR has been resolved.
patent
Capital One, N.A. et al. v.Wapp Tech Corp. et al.
· IPR2025-01325
Capital One challenges the PTAB Director’s denial of institution for patent 8,924,192, asserting statutory violations and procedural defects. The petition highlights failure to consider required briefing, lack of a three‑member panel, and missing APA compliance. It seeks vacatur of the decision and a proper institution ruling.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.DivX, LLC
· IPR2025-01223
Amazon and its AWS affiliate filed an unopposed motion to withdraw their IPR against DivX’s 11,611,785 video‑streaming patent. The Board has not yet institutioned the case, and DivX does not oppose the withdrawal. The motion seeks termination of the proceeding for efficiency.
patent denied
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-01323
The USPTO denied Union Electric’s request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2025-01323, keeping the institution decision intact.
patent denied
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY et al. v.MES, Inc.
· IPR2025-01322
The USPTO Director denied Union Electric's request for review of the institution decisions in several IPRs, including the challenge to patent 10,668,430. The order affirms the earlier denial of institution.
