Amphenol Corporation v. Credo Technology Group Ltd.

Zesty.ai, Inc.vsAon Re, Inc.

Zesty.ai has filed a petition for inter partes review seeking cancellation of all claims of Aon Re’s U.S. Patent 11,030,491. The challenger argues the claims are obvious over the Gross publication alone or in combination with Furukawa or Davis, asserting that the invention merely applies conventional image‑processing and machine‑learning techniques.

Apple Inc.vsSmith Interface Technologies, LLC

The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision on the IPR, finding claims 30 and 62 unpatentable while upholding the patentability of claims 1, 32, 34, and 64. The Board clarified that 'the gesture' must refer to a single input with a common starting point, rejecting the Petitioner’s argument for multiple gestures.

SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al.vsFeit Electric Company, Inc.

Feit Electric seeks Director Review to vacate the institution of two consolidated IPRs covering its LED lighting patent, citing failure to disclose a Chinese parent company and contradictory claim‑construction arguments by the petitioners.

Imperative Care, Inc.vsInari Medical, Inc. et al.

In an IPR, the PTAB held that all nine claims of Inari Medical’s hemostasis valve patent are unpatentable under §§102 and 103, finding the petitioner’s anticipation and obviousness arguments persuasive.

fuboTV Media Inc. et al.vsDISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

Petitioners fuboTV Media and Yanka Industries filed an authorized response opposing DISH’s Director Review request on patent 10,757,156. They argue the Board’s decision was correct, that DISH raised new and irrelevant theories, and that the request should be denied.