US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 339 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Microsoft Corporation et al. v.InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00538
Microsoft Corporation successfully challenged InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.'s patent claims in a PTAB decision. The Board found that the petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all asserted grounds regarding anticipation and obviousness. This institution decision keeps the dispute alive for further review.
patent instituted
Microsoft Corporation et al. v.InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00537
The PTAB instituted an IPR challenge against InterDigital's patent 8737933, finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for Microsoft. The Board rejected the Patent Owner's attempt to secure discretionary denial, moving the case to the merits phase.
patent denied
NJOY, LLC et al. v.JUUL Labs, Inc.
· IPR2024-00536
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR petition for NJOY against JUUL Labs, finding that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds. The Board found insufficient motivation or reasonable expectation of success in combining various prior art references across multiple claims.
patent instituted
Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al. v.Sung, Chien-Min
· IPR2024-00535
The PTAB granted institution for all 21 claims in this IPR, finding sufficient evidence of record that prior art (Tsai, Sung '026, Sung '146) anticipates or renders obvious the claimed technology. The decision was reached despite concerns regarding parallel district court litigation involving Samsung and other entities.
patent instituted
Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al. v.Sung, Chien-Min
· IPR2024-00534
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR against Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al., despite arguments from the patent owner that the disclosures were too general or lacked specific enablement. The Board found sufficient evidence to support anticipation and obviousness claims based on prior art Sung ’026.
patent instituted
Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al. v.Sung, Chien-Min
· IPR2024-00533
The PTAB has instituted an IPR challenge against Samsung's 8974270, finding a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness grounds. The Board accepted Petitioner's arguments that combining prior art references renders multiple claims unpatentable.
patent denied
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.LiTL LLC
· IPR2024-00532
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. failed to convince the PTAB that a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA) would be motivated to modify Lane's hinge mechanism using Misawa's single-pivot design. The Board denied institution, finding that the proposed modification would destroy the intended functionality of the original invention.
patent instituted
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Sitnet, LLC
· IPR2024-00531
Meta Platforms successfully petitioned the PTAB to challenge Sitnet's patent (11470682) on grounds of obviousness over multiple prior art references. The Board granted institution, allowing Meta to proceed with its IPR challenge against claims 1-20.
patent instituted
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Sitnet, LLC
· IPR2024-00530
Meta Platforms, Inc. successfully secured institution of its Inter Partes Review against Sitnet's patent 9877345. The Board found that the petitioner met the likelihood standard for obviousness over multiple prior art references (Gage, Mitchell, Shida).
patent instituted
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Sitnet, LLC
· IPR2024-00529
Meta Platforms successfully secured institution in its IPR challenge against Sitnet, LLC's '454 patent. The Board found sufficient support for obviousness over Amidon and Wong/Gogic, advancing the dispute to trial.
patent instituted
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Sitnet, LLC
· IPR2024-00528
Meta Platforms successfully navigated the institution phase of an IPR against Sitnet's patent 8249932, with the PTAB finding a reasonable likelihood that claims are unpatentable. The Board adopted a specific construction for 'situational network,' setting the stage for trial.
patent instituted
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. v.10x Genomics, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00526
Bruker Spatial Biology successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against 10x Genomics, Inc., challenging numerous claims of patent 11542554. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the challenged claims are unpatentable based on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103).
patent denied
Next Step Group, Inc. v.Deckers Outdoor Corporation
· IPR2024-00525
The PTAB denied institution for Next Step Group's IPR against Deckers Outdoor Corporation regarding the Pull Tab Functional '161 patent. The Board found Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood that the claimed ornamental design was anticipated or obvious over the asserted prior art.
patent instituted
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
· IPR2024-00521
Dexcom successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s glucose monitoring patent (11298056). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (103) for claims 13 and 29.
patent denied
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
· IPR2024-00520
Dexcom failed to convince the PTAB that Abbott's glucose monitoring patent was unpatentable based on obviousness grounds. The Board denied institution, finding insufficient evidence across multiple prior art combinations.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00519
The PTAB denied institution for Aylo Freesites Ltd's IPR challenge against DISH Technologies L.L.C.'s patent, citing failures under the General Plastic factors. The Board found that the petitioner lacked sufficient diligence in prior art searching and failed to adequately justify petition timing.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00518
The PTAB denied the IPR petition filed by Aylo Freesites Ltd against DISH Technologies L.L.C., citing a failure to demonstrate reasonable diligence in its prior art search and unfavorable General Plastic factors. The Board found that the Petitioner could not have reasonably avoided finding highly relevant references, leading to the denial of institution for all 16 claims at issue.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00517
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR petition filed by Aylo Freesites Ltd against DISH Technologies L.L.C., citing failure to demonstrate reasonable diligence in prior art search and tactical delays. The Board relied on General Plastic factors, finding the overlap between petitions was significant and Petitioner failed to justify its timing or discovery efforts regarding new references.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00516
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR petition against DISH Technologies L.L.C., finding that Aylo Freesites Ltd failed to demonstrate reasonable diligence in its prior art search. The Board relied on General Plastic factors, noting substantial similarities between the cited references and suggesting a skilled searcher would have found them earlier.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00515
The PTAB denied institution for Aylo Freesites Ltd et al.'s IPR against DISH Technologies L.L.C., citing failure to meet diligence requirements. The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate reasonable diligence in searching for primary prior art, leading to a discretionary denial under General Plastic factors.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00514
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR petition filed by Aylo Freesites Ltd et al., citing a lack of diligence in prior art searching and procedural issues. The Board found that Petitioner failed to substantiate its search efforts, compounded by the existence of similar references cited during prosecution.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00513
The PTAB denied institution for Aylo Freesites Ltd's IPR petition against DISH Technologies L.L.C., citing a lack of reasonable diligence in the prior art search. The Board found that Petitioner failed to justify significant gaps in filing and knowledge regarding relevant references.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00512
The PTAB denied institution for Aylo Freesites Ltd's IPR challenge against DISH Technologies L.L.C.'s patent (11470138). The denial was based on the Petitioner failing to demonstrate reasonable diligence in its prior art search and other General Plastic factors weighing against institution.
patent denied
AT&T Mobility LLC et al. v.Daingean Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00510
AT&T Mobility LLC failed to secure institution in an IPR against Daingean Technologies regarding 5G cellular communications claims. The Board denied the petition because AT&T could not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability, particularly concerning specific claim constructions related to RNTI and information types.
