US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 325 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v.GoPro, Inc.
· IPR2024-01052
The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for the petitioner, Arashi Vision Inc., against GoPro, Inc. on multiple grounds under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board agreed with the Petitioner's interpretation of key claim terms related to video processing and stabilization technology.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01051
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Headwater Research LLC's patent (8639811) regarding wireless device provisioning and access control. The Board found reasonable likelihood that dependent claim 4 would be obvious over the combination of prior art references Rao and Jones.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01050
The PTAB denied Apple's IPR petition against S.M.R Innovations, finding no reasonable likelihood that the 'apparatus for rerouting data' patent would be invalidated based on prior art references like Chihara and BluetoothSpec.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple Inc.'s IPR challenge against S.M.R Innovations LTD et al. was instituted by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (§ 103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing regarding several claims, focusing on how prior art combines to teach all limitations of the asserted claims in data routing and multimedia transmission technology.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01049
The PTAB denied Apple's IPR challenge against Patent 8,711,866 B2, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on its grounds of obviousness.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01047
Apple Inc.'s IPR challenge against S.M.R Innovations LTD was denied by the PTAB, finding that Petitioner failed to meet the standard for institution on obviousness grounds (103). The Board specifically found that prior art references did not teach scanning for pre-identified compatible devices as required by the claims.
patent instituted
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01046
Sony Corporation successfully secured institution for its IPR challenge against Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC's '266 patent. The Board found that Sony demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of showing unpatentability, allowing the case to proceed to trial on all 22 challenged claims.
patent denied
VusionGroup SA et al. v.Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-01045
VusionGroup SA's IPR petition challenging Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found insufficient evidence that the claimed technology, related to retail/warehouse automation and inventory management, was obvious over the cited prior art references.
patent instituted
NPX USA, Inc. et al. v.Bell Northern Research, LLC
· IPR2024-01044
NPX USA successfully petitioned to have Bell Northern Research's wireless communication patents instituted for obviousness under § 103. The Board found that the combination of prior art references, including Jones and 802.11a, renders multiple claims unpatentable. This institution decision sets a strong precedent regarding OFDM technology in wireless communications.
patent instituted
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01043
Amazon successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Nokia regarding mobile device user interface claims related to locked-state application interaction. The Board found reasonable likelihood of success on multiple grounds, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
patent instituted
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01041
The PTAB instituted an IPR challenge against a wireless communications patent covering network service plan provisioning. The Petitioner, Cellco/Verizon Wireless et al., successfully demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its grounds of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. This sets the stage for a full trial proceeding on all 42 challenged claims.
patent instituted
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01042
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. successfully challenged Headwater Research LLC's patent (8924543) on grounds of obviousness, leading to the institution of the IPR proceeding. The petitioner argued that combining prior art references Poh and Maes rendered the claimed network service provisioning system obvious.
patent instituted
Canadian Solar Inc. et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01040
Canadian Solar successfully convinced the PTAB to institute its IPR against Maxeon Solar, challenging claims related to solar cell fabrication. The Board found that Canadian Solar demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple obviousness grounds over various prior art combinations. This sets up a high-stakes trial in advanced photovoltaic technology.
patent instituted
Canadian Solar Inc et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01039
Canadian Solar Inc.'s IPR petition against Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd. was instituted by the PTAB, finding a reasonable likelihood of success on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board determined that Petitioner presented sufficient evidence to support its arguments regarding prior art combinations in solar cell technology.
patent instituted
Canadian Solar Inc. et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01038
Canadian Solar successfully instituted its IPR against Maxeon Solar regarding solar cell fabrication technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness for several claims over various combinations of prior art, authorizing trial on multiple claims.
patent instituted
Luxottica of America Inc., et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01030
Luxottica successfully petitioned to institute IPR against E-Vision Optics regarding eyewear technology, overcoming initial procedural hurdles. The Board found that Petitioner adequately established a reasonable likelihood of proving anticipation for key claims based on prior art references.
patent instituted
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01026
Roku successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against VideoLabs regarding claims related to conditional access and DRM technology. The Board found sufficient evidence of anticipation (102) and obviousness (103) over prior art 'Russ' and 'Robert.'
patent instituted
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01025
Roku successfully petitioned for the institution of IPR against VideoLabs regarding claims related to Conditional Access and Digital Rights Management. The Board found that Petitioner's evidence sufficiently supported unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, advancing the dispute into the review phase.
patent instituted
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB that its claims related to conditional access and DRM systems were unpatentable over prior art (Russ). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on both anticipation (§102) and obviousness (§103), leading to institution of the IPR.
patent instituted
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01024
Roku, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute its challenge against VideoLabs' patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (Anticipation). The Board found sufficient support for anticipation over prior art 'Russ,' while denying institution on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
Inari Agriculture successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Corteva Agriscience's GMO patents based on prior art from Barbour. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing regarding anticipation and obviousness over the cited publication, moving the case toward trial.
patent instituted
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01013
LG Energy Solution successfully secured the institution of its IPR against Molecular Rebar Design, LLC regarding lithium-ion battery technology. The Board found that Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on key claims despite arguments of obviousness over multiple prior art references.
patent instituted
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01012
LG Energy Solution successfully convinced the PTAB that its obviousness challenges against Molecular Rebar Design's battery patent were strong enough for institution. The Board found sufficient evidence across multiple prior art combinations, leading to the IPR being instituted on all 16 claims.
patent instituted
LG Energy Solution, Ltd. v.Molecular Rebar Design, LLC
· IPR2024-01011
LG Energy Solution successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Molecular Rebar Design, LLC's battery patent (8968924). The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness over combinations of prior art references like Ohata and Kavan. This decision allows the challenge to proceed to a full trial phase at the PTAB.
