US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 70 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00582
Apple and ImberaTek have jointly filed a motion to terminate the IPR covering patent 9,107,324, citing a settlement agreement and good cause under PTAB precedent. The motion seeks to end the pre‑institution proceeding to conserve resources.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00578
Apple and patent holder ImberaTek have settled their dispute over patent 7,989,944 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR. The motion relies on good‑cause authority to dismiss the pre‑institution proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Tesla, Inc. v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2025-00638
Tesla and patent‑assertion entity Intellectual Ventures II have jointly moved to dismiss the IPR and terminate the proceeding after resolving the dispute in a parallel district‑court case. The motion cites Board authority and the early, unbriefed status of the IPR as reasons for dismissal.
patent terminated or settled
LG Electronics, Inc. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00519
LG Electronics and Maxell settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,421,188 B2. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR, and the Board granted the termination before instituting a trial.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00581
Apple and ImberaTek settled their inter partes review disputes covering eight patents. The Board terminated all IPRs and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Amgen Inc. et al. v.Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
· IPR2025-00602
The PTAB notified Amgen and Bristol‑Myers Squibb that Director Review requests have been filed for IPR2025‑00601 and IPR2025‑00602, setting a five‑day deadline for a limited response and prohibiting new evidence.
patent
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00581
Apple and ImberaTek filed a joint request asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement for the 8,368,201 patent dispute confidential and only disclose it under strict conditions.
patent
LG Electronics, Inc. et al. v.Maxell, LTD.
· IPR2025-00520
LG Electronics and Maxell have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,244,284 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy benefits of settlement.
patent
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v.iCashe, Inc.
· IPR2025-00642
Samsung filed a Director Review request after the USPTO denied institution of multiple IPRs targeting iCashe’s mobile‑payment patent. The petition seeks rehearing and submits P‑TACTS requests to keep the challenges alive.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00580
Apple and ImberaTek have jointly filed a motion to terminate the pending IPR over U.S. Patent 8,222,723 following a settlement of their broader dispute. The Board is asked to dismiss the pre‑institution proceeding on good‑cause grounds.
patent
LG Electronics, Inc. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00519
LG Electronics and Maxell have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00519, requesting the settlement be treated as business confidential information.
patent terminated or settled
LG Electronics Inc. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00518
LG Electronics and Maxell settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,856,760 B2, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPR before a trial was instituted.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00578
Apple and ImberaTek settled their inter partes review disputes before any trial began. The Board granted the joint motions to terminate nine IPRs and ordered the settlement agreement to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Koninklijke KPN N.V.
· IPR2025-00512
Samsung Electronics and KPN settled their disputes and jointly moved to terminate six inter partes review proceedings, including IPR2025-00512 covering U.S. Patent 8,881,235. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement agreement to be kept confidential.
patent
NVIDIA Corporation v.Neural AI, LLC
· IPR2025-00606
The PTAB denied NVIDIA’s request for rehearing of its challenge to Neural AI’s patent, upholding the earlier discretionary denial and institution refusal.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00580
Apple and ImberaTek settled their disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate nine inter partes review proceedings before any institution decision. The settlement agreement was ordered to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
LG Electronics Inc. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00518
LG Electronics and Maxell have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 6,856,760 and jointly moved to have the settlement agreement treated as business confidential information, effectively terminating the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00577
Apple and ImberaTek settled their disputes, leading the PTAB to terminate a series of inter partes reviews covering multiple patents before any institution decision was made.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Koninklijke KPN N.V.
· IPR2025-00504
Samsung and KPN have reached a confidential settlement and jointly moved to terminate the IPR over U.S. Patent 8,459,151, citing public‑policy reasons for early termination.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Koninklijke KPN N.V.
· IPR2025-00504
Samsung and KPN settled all patent disputes by executing a settlement, license and non‑assertion agreement that grants Samsung worldwide rights to KPN’s patents and ends the IPR proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00575
Apple and ImberaTek settled their disputes covering nine patents, leading the PTAB to terminate all related IPRs before institution. The settlement agreement was ordered to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Apple Inc. v.ImberaTek, LLC
· IPR2025-00576
Apple and ImberaTek settled their inter partes review disputes before the PTAB could institute a trial. The Board granted the joint motions, treated the settlement as confidential, and terminated the proceedings.
patent denied
Rode Microphones, LLC et al. v.Zaxcom, Inc.
· IPR2025-00557
The PTAB denied RØDE Microphones' request for rehearing of its institution denial, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate any Board error regarding the interpretation of Strub’s genlocking technique.
patent
Anthony Inc. v.ControlTec, LLC
· IPR2025-00559
ControlTec, LLC seeks Director review to deny institution of an IPR against its 18‑year‑old anti‑sweat controller patent, arguing strong settled expectations and non‑material prior art.
