US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 28 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v.OMNI MEDSCI, INC.
· IPR2025-01254
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision on remand, holding that all 23 claims of Omni MedSci’s wearable pulse‑oximeter patent are unpatentable. The Board relied on an obviousness analysis over a combination of prior‑art references and affirmed the claim construction of “identify an object.”
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v.OMNI MEDSCI, INC.
· IPR2025-01253
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision on Remand, finding all 23 claims of Omni MedSci’s wearable pulse‑oximeter patent unpatentable. Apple’s arguments on obviousness over multiple prior‑art references prevailed.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Paneltouch Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01245
BOE Technology and Paneltouch Technologies have settled IPR2025-01245. The parties filed a joint motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential and separate from the public docket.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Paneltouch Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01245
BOE Technology Group and Paneltouch Technologies have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,250,758. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR proceeding, citing the settlement and judicial economy.
patent terminated or settled
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01229
Microsoft and Dialect settled the IPR concerning patent 7,634,409 before the Board could institute a trial. The joint motion to terminate was granted and the settlement agreement was kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01351
Microsoft and Dialect, LLC jointly moved to terminate IPR 2025-01351 before institution, citing a settlement that resolves all disputes. The Board has not yet made an institution decision, and the parties seek confidentiality for the agreement.
patent
Apple Inc. v.Telcom Ventures LLC
· IPR2025-01233
Apple Inc. filed a motion to dismiss its IPR petition against Telcom Ventures LLC’s ’708 patent, arguing that the Board has not yet decided on institution and that dismissal will conserve resources. The motion references the related district‑court litigation where the patent was dismissed with prejudice.
patent terminated or settled
Hisense USA Corporation et al. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2025-01329
Hisense and VideoLabs settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,769,238. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceeding and ordered the related license agreement to be kept confidential.
patent
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01229
A statistical study of 192 IPR final written decisions from 2021 shows that patents invalidated in IPRs have unusually high numbers of prior‑art citations and often rely on new references introduced during the post‑grant proceeding. Expert testimony and novel evidence play a key role in the Board’s unpatentability findings.
patent
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01229
Microsoft and Dialect jointly filed a motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under trade‑secret rules. The request cites statutory authority to limit public disclosure of the agreement.
patent terminated or settled
Snap Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01345
Snap Inc. and Nokia Technologies Oy have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 9,036,701 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential under statutory authority.
patent denied
BPI Labs, LLC et al. v.Eli Lilly & Co.
· IPR2025-01346
Eli Lilly successfully defended its tirzepatide patent after the PTAB denied BPI Labs' request for Director Review of the institution denial, citing strong settled expectations and proper exercise of discretion.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Radian Memory Systems LLC
· IPR2025-01350
Samsung Electronics and Radian Memory Systems settled their IPR disputes before trial, resulting in the termination of seven pending IPRs, including IPR2025-01350 covering patent 11,740,801.
patent denied
Microsoft Corporation v.Dialect, LLC
· IPR2025-01229
The USPTO denied Microsoft’s petition to institute an Inter Partes Review of Dialect’s patents, citing the age of the patents, subsidiary ownership issues, and a parallel district‑court case.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Radian Memory Systems LLC
· IPR2025-01350
Samsung and Radian Memory Systems have reached a confidential settlement and jointly filed a motion to terminate the IPR on patent 11,740,801. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding without a merits decision.
patent terminated or settled
Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01228
Generac, Harbor Freight, and MWE have settled their IPR dispute with Champion Power over a dual‑fuel selector switch. They filed a joint request to keep the settlement agreement confidential and to withdraw from the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Snap Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01345
Snap and Hisense settled their disputes with Nokia over patents 9,036,701 and 11,805,267. The Board granted joint motions to terminate, ending the IPRs before institution.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.Vampire Labs, LLC
· IPR2025-01215
Apple and Vampire Labs have reached a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent 8,358,103, and they have jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Sonos, Inc.
· IPR2025-01213
The USPTO Director denied Google’s request for review of the decision that refused to institute an IPR against Sonos’s audio patent.
patent
Google LLC v.Sonos, Inc.
· IPR2025-01213
Google has filed a Request for Director Review challenging the USPTO’s denial of its IPR petition against Sonos’s audio‑player patent, alleging procedural violations of the APA, improper delegation of authority, and fee‑setting misalignment.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.XiFi Networks R&D, Inc.
· IPR2025-01209
XiFi Networks requests an out‑of‑time Director Review to vacate the institution of eleven IPRs and three PGRs against Samsung, arguing Samsung’s contradictory claim‑construction positions violate recent PTAB precedent.
patent terminated or settled
Volex plc v.CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.
· IPR2025-01387
Volex and Credo Technology Group settled their IPR disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings before trial and keep the settlement confidential.
patent denied
Ford Motor Company v.AutoConnect Holdings LLC
· IPR2025-01342
Ford Motor Company filed a response urging the PTAB Director to deny AutoConnect Holdings’ request for review of a prior discretionary denial. Ford relies on long‑standing settled expectations from its relationship with Flextronics and AutoConnect’s lapse of maintenance fees to argue the request should be denied.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-01183
Google succeeded in an IPR against Secure Communication Technologies' ’913 patent, finding all challenged claims unpatentable as obvious over multiple prior‑art references.
