US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 214 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Sep 26, 2024
Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v.GoPro, Inc.
· IPR2024-01434
Arashi Vision (Insta360) has filed an IPR petition challenging GoPro’s D789,435 design patent for a camera, asserting obviousness over a range of prior‑art designs and urging the Board not to deny institution under FINTIV or § 325(d).
patent denied · Sep 26, 2024
Decent Espresso International Ltd. v.DUVALL ESPRESSO IP ENFORCEMENT, LLC
· IPR2024-01492
The PTAB denied Decent Espresso International Ltd.'s IPR challenge against DUVALL ESPRESSO IP ENFORCEMENT, LLC's infused beverage brewing assembly patent. The Board rejected the petitioner's claim construction of 'resulting solvent valve,' upholding the single-valve interpretation required by the patent owner.
patent instituted · Sep 26, 2024
Slack Technologies, LLC et al. v.Wrinkl, Inc.
· IPR2024-01490
Slack and Salesforce successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Wrinkl's group messaging patent (11973731). The Board accepted arguments that the claims are unpatentable by anticipation or obviousness over prior art, including Kakuta.
patent instituted · Sep 26, 2024
Slack Technologies, LLC et al. v.Wrinkl, Inc.
· IPR2024-01489
Slack and Salesforce successfully secured institution in an IPR against Wrinkl, Inc., challenging 30 claims based on anticipation by the 'Cohen' prior art. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing under 35 U.S.C. § 102, moving the case toward trial.
patent denied · Sep 26, 2024
Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v.GoPro, Inc.
· IPR2024-01434
The PTAB denied institution of Arashi Vision's IPR against GoPro, finding that the petition lacked sufficient particularity and failed to meet the burden of proof for prior art. The Board emphasized that design grounds require focusing on overall visual impression rather than individual features.
patent denied · Sep 26, 2024
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01389
Tableau Software's IPR challenge against iCharts LLC was denied by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found insufficient evidence that prior art references taught or suggested the claimed interactive data visualization features.
patent denied · Sep 26, 2024
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01388
Tableau Software's IPR challenge against iCharts LLC was denied by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, specifically regarding combining prior art references.
patent instituted · Sep 26, 2024
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01387
Tableau Software successfully instituted an IPR against iCharts LLC regarding patent 8271892 for data visualization technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim based on the preliminary record, advancing the challenge to trial.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v.Vervain, LLC
· PGR2024-00048
Phison Electronics petitions the PTAB to invalidate Vervain’s ‘546 NAND‑flash patent, asserting abstract‑idea, lack of written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness grounds. The petition relies on extensive expert declaration and prior‑art references. The Board has yet to decide whether to institute the review.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v.Vervain, LLC
· PGR2024-00048
Micron has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate Vervain’s 10,950,300 flash‑memory patent, asserting that all twelve claims are obvious over prior‑art references Dusija and Sutardja.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. v.Axsome Malta Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01418
Hikma Pharmaceuticals and the patent owners filed a joint motion asking the PTAB to treat their settlement agreement as confidential business information, keeping it separate from the patent file. The request relies on 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and related regulations.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 25, 2024
HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. v.Axsome Malta Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01418
Hikma Pharmaceuticals filed an IPR against Axsome Malta’s 11,560,354 patent. The parties settled the dispute early and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding. The Board granted the motion and ordered the settlement agreement to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 25, 2024
HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. v.Axsome Malta Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01418
Hikma Pharmaceuticals filed a joint motion with Axsome Malta to terminate IPR2024‑01418 after reaching a confidential settlement, resulting in dismissal of the petition before institution.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v.Vervain, LLC
· PGR2024-00048
Phison Electronics has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of all seven claims of Vervain’s ‘612 NAND flash memory patent, alleging lack of written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness. The petition relies on extensive prior‑art patents and technical literature covering hybrid SLC‑MLC flash systems.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
Decent Espresso International Ltd. v.DUVALL ESPRESSO IP ENFORCEMENT, LLC
· IPR2024-01483
Decent Espresso International seeks to invalidate all twelve claims of U.S. Patent 11,576,524 covering espresso‑machine temperature control, arguing they are obvious over the Startz patent and multiple coffee‑machine references. The petition relies on expert testimony and enumerates four §103 grounds.
patent · Sep 25, 2024
HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. v.Axsome Malta Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01418
Hikma Pharmaceuticals has filed an IPR petition challenging Axsome’s U.S. Patent 11,560,354 covering solriamfetol compositions. The petition alleges obviousness of claims 1‑8 based on three prior‑art references and argues against discretionary denial of institution.
patent denied · Sep 25, 2024
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v.Vervain, LLC
· PGR2024-00048
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION's petition challenging Vervain, LLC's NAND Flash Memory patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found the specification sufficiently supported the claims against indefiniteness and written description challenges, and Petitioner failed to meet the likelihood standard for obviousness.
patent denied · Sep 25, 2024
Decent Espresso International Ltd. v.DUVALL ESPRESSO IP ENFORCEMENT, LLC
· IPR2024-01483
Decent Espresso International Ltd. failed its IPR challenge against Duvall Espresso's brewing system patent, as the Board found insufficient evidence that the prior art rendered the invention obvious. The institution decision denied the petition, maintaining the validity of the core claims related to infused beverage preparation.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SiOnyx, LLC
· IPR2024-01431
Samsung and SiOnyx jointly moved to terminate IPR2024‑01431 after reaching a settlement, also requesting the settlement documents be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SiOnyx, LLC
· IPR2024-01430
Samsung and SiOnyx jointly moved to terminate the IPR over patent 11,069,737 before any trial. The Board granted the motion, dismissing the petition under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Harbor Island Dynamic, LLC
· IPR2024-01404
Samsung filed an authorized response opposing Harbor Island Dynamic’s request for Director Review of the PTAB’s final decision. The brief asserts the Board properly weighed evidence, did not abuse discretion, and that claim construction was unnecessary. The Director is urged to deny the review request.
patent · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Harbor Island Dynamic, LLC
· IPR2024-01404
Samsung seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s Final Written Decision that cancelled all claims of Harbor Island Dynamic’s TSV patent. The patent owner contends the Board erred by ignoring expert evidence, failing to construe a claim term, and inventing unsupported modifications to prior art.
patent · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Harbor Island Dynamic, LLC
· IPR2024-01404
Court decision.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 24, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SiOnyx, LLC
· IPR2024-01431
Samsung Electronics and SiOnyx reached a settlement, leading the PTAB to terminate IPR2024-01431 concerning patent 11,069,737 B2. The settlement agreement is kept confidential per statutory requirements.
