US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 334 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00735
The PTAB institution decision granted IPR for Samsung against Maxell regarding video management systems. The Board found sufficient evidence that the challenged claims were obvious over various combinations of prior art references, including Horn and Baumgartner. This moves the case into substantive examination on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-00734
Cisco Systems, Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to challenge Lionra Technologies Limited's patent (7623518) on grounds of obviousness and anticipation. The Board found reasonable likelihood of success for Cisco regarding several claims related to dynamic access control lists and network security.
patent instituted
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00733
Dyson successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against a patent covering cleaning apparatuses. The Board found reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102) and obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103).
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Poniatowski, Paul et al.
· IPR2024-00731
Apple Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB that its claims against Paul Poniatowski's patent were likely obvious over prior art references (Wang, Dua, Yong). The Board granted institution of IPR proceedings, moving the dispute toward trial in the District Court.
patent denied
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Pictometry International Corp. et al.
· IPR2024-00729
The PTAB denied Nearmap US, Inc.'s IPR petition against Pictometry International Corp., finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success. The Board also noted that the Petition lacked particularity in mapping prior art disclosures to claim limitations.
patent denied
AT&T Corp et al. v.Daingean Technologies Ltd.
· IPR2024-00730
The PTAB denied AT&T's IPR against Daingean Technologies, finding that the Petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of success regarding claims related to code block segmentation and HARQ-ACKs. The denial hinged on insufficient support for the 'multiple CB/CBG limitation' in both cited prior art references.
patent instituted
Intel Corporation et al. v.TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON et al.
· IPR2024-00728
Intel Corporation et al. successfully challenged patent claims related to inductor design and RF transceivers in an IPR proceeding against Ericsson et al. The PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds, including obviousness based on the Taniguchi prior art.
patent denied
Ovid Therapeutics Inc. v.Marinus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
· IPR2024-00726
Ovid Therapeutics Inc.'s IPR challenge against Marinus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was denied by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing in its challenges regarding plasma concentration limitations and priority.
patent denied
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al. v.Nokia Technology Oy
· IPR2024-00725
Amazon's attempt to invalidate Nokia's video compression patent (8204134) failed at the PTAB. The Board denied institution, finding that Amazon could not prove obviousness over prior art like Yagasaki.
patent instituted
VIZIO, Inc. v.Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-00723
VIZIO, Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.'s patent (9578384) covering Video On Demand user interfaces. The Board granted institution based on sufficient evidence of obviousness over multiple prior art references.
patent denied
VIZIO, Inc. v.Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-00722
The PTAB denied VIZIO's request to challenge Multimedia Technologies' patent (9,232,168) because a key claim term ('a different user interface device') was found to be indefinite. The Board ruled it could not assess obviousness without clear claim scope.
patent denied
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-00721
The PTAB denied MediaTek's IPR against MOSAID, finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability over prior art references related to integrated circuit power management.
patent denied
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-00720
The PTAB denied MediaTek's IPR against MOSAID's patent 8253438. The Board found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of showing obviousness over prior art references like Takahashi and Mizuno, particularly regarding the 'plurality of power islands' limitation.
patent instituted
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.:
· IPR2024-00719
MediaTek Inc. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against MOSAID Technologies Inc.'s patent, challenging all 64 claims based on obviousness (103). The Board found that MediaTek demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing by combining prior art references Nowka and Borkar in the field of integrated circuit power management.
patent denied
MediaTek Inc. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.:
· IPR2024-00718
The PTAB denied MediaTek's IPR challenge against MOSAID regarding power management technology. Despite a dissenting judge arguing for reasonable likelihood based on Nowka and Borkar, the Board found Petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient motivation or intrinsic support for its obviousness theories.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00717
The PTAB instituted IPR against Maxell, Ltd.'s patent claims related to camera control systems. The Board declined discretionary denial despite parallel district court litigation because the petitioner agreed not to assert the same grounds there.
patent denied
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00715
Vicor Corporation's IPR petition against Delta Electronics was denied by the PTAB, finding no reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of anticipation or obviousness. The Board cited insufficient support for combining prior art references and noted that the petitioner employed impermissible hindsight.
patent denied
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Eagle View Technologies, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00716
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for Nearmap US against Eagle View Technologies regarding a property database patent (10671648). The denial was based on the Petitioner's failure to provide a detailed, non-bare-quotation explanation linking prior art disclosures to the challenged claims.
patent instituted
Salvacion USA, Inc. et al. v.Trutek Corp.
· IPR2024-00711
Salvacion USA successfully achieved institution in the IPR against Trutek Corp.'s nasal application formulations, facing challenges of anticipation and obviousness over prior art including Chen. The Board found Petitioner's arguments persuasive on the record after detailed claim construction, setting the stage for a full trial.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00714
Valve Corporation successfully secured institution in the IPR against Immersion Corporation's haptics patent (10627907). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success based on prior art references, particularly Goldenberg.
patent instituted
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-00710
The PTAB instituted an IPR challenge against WellcomeMat, LLC's patent (8307286) concerning online video/real estate marketing. The Board found that the Petitioner met the reasonable likelihood standard despite prior district court litigation.
patent instituted
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless LLC
· IPR2024-00707
The PTAB institution decision upheld the Petitioner's challenge of nine claims based on obviousness in wireless communication technology. The Board accepted that prior art disclosures, including IEEE standards and Shearer, support the claimed dual-frequency transmission structure.
patent instituted
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00705
The PTAB institution decision for IPR2024-00705 found reasonable likelihood of success on claims 1-6, despite disputes over claim construction. The Petitioner argued that the combination of prior art references anticipated or rendered the patent obvious in the field of Power Converters/Circuit Boards.
patent denied
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00706
The PTAB denied institution of Vicor Corporation's IPR against Delta Electronics, Inc., finding Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The denial hinged on the argument that Petitioner relied on impermissible hindsight bias when combining prior art references for obviousness and anticipation grounds.
