US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 124 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Curtis Industries, LLC et al. v.B & D TECHNOLOGIES LLC
· IPR2024-01150
B & D Technologies defends its lawn‑mower cab patent by asserting that the “rear wall” term means the interior rear wall and that the petitioner’s prior‑art references are not novel, seeking a discretionary denial of the IPR.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01151
Dyson and Omachron have settled their IPR dispute and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential under statutory authority.
patent terminated or settled
Curtis Industries, LLC et al. v.B & D TECHNOLOGIES LLC
· IPR2024-01150
Curtis Industries and B & D Technologies have jointly moved to terminate IPR 2024‑01150 after reaching a settlement, citing 35 U.S.C. §317(a). The Board has not yet decided the merits, and related district‑court litigation was dismissed.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01140
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over Nokia’s U.S. Patent No. 7,280,599 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy reasons for termination.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01141
Amazon and Nokia filed a joint motion to terminate four IPRs after reaching a settlement. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement documents to be kept confidential.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-01217
Samsung and Asus filed a joint request to have their IPR settlement materials treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The motion seeks to keep the settlement separate from the public file and limit access to government agencies or parties with good cause.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01139
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,950,469 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion relies on 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and argues that termination saves resources and aligns with public‑policy goals.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01134
Samsung Display and BOE have reached a settlement that resolves all disputes in an ITC investigation concerning OLED display modules, prompting a joint motion to terminate the case.
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K.Mizra Inc.
· IPR2024-01236
Silicon Motion and K.Mizra settled their IPR dispute over patent 10,331,379 before trial, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K.Mizra Inc.
· IPR2024-01236
Silicon Motion and K.Mizra have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,313,379 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is expected to grant the termination.
patent denied
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC
· IPR2024-01224
Lenovo’s request for Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute its IPR against Intellectual Ventures was rejected. The denial leaves the institution decision unchanged.
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K.Mizra Inc.
· IPR2024-01236
Silicon Motion and K.Mizra jointly moved to dismiss their IPR and asked the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory provisions.
patent instituted
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-01101
Aylo Freesites successfully obtained institution of an IPR against WellcomeMat’s 8,307,286 patent covering video cue‑point editing for real‑estate marketing, with the Board finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability and rejecting discretionary‑denial arguments.
patent
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01206
Motorola Solutions filed an authorized response defending the PTAB’s institution decision against Stellar’s request for Director Review. The brief argues that the Board correctly applied the Fintiv factors, that the rescinded Guidance Memo is irrelevant, and that no abuse of discretion occurred.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
Optronic Sciences requests Director Review of a PTAB decision, contending that BOE’s undisclosed state‑linked controller violates RPI requirements. The petition cites recent Director policy that makes such omissions fatal. The request seeks vacatur of the decision and termination of the IPR.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
BOE Technology Group and Optronic Sciences settled their IPR disputes, leading the Board to grant withdrawal of pending Director Review requests for the three IPRs.
patent denied
Head Sport GmbH v.Vermont Safety Developments LLC
· IPR2024-01099
Vermont Safety Developments LLC successfully defended its ski‑binding patent against Head Sport GmbH’s IPR petition. The Board denied institution, finding the petition deficient in claim construction, §112(f) analysis, and obviousness particularity, and citing unfavorable discretionary factors.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01233
Dyson and Omachron have settled the IPR over U.S. Patent 9,301,666 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01132
Samsung Display and BOE have entered a settlement that resolves all disputes in the ITC investigation of OLED display modules, prompting a joint motion to terminate the case. The parties argue that termination aligns with public interest and statutory authority.
patent
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC
· IPR2024-01224
Lenovo petitions the PTAB Director to overturn a denied institution decision, arguing that the Board misapplied the Hulu "reasonable likelihood" standard and failed to recognize the Dammann paper as prior art. The request seeks institution of an IPR against Intellectual Ventures' OFDM patent.
patent terminated or settled
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01131
BOE Technology and Optronic Sciences have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,226,801 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites settlement and judicial economy as reasons for termination.
patent terminated or settled
3Shape A/S et al. v.Medit Corporation et al.
· IPR2024-01276
3Shape and Medit settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 9,245,374. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the proceedings and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' Director Review request, asserting it is the only real party in interest and that BEH lacks control. The petition highlights PO's untimely filing and new arguments, seeking denial of the request.
patent instituted
Qualcomm Incorporated et al. v.Network System Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01081
The PTAB granted Qualcomm’s joinder request and instituted inter partes review of Network System Technologies’ NoC patent, covering claims 2,6,9‑16.
