US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 333 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
New Balance Athletics, Inc. v.Nike, Inc.
· IPR2024-00778
New Balance Athletics' IPR challenge against Nike's footwear patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board rejected arguments of anticipation and obviousness, particularly regarding claim scope limitations like 'article of footwear.'
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00777
Samsung Electronics successfully secured institution at the PTAB for its IPR against Maxell's patent 11017815. The Board found that Samsung presented a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple claims, overcoming prior art challenges based on combinations of references like Horn and Baumgartner.
patent instituted
Microsoft Corporation v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-00775
Microsoft Corporation successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Proxense, LLC regarding biometric authentication claims. The Board found reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple claims based on obviousness over Burger and Robinson.
patent
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.Greenthread, LLC
· IPR2024-00772
The Director granted review in multiple IPRs involving Texas Instruments and Greenthread, vacating the FWDs. The cases are remanded to allow discovery on privity issues across related proceedings.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00770
TikTok Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against Cellspin Soft, Inc.'s patent covering Bluetooth data transfer and content publishing. The Board found sufficient evidence that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art references.
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00770
The Director vacated institution decisions in the TikTok vs. Cellspin IPRs, denying petitions because TikTok failed to prove it was not controlled by a foreign government at the time of filing.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00769
TikTok and its affiliates successfully petitioned for institution in an IPR against Cellspin Soft regarding wireless communication patents. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on obviousness over multiple prior art references, including Singh129/Singh906 and Kahn/Bluetooth.
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00769
The Director vacated institution decisions in the TikTok v. Cellspin IPRs, denying them because TikTok failed to prove it was not controlled by a foreign government at the time of filing.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00768
TikTok Inc. successfully navigated the institution phase of an IPR against Cellspin Soft, Inc., leading to a decision that reasonable likelihood of unpatentability was established for claims 1-10 over Singh129 and Singh906. The Board found that Petitioner adequately demonstrated material error in prior art consideration during prosecution regarding Ground 2.
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00768
The Director vacated institution decisions in the TikTok vs. Cellspin IPRs, denying them because TikTok failed to prove it was not controlled by a foreign government at the time of filing.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00767
TikTok Inc.'s challenge to Cellspin Soft's patent was instituted by the PTAB, finding a reasonable likelihood that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable. The Board focused on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103) over prior art references including Hiroishi, Kahn, and Bluetooth specifications. This decision sets up trial proceedings to determine if the combination of existing technologies renders the patent claims invalid.
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00767
The Director denied TikTok's IPR petitions against Cellspin Soft, citing precedent that bars foreign governments from participating in AIA proceedings. The decision vacated prior institution orders and terminated the review.
patent denied
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00766
The PTAB denied Dyson's IPR challenge against Omachron's vacuum cleaner patent (10,568,477). The Board found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success, rejecting arguments based on prior art references like Brown and Dimbylow.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00752
Google LLC successfully secured the institution of its IPR against Dialect LLC's patent, challenging claims related to Natural Language Processing and Conversational AI. The Board found that prior art disclosure regarding context stack synchronization was sufficient to warrant further review under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00753
Google LLC successfully secured institution of its IPR challenge against Dialect LLC's patent, arguing that Claim 12 is obvious over a combination of prior art references. The Board found sufficient motivation to combine the teachings of Kennewick and Ross for trial on merits.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00751
Google LLC's IPR challenge against Dialect LLC's patent was denied by the PTAB, finding insufficient evidence of obviousness over prior art (Coffman, Kennewick, Ross). The Board agreed with the Patent Owner that the prior art disclosures were too high-level to support the combination claimed.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00750
Google LLC successfully initiated an IPR challenge against Dialect LLC's patent (9031845) covering natural language speech processing in vehicles. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, focusing on obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 using prior art references like Coffman, Julia, and Cooper.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00749
The PTAB denied Google LLC's IPR against Dialect LLC, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its grounds of obviousness related to natural language speech processing in vehicles.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00747
Google LLC's IPR challenge against Dialect LLC's patent on conversational AI was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Google failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over prior art references like Coffman, Kanevsky, and Ronning.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00748
The PTAB denied Google LLC's request to institute IPR against Dialect LLC's speech-interface patent (8015006). The Board found that Google failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
TESLA, INC. v.Autonomous Devices, LLC
· IPR2024-00745
Tesla successfully argued that the patent claims are obvious over combinations of prior art, leading to the Board's decision to institute IPR trial. The petitioner focused on combining spiking neural network techniques with autonomous robotic operation for improved efficiency and task specialization. This institution sets up a high-stakes technical battle regarding AI implementation in robotics.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00746
Google LLC's attempt to invalidate Dialect LLC's speech recognition patent via IPR was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Google failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on its unpatentability grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. This decision maintains the validity of the '7398209 patent in the context of ongoing district court litigation.
patent instituted
Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution, LLC v.Digital Media Technology Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-00736
Disney Media & Entertainment Distribution successfully secured the institution of its IPR against Digital Media Technology Holdings regarding patent 7574725. The Board adopted broad claim constructions for key terms like 'distributing' and 'exhibiting,' favoring the Petitioner’s interpretation over the Patent Owner’s narrow industry definitions. This sets a favorable precedent for interpreting media technology claims broadly in PTAB proceedings.
patent denied
CUB Elecparts Inc. v.Orange Electronic Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00744
The PTAB denied institution of the IPR, finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its grounds of obviousness (103). The challenge targeted multiple claims related to Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems using various prior art combinations.
