US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 123 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01341
An email from the PTAB Director informs TikTok and NTECH Properties that Director Review requests for IPR2024-01341 and IPR2024-01343 have been received, setting a five‑business‑day deadline for a brief response and prohibiting new evidence.
patent terminated or settled
Olympus Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01220
Optimum Imaging Technologies and Fujifilm have reached a settlement-in-principle, seeking a stay of court deadlines and planning to file a stipulation of dismissal.
patent
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01173
Dr. Squatch argues that the PTAB correctly rejected P&G’s attempts to reinterpret claim language and that the challenged deodorant stick claims are obvious over prior art. The petition also rebuts P&G’s RPI argument, maintaining that Dr. Squatch was the sole real party in interest.
patent terminated or settled
Olympus Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01220
Olympus and Optimum Imaging have reached a settlement-in-principle in their imaging patent dispute, seeking a stay of court deadlines and planning to dismiss the case.
patent
LEDUP MANUFACTURING GROUP LTD. v.Seasonal Specialties, LLC
· IPR2024-01258
LEDup Manufacturing filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit challenging the PTAB’s decision that claims 3 and 8 of its ‘252 patent remain patentable.
patent
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01174
Dr. Squatch challenges P&G’s request to overturn the PTAB’s findings that claim 8 of the ’706 deodorant‑stick patent is obvious. The petitioner argues the Board correctly applied the ASTM D‑1321 standard and rejected P&G’s RPI arguments.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01314
The PTAB Director sent an email informing Motorola Solutions and Stellar that Director Review requests have been filed for IPR2024-01284, 01285, 01313, and 01314, and that the petitioner must respond within five business days with a five‑page limit and no new evidence.
patent terminated or settled
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01300
Harman and ST CasesTech have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,589,329 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy reasons to end the proceeding.
patent
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01162
Dyson and Omachron have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,903,546 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and prior Board guidance to support termination.
patent denied
Hulu, LLC et al. v.Piranha Media Distribution, LLC
· IPR2024-01252
The PTAB denied Hulu’s petition to institute an IPR against a peer‑to‑peer gaming patent, finding the petition failed the compelling‑merits test. The Board concluded the cited prior art did not teach key claim limitations, resulting in a discretionary denial under § 314(a).
patent
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Collision Communications, Inc.
· IPR2024-01248
Samsung has filed a Request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution of an IPR against Collision Communications’ wireless signaling patent. The petitioner alleges the Board misapplied prior art references and erred in finding a lack of particularity. Samsung seeks reversal of the denial.
patent denied
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
The PTAB Director denied Early Warning Services’ request for a rehearing of the institution decision on Intellectual Ventures’ patent 7,314,167, leaving the institution intact.
patent terminated or settled
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.NL GIKEN INCORPORATED
· IPR2024-01161
Amazon and its affiliates settled an inter partes review against NL Giken’s patent 9,319,615. The Board terminated the proceeding, treating the settlement as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Arista Networks, Inc. v.Orckit Corporation
· IPR2024-01239
Arista Networks and Orckit Corporation jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-01239 after reaching a settlement that resolves all disputes over patent 10,652,111. The Board granted the motion and ordered the settlement agreement to remain confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K. Mizra LLC
· IPR2024-01241
Silicon Motion and K. Mizra settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 9,111,608. The Board terminated the proceeding without deciding the merits, treating the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-01160
Honda and Infogation settled their dispute, prompting the PTAB to dismiss IPR2024-01160 before institution. The Board granted the joint motion to dismiss and ordered the settlement kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K. Mizra LLC
· IPR2024-01241
Silicon Motion and patent owner K. Mizra filed a joint request to dismiss their IPR and keep the dismissal agreement confidential. The Board was asked to treat the agreement as business‑confidential information under §317(b).
patent terminated or settled
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K. Mizra LLC
· IPR2024-01240
Silicon Motion and K. Mizra have jointly moved to terminate the IPR over patent 9,160,466 following a settlement that resolves their dispute.
patent
Silicon Motion Inc. et al. v.K. Mizra LLC
· IPR2024-01240
Silicon Motion and K. Mizra filed a joint request to treat their settlement agreement as confidential and to dismiss the pending IPR. The motion cites statutory confidentiality protections.
patent terminated or settled
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-01160
Honda and Infogation settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,292,743, prompting a joint motion to dismiss the pending IPR before it was instituted.
patent terminated or settled
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01233
Dyson and Omachron settled their inter partes review disputes before the PTAB instituted the trial, resulting in termination of the proceedings and confidentiality of the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled
Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01181
Lenovo and Motorola Mobility settled their IPR challenge to Headwater Research’s patent 10,749,700, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Reolink Digital Technology Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01154
Reolink Digital Technology Co., Ltd. filed a motion to withdraw its IPR petition against U.S. Patent 8,314,481. The petition is being withdrawn, ending the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-01156
National Beef and Institute for Environmental Health settled four inter partes reviews covering patents 7,534,584; 8,822,143; 9,637,771; and 9,845,486. The Board terminated the proceedings based on a written settlement agreement and granted confidentiality for the agreement.
