US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 128 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01139
Amazon and Nokia have settled their IPR over Nokia's wireless‑technology patent and jointly request that the settlement documents be kept confidential, asking the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01141
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 8,036,273 and filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01140
Amazon and Nokia have settled their IPR over U.S. Patent 7,280,599 and have jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement documents be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01151
Dyson and Omachron settled their inter partes review disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate four IPRs involving Dyson patents. The settlement agreement is treated as confidential business information.
patent terminated or settled
Hecht, Thomas v.Carver Edison, Inc.
· IPR2024-01135
The petitioner and Carver Edison, Inc. settled their inter partes review before trial, resulting in a joint motion to dismiss and termination of the proceeding. The Board granted confidentiality for the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01041
Verizon, T‑Mobile, AT&T and Headwater Research have settled all disputes over U.S. Patent 8,924,543 and filed a joint motion to terminate the inter‑partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' request for Director Review, asserting that Beijing Electronics Holdings is not a real party in interest and that the patent owner delayed raising RPI issues. The Board’s prior rulings supporting BOE’s RPI identification are reaffirmed, and the Director Review request is urged to be denied.
patent terminated or settled
Hartmann US Inc. et al. v.Tabone, Maurice
· IPR2024-01037
Hartmann US Inc., Brødrene Hartmann A/S, and The Happy Group Inc. jointly moved to terminate IPR2024‑01037 after reaching a confidential settlement with patent owner Maurice J.P. Tabone. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under its discretionary authority.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
Samsung Display and BOE have filed a joint motion to terminate the ITC investigation into OLED display modules, citing a confidential settlement that resolves all disputes. The Board is asked to end the case under statutory settlement provisions.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01088
The USPTO Director denied Apple’s request for a review of the IPR’s Final Written Decision, leaving the decision against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC in place.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01132
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' request for Director Review, asserting that BOE is the sole real party in interest and that the patent owner's RPI arguments are untimely and unsupported.
patent
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01094
Pictiva Displays has filed a Director Review request to overturn the PTAB’s institution of its display‑panel patent claims after the Board relied on a rescinded Guidance Memo. The owner argues the Board should have applied a full Fintiv analysis given the parallel district‑court trial schedule.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01132
Optronic Sciences requests Director Review of an IPR against its patent, arguing that BOE’s state‑linked controller Beijing Electronics Holdings was not disclosed as a real party in interest. The patent owner cites recent Director decisions that tighten RPI requirements and seeks vacatur of the Board’s decision and termination of the IPR.
patent denied
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01132
The PTAB denied Optronic Sciences LLC’s request to file a motion for reconsideration of the institution decision in IPR2024-01132. The Board found no extraordinary circumstances and applied the new Director’s Memorandum, leaving the institution in place.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01131
BOE Technology Group and Optronic Sciences settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 7,226,801 B2. The Board terminated the proceeding by joint motion, citing good cause and confidentiality considerations.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01131
Samsung Display and BOE have filed a joint motion to terminate the ITC investigation into OLED display modules, citing a confidential settlement that resolves all disputes. The Board is asked to grant termination under settlement‑friendly policy.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-01036
Samsung and ASUS have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,291,052 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and public policy favors termination after settlement.
patent terminated or settled
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01128
Nike and SherryWear jointly moved to terminate multiple IPRs after reaching a confidential settlement. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement agreement to remain confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01033
Samsung, Harman and Staton Techiya settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,750,965. The Board terminated the proceeding by joint motion and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
Optronic Sciences LLC seeks Director Review to vacate the Board’s decision in IPR2024-01130, arguing that BOE’s disclosed controller, BEH, makes the RPI issue unresolved. The petition cites recent Director memoranda that shift the burden to the petitioner to identify all RPIs.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01032
Samsung and Staton Techiya have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,683,643, filing a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya, LLC
· IPR2024-01033
Samsung Electronics and Staton Techiya have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the IPR over U.S. Patent 11,750,965. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01032
Samsung, Harman and ST CasesTech entered a joint settlement, leading the PTAB to terminate eight related IPRs without a final decision. The Board granted confidentiality for the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
Samsung Display and BOE have filed a joint motion to terminate the ITC investigation over OLED display modules, citing a confidential settlement that resolves all disputes.
