US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 341 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
Dell Technologies Inc. et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00480
The PTAB denied the IPR petition filed by Dell Technologies Inc., finding that the challenged claims were not obvious over prior art references like Lane and Fujinawa. The Board determined the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on any ground, upholding the patent's validity.
patent denied
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00479
The PTAB denied Motorola Solutions' IPR against STA Group, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness challenges over prior art Choksi.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00477
The PTAB granted institution in this IPR petition filed by Valve Corporation against Immersion Corporation, covering claims related to Haptic Feedback/Tactile Sensing. The Board found that the prior art references (Komata, Tsuji, Rosenberg) sufficiently disclosed or suggested the challenged limitations under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. This decision moves the case toward trial, affirming the Petitioner's reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00478
Valve Corporation successfully secured institution at the PTAB regarding claims of Immersion Corporation's vibrotactile feedback patent (9430042). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing based on anticipation and obviousness grounds. This decision moves the dispute toward trial in district court.
patent instituted
Arm Ltd. v.ICPillar LLC
· IPR2024-00476
Arm Ltd.'s IPR challenge against ICPillar LLC's '8924899 patent was instituted by the PTAB, focusing on obviousness over prior art including Rompaey and Banerjee. The Board adopted a broad claim construction for key software commands, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
patent instituted
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories S.A. et al. v.Eye Therapies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00467
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories successfully secured institution status for an IPR against Eye Therapies, LLC regarding ophthalmic formulations. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) based on the combination of prior art references.
patent instituted
Ilooda Co., Ltd. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00463
The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for several claims in the dermatological treatment patent, primarily based on anticipation by reference Mehta. The Board rejected arguments for discretionary denial and proceeded with the IPR.
patent denied
DISH Network L.L.C. et al. v.Entropic Communications, LLC
· IPR2024-00462
DISH Network LLC's IPR petition against Entropic Communications, LLC was denied by the PTAB. The Board found insufficient evidence to support the petitioner's argument that combining prior art systems would render the patent obvious.
patent instituted
lululemon usa inc. et al. v.Nike, Inc.
· IPR2024-00460
lululemon successfully petitioned to challenge Nike's patent (8266749) before the PTAB. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success regarding anticipation and obviousness grounds, leading to institution of the IPR.
patent instituted
Geneoscopy, Inc. v.Exact Sciences Corporation
· IPR2024-00459
Geneoscopy, Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Exact Sciences Corporation's patent (11634781). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all grounds, specifically regarding obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent denied
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00458
Microsoft and others failed in their IPR challenge against LiTL LLC's GUI patent (10564818). The PTAB denied the petition, finding that the claimed view-selection method was not obvious over prior art references.
patent denied
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00457
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR, finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success in proving unpatentability. The claims related to graphical user interfaces (GUI) were challenged under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
patent denied
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00455
The PTAB denied the petition challenging patent 9003315, finding that petitioners failed to demonstrate obviousness against the claims. The Board sided with the Patent Owner (LiTL LLC), concluding that prior art combinations did not teach the specific content filtering required by the patent.
patent denied
MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00454
Microsoft and others failed to prove obviousness against LiTL LLC's display adaptation patent (9003315) before the PTAB. The Board found that Petitioners could not demonstrate sufficient particularity regarding content filtering, denying the unpatentability challenges.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00446
Comcast Cable Communications successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Entropic Communications, LLC regarding claims in patent 8223775. The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness over various prior art combinations, including Rabenko and Kim, particularly concerning modular hardware upgrades.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00452
The PTAB denied Comcast Cable Communications' IPR challenge against Entropic Communications' patent covering BCN modulation/bit-loading. The Board found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, specifically rejecting the combination of prior art references as obvious.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00445
Comcast Cable Communications lost its IPR challenge against Entropic Communications, LLC regarding claims related to cable network service group management. The PTAB denied the petition, finding insufficient evidence that the claimed features were obvious in light of prior art references.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00444
The PTAB denied institution for Comcast's IPR against Entropic, finding insufficient evidence that prior art references (Saey and Gross) disclosed or suggested the claimed composite SNR-related metric. This decision reinforces the burden on petitioners to demonstrate specific support for key limitations in complex technical claims.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00441
The PTAB institution decision found that the Petitioner successfully demonstrated unpatentability of numerous claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board relied heavily on combinations of prior art references, notably Kamieniecki and Konstantinos, to support its findings against the patent owner. This outcome significantly strengthens the petitioner's position in the ongoing litigation.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00442
Comcast Cable Communications successfully argued that multiple claims in the patent were obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103, leading to an institution decision by the PTAB. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the assertions of obviousness across various combinations of prior art references.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00440
Comcast's attempt to challenge Entropic's wideband receiver patent in a third parallel IPR was denied by the PTAB, citing procedural guidance against redundant petitions.
patent instituted
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00438
Comcast Cable Communications successfully secured institution at the PTAB for its IPR against Entropic Communications, challenging 76 claims. The Board declined to use discretionary denial despite the petitioner's filing of multiple parallel proceedings.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00439
Comcast's attempt to challenge Entropic's wideband receiver patent was denied by the PTAB due to a previously instituted parallel proceeding.
patent denied
Comcast Corporation et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00437
The PTAB denied Comcast's request to institute an IPR against Entropic's patent, citing the existence of a parallel petition. The Board determined that one petition was sufficient and denying the second would prevent unnecessary burden.
