US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 342 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00435
The PTAB instituted the IPR, finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for Comcast's claims against Entropic Communications. The grounds centered on anticipation and obviousness using prior art references like Zhang, Reisman, Jackson, and Pandey.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00437
The PTAB denied institution for IPR2024-00437, meaning the challenger's claims against Comcast were not moved forward.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00436
The PTAB denied Comcast's request to institute IPR against Entropic's patent 11381866, citing the existence of a parallel petition. The decision emphasizes the Board's policy favoring single petitions for efficiency.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00434
The PTAB denied Comcast's request to institute IPR against Entropic's wideband tuner patent (9210362) because the petitioner had filed a parallel petition on the same claims.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00432
Comcast Cable Communications successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against Entropic's wideband receiver patent (9210362). The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Comcast could prevail, allowing review of all 20 claims.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00433
The PTAB denied Comcast's petition to challenge patent 9210362, citing the existence of a parallel IPR proceeding that had already been instituted.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00430
Comcast Cable Communications successfully secured institution in its IPR challenge against the '690 patent, arguing that various prior art references anticipate or render obvious claims related to channel assessment probes. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for certain claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, leading to the scheduling of trial.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00431
Comcast Cable Communications successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Entropic Communications regarding broadband network technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing that the patent claims would be obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent instituted
HP Inc. et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00404
The PTAB instituted the IPR, finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for HP Inc. et al. against LiTL LLC's patent claims. The Board adopted Petitioner's claim constructions for key terms like 'frame mode' and 'content mode,' clearing the path to trial.
patent instituted
AT&T Corp. et al. v.Daingean Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00402
The PTAB instituted the IPR against Daingean Technologies Ltd., finding reasonable likelihood of prevailing on claims 1-4. The challenge centers on whether prior art (Lee et al. and Brismar et al.) anticipates or renders obvious the methods for managing System Information Blocks in wireless networks.
patent instituted
Bowmar Archery LLC v.Futtere, Matthew
· IPR2024-00401
Bowmar Archery LLC successfully challenged Matthew Futtere's patent (8043177) in the PTAB, leading to institution on grounds of anticipation and obviousness. The Board adopted key claim constructions while finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for at least claim 11.
patent instituted
Apple, Inc. v.THL Holding Company, LLC
· IPR2024-00400
Apple successfully convinced the PTAB that THL Holding Company's patent claims related to device location and pairing were obvious over a combination of six prior art references. The Board issued an institution decision, setting the stage for a full trial on the challenged claims.
patent denied
Tesla, Inc. v.Relink US LLC
· IPR2024-00389
Tesla's IPR challenge against Relink US LLC was denied by the PTAB, failing to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The Board found that key prior art references (Serban and Somani) did not sufficiently teach or suggest the claimed features related to frequency-based power adjustment in grid-tied photovoltaics.
patent instituted
Tesla, Inc. v.Graphite Charging Company LLC
· IPR2024-00388
Tesla successfully navigated the PTAB's discretionary denial hurdles, leading to the institution of its IPR challenge against Graphite Charging Company LLC. The Board found that Tesla demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of anticipation and obviousness over prior art references like Wang and Cooley.
patent instituted
Ilooda Co., Ltd. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00386
Jeisys Medical Inc.'s IPR challenge against Serendia, LLC's '836 patent was instituted by the PTAB. The Board determined that the Petitioner's grounds of obviousness over prior art like Ganz were plausible and warranted further proceedings. This decision moves the dispute toward a trial phase in the medical device technology space.
patent instituted
SCOUT ENERGY MANAGEMENT, LLC et al. v.Pilot Intellectual Property, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00385
SCOUT ENERGY MANAGEMENT successfully convinced the PTAB to institute an IPR against Pilot Intellectual Property, LLC regarding claims related to natural gas liquid recovery and CO2 reinjection. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over Aycaguer in view of Soldati for several key claims.
patent instituted
Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00384
The PTAB instituted the IPR challenge against Serendia's '536 patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability. The Board determined that prior art (Mehta) discloses the claimed depth control feature despite arguments for fixed-length needles.
patent instituted
Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00383
The PTAB instituted an IPR challenging claims 13 and 14 of Serendia's patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of anticipation by the prior art reference Mehta. The case moves to trial phase after rejecting arguments for discretionary denial based on competitor relationships.
patent instituted
Datavant, Inc. et al. v.Vigilytics LLC
· IPR2024-00382
Datavant successfully challenged the validity of Vigilytics' patent 9665685 in an IPR proceeding. The PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of success on all grounds, instituting the case for further review.
patent instituted
Datavant, Inc. et al. v.Vigilytics LLC
· IPR2024-00381
Datavant, Inc. successfully challenged 20 claims of Vigilytics LLC's patent (10886012) in an IPR proceeding, arguing that the technology for de-identifying medical data was obvious over prior art references like Evenhaim and Murphy. The PTAB decided to institute the case, finding a reasonable likelihood Petitioner would prevail on at least one claim.
patent instituted
JIANGSU FAVORED NANOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. v.P2i Ltd.
· IPR2024-00380
JIANGSU FAVORED NANOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. successfully petitioned to overturn a discretionary denial of IPR for P2i Ltd.'s patent (11041087). The Board found that the prior art was sufficiently evaluated during prosecution, leading to the institution of the case on § 103 grounds.
patent instituted
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00378
The PTAB issued an Institution Decision for IPR2024-00378, finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The petitioner challenged claims 1-15 of the '930 patent related to trading platforms and currency conversion.
patent instituted
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00377
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Intercurrency Software LLC's patent 10062107, challenging claims 19-36 based on obviousness (103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success for the petitioner regarding at least one challenged claim, advancing the dispute into the trial phase.
patent instituted
Askeladden L.L.C. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-00375
Askeladden L.L.C. successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against Intercurrency Software LLC's '863 patent, challenging all twelve claims based on obviousness (103). The Board found that the Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one claim challenged in the Petition.
