US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 213 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent final · Mar 18, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00701
The PTAB issued a final decision rejecting the petitioner's challenge to claims 1-23 of U.S. Patent No. 10715878. The Board found that the evidence failed to demonstrate unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103, upholding the patent owner’s rights regarding targeted advertising methods.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco’s IPR against Video Solutions’ video‑encoding patent was instituted, but the patent owner seeks Director Review, alleging the Board ignored evidence, introduced new arguments, and misapplied the Fintiv compelling‑merits standard.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo and Ericsson have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,425,817 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo and Ericsson settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 10,425,817, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding. The settlement agreement was ordered to be kept confidential.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo and Ericsson have jointly filed a motion to keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory provisions, seeking business‑confidential treatment separate from the public patent file.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco Systems and Video Solutions settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,649,426, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement agreement confidential.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco and Video Solutions have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,649,426 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites public‑policy reasons and the Board’s guidance favoring settlement.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco and Video Solutions jointly requested confidentiality for their settlement agreement and moved to terminate IPR2024-00695 concerning patent 8,649,426.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
2985 LLC d/b/a Mountain Voyage Co. v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-00692
The Ridge Wallet and Mountain Voyage Co. settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,791,808 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board was urged to terminate based on public policy favoring settlement and the lack of any merits decision.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Capital One, National Association et al. v.--
· IPR2024-00643
Capital One and Hulu filed an unopposed motion to keep their settlement with Implicit confidential and to end the IPR over patent 8,056,075. The motion cites 35 U.S.C. §317 and related regulations.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00627
Amazon and Nokia have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,805,267. They jointly filed a request to treat the settlement documents as business confidential information and to terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Capital One, National Association et al. v.--
· IPR2024-00643
Capital One filed an unopposed motion to terminate IPR2024-00643 concerning patent 8056075. The Board has not yet ruled, but the motion seeks dismissal of the proceeding.
patent denied · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00626
The USPTO Director denied Amazon's request for review of the institution decisions in two IPRs involving Nokia's patent 11,805,267. The order affirms that the institution decisions stand.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Chris Hoff of Barnes & Thornburg filed a Director Review request on behalf of VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. after the Board instituted IPR2024-00695 against Cisco Systems. The owner contends the Board’s sua sponte arguments merit a higher‑level review.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
2985 LLC d/b/a Mountain Voyage Co. v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-00692
The Ridge Wallet and Mountain Voyage Co. settled their IPR dispute over patent 10,791,808, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00626
Amazon and Nokia settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,805,267 B2, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review after the parties jointly requested termination and sought confidentiality for the settlement documents.
patent · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00627
Amazon has filed a petition for rehearing, asking the Director to vacate the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against Nokia’s video‑coding patent covering bi‑prediction. Nokia argues the Board erred under § 325(d) by revisiting arguments already considered during prosecution.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Capital One, National Association et al. v.--
· IPR2024-00643
Hulu and Capital One settled their dispute with patent owner Implicit over U.S. Patent 8,056,075 B2. The PTAB granted a motion to terminate the IPR and ordered the settlement agreements kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00626
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,805,267 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy benefits of settlement.
patent null · Mar 15, 2024
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo challenged Ericsson's patent on IMSI encryption technologies before the PTAB, arguing that the claims are obvious in light of prior art. The petitioner relies on combinations of Nair and Forsberg, along with 3GPP standards, to demonstrate lack of non-obviousness. This petition asserts that existing knowledge made the claimed security enhancements predictable.
patent null · Mar 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco Systems, Inc. filed a Petition challenging the validity of patent 8649426 owned by VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD., asserting that the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that prior art references Perlman and Oguz teach known solutions for reducing video encoding latency, rendering the claimed methods unpatentable.
patent instituted · Mar 15, 2024
Capital One, National Association et al. v.--
· IPR2024-00643
Capital One National Association filed an IPR challenging Implicit, LLC's patent 8056075 on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. §103). The petition asserts that the claims are rendered unpatentable by various combinations of prior art references including Fowlow and Kimera.
patent null · Mar 15, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00627
Amazon challenges Nokia's video coding patent (11805267), arguing that the claimed weighted bi-directional motion prediction is anticipated by prior art. The petitioner relies heavily on Karczewicz references to demonstrate that using higher precision for intermediate calculations was already known in the field.
patent instituted · Mar 15, 2024
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo successfully convinced the PTAB to institute an IPR against Ericsson's patent (10425817) covering 5G security protocols. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing based on combinations of prior art references, leading to a trial proceeding.
