Short Summary
The PTAB Director denied Tableau Software's request for review of the institution decision in IPR2024-01389, leaving iCharts LLC's patent 8,520,000 intact.
Detailed Summary
In a rehearing proceeding, the PTAB Director reviewed Tableau Software's petition to overturn the denial of institution in IPR2024-01389, which concerns patent 8,520,000 owned by iCharts LLC. After evaluating the petition and the parties' responses, the Director ordered that the requests for Director Review be denied, thereby maintaining the original institution denial. No substantive claim constructions or prior art references were addressed in this order.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in Tableau Software, LLC et al. vs iCharts LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Globus Medical, Inc.vsSpinelogik, Inc.
Globus Medical has filed a petition for inter partes review of Spinelogik’s U.S. Patent 8,460,385 covering a spinal fusion device. The challenger asserts that the claims are obvious over prior‑art implants (Moskowitz, Hess) and a combination with Steffee’s curved fasteners, and seeks cancellation of claims 1‑5, 7 and 9.
EP Family Corp.vsOffice Kick Inc.
EP Family Corp. and Office Kick Inc. filed a joint motion to terminate IPR2025-00471 concerning patent 11,849,843. The parties indicate they have settled, seeking dismissal of the proceeding.
Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. et al.vsMicron Technology, Inc. et al.
The USPTO Director denied Yangtze Memory's request for Director Review of the PTAB's denial of institution in four IPRs, including the case involving Micron's patent 10,475,737.
Cambridge Industries USA Inc. et al.vsApplied Optoelectronics, Inc.
Cambridge Industries has filed an IPR petition challenging all 17 claims of Applied Optoelectronics’ 10,313,024 optical‑module patent, asserting anticipation by two prior‑art references and urging the Board to institute review despite discretionary denial arguments.
Apple Inc.vsGinko LLC
Apple Inc.'s IPR petition against Ginko LLC was denied by the PTAB, as the Board found insufficient evidence that cited prior art disclosed the claimed contact permission settings.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.