US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 338 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
Cox Communications, Inc. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00578
Cox Communications' IPR challenge against Entropic Communications regarding network monitoring technology was denied by the PTAB. The Board found insufficient evidence to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness over various prior art references.
patent denied
Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00570
Sony Interactive Entertainment and Sony Group Corporation lost their IPR challenge against Resonant Systems, Inc., regarding vibration module technology. The PTAB denied the petition because the prior art did not teach the necessary algorithmic structure for the claimed control component.
patent instituted
Microsoft Corporation v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-00573
Microsoft Corporation successfully petitioned for IPR against Proxense, LLC's patent (8646042) based on obviousness grounds. The Board granted institution after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple combinations of prior art references.
patent denied
Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00569
The PTAB denied institution for IPR2024-00569, finding that Sony Interactive Entertainment failed to show a reasonable likelihood of success on its challenged claims regarding vibration modules and actuators. The Board sided with the Patent Owner (Resonant Systems) by upholding the requirement for an algorithmic step in the 'control component' structure.
patent denied
Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00568
Sony Interactive Entertainment's IPR challenge against Resonant Systems was denied by the PTAB, finding that Sony failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on any challenged claim. The Board adopted the Patent Owner's view regarding the 'control component,' requiring an algorithmic structure for obviousness.
patent denied
NJOY, Inc. v.JUUL Labs, Inc.
· IPR2024-00567
The PTAB denied NJOY's request to challenge JUUL's electronic cigarette patent (RE49114), finding that the Petitioner failed to meet the burden of showing a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any claim.
patent instituted
Juniper Networks, Inc v.Monarch Networking Solutions LLC
· IPR2024-00565
Juniper Networks successfully petitioned to challenge Monarch Networking Solutions' patent on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success, leading to the institution of the IPR proceedings against claims 1 and 5-8.
patent instituted
Arm Limited v.ICPillar LLC
· IPR2024-00566
Arm Limited successfully secured institution for its IPR challenge against ICPillar LLC's patent 9367657, challenging claims based on obviousness over Banerjee and Rompaey/CoWare. The Board granted institution after the Petitioner mitigated concerns regarding parallel litigation in District Court.
patent instituted
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories S.A. et al. v.Eye Therapies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00563
The PTAB instituted the IPR petition challenging key claims of a patent related to vasoconstriction agents for eye redness. The Board found that Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, despite arguments from the Patent Owner regarding prior art limitations and adverse events.
patent denied
DISH Network L.L.C. et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00562
DISH Network L.L.C.'s attempt to invalidate 40 claims of Entropic Communications' patent (8363681) was denied by the PTAB. The Board found insufficient evidence that the claimed clock synchronization methods were obvious over prior art, including IEEE802.3ah and Shvodian.
patent instituted
Juniper Networks, Inc. v.Monarch Networking Solutions LLC
· IPR2024-00561
Juniper Networks successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Monarch Networking Solutions LLC regarding packet switching claims (Claims 1 and 6). The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness over combinations of prior art references, including Wainner/Bocci and Kamite/Bocci.
patent denied
DISH Network L.L.C. et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00560
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for DISH Network against Entropic Communications, finding that the challenger failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness. The challenge related to common bit-loading methods in broadband coaxial networks.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Staton Techiya LLC
· IPR2024-00559
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Samsung against Staton Techiya regarding U.S. Patent 11,610,587, focusing on audio management and sonic signature detection.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00557
Valve Corporation successfully convinced the PTAB to institute an IPR, challenging Immersion Corporation's patent claims related to haptic feedback systems. The Board found preliminary evidence suggesting that prior art references (Banerjee, Meglan, Rogers) anticipate or render obvious key elements of the asserted claims.
patent denied
Microchip Technology, Inc. v.Aptiv Technologies AG et al.
· IPR2024-00558
The PTAB denied Microchip Technology's IPR against Aptiv Technologies, finding that the Petitioner failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing due to contingent and unsupported claim construction arguments.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00556
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Valve Corporation against Immersion Corporation regarding patent 8,749,507. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that claims are obvious in view of Astala and Shahoian, and Keely/Kolmykov-Zotov.
patent denied
DISH Network L.L.C. et al. v.Entropic Communications LLC
· IPR2024-00555
DISH Network L.L.C.'s IPR petition against Entropic Communications LLC's '566 patent was denied by the PTAB, finding no reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any claim. The Board rejected all asserted grounds under 35 U.S.C. § 103 regarding obviousness over various prior art combinations in OFDMA/Spectrum Sharing technology.
patent denied
3Shape A/S et al. v.Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation
· IPR2024-00549
The PTAB denied the institution of an IPR challenge against Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation's patent covering intra-oral scanning and 3D modeling. The Board found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the grounds of obviousness over combinations of Zhang and Babayoff.
patent denied
3Shape A/S et al. v.Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation
· IPR2024-00548
The PTAB denied the institution of an IPR challenging U.S. Patent 10,076,391 B2. The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on claims related to bite registration methods.
patent denied
DISH Network L.L.C. et al. v.Entropic Communications, LLC
· IPR2024-00546
The PTAB denied the institution of IPR for DISH Network against Entropic Communications, finding that the Petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any ground. The dispute centers on whether specific probe packet techniques in coaxial networks are obvious.
patent instituted
TESLA, INC. v.iQar Inc.
· IPR2024-00545
Tesla successfully petitioned to institute IPR against iQar Inc.'s patent covering automotive systems and power management. The PTAB preliminarily found that the challenged claims were obvious over prior art, specifically Neiss's Predictive Cruise Control system. This decision advances Tesla's challenge in a related District Court case.
patent instituted
TESLA, INC. v.iQar Inc.
· IPR2024-00543
Tesla successfully instituted an IPR against iQar Inc.'s patent covering power management/cruise control systems, asserting obviousness over all challenged claims (1-20). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the grounds that combining prior art references like Hongo and Obradovich renders the claimed technology obvious.
patent denied
TESLA, INC. v.iQar Inc.
· IPR2024-00541
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR challenging Tesla's patent 7,925,426 against iQar Inc., finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claim.
patent denied
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. et al. v.InfoExpress Inc.
· IPR2024-00540
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for Cisco and Fortinet against InfoExpress, finding no reasonable likelihood that the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,347,350 would be found obvious over prior art.
