US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 324 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01091
Apple Inc. successfully secured institution at the PTAB for its challenge against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC's touch screen patent (10936114). The Board found sufficient likelihood of unpatentability based on anticipation and obviousness grounds across multiple claims using four prior art references.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01090
Apple Inc.'s IPR against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC was instituted by the PTAB, confirming that prior art references could teach all limitations of key gesture recognition claims. The Board found sufficient evidence to proceed to trial on 17 claims related to touch screen interaction in mobile devices.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01089
Apple Inc. successfully secured institution of its IPR challenge against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC regarding touch screen interface claims. The Board found that the petitioner demonstrated sufficient motivation to combine prior art references for obviousness challenges under 35 U.S.C. § 103. This paves the way for a full trial on key mobile computing patents.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01088
Apple Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB that numerous claims in Smith Interface Technologies, LLC's patent were obvious over various prior art combinations. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all grounds presented, leading to the institution of the IPR.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01087
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to institute an Inter Partes Review against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC's patent 10656755. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (35 claims challenged).
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01085
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC regarding claims related to graphical user interfaces and touch screen manipulation. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds of obviousness (103).
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01086
Apple Inc.'s attempt to challenge a patent from Smith Interface Technologies, LLC was denied by the PTAB. The Board utilized its discretion to deny institution because this petition was ranked last among seven parallel challenges.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01084
Apple Inc. successfully obtained institution at the PTAB against Smith Interface Technologies, LLC regarding claims related to Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over prior art references Shiplacoff and Nan, leading to an institutional decision.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01083
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Smith Interface Technologies regarding gesture-based touch interfaces. The Board found sufficient evidence that Apple's claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references Ahn, Chaudhri, and Hinckley. This decision sets the stage for a full trial on patent validity.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-01078
The PTAB granted institution for a high-stakes IPR concerning wearable biosensor technology, specifically smart rings. The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness (103) and anticipation (102) to proceed with trial on 17 claims.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-01080
The PTAB denied an IPR petition filed by Samsung against Oura Health because the patent owner had disclaimed all challenged claims.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-01079
The PTAB denied an IPR petition filed by Samsung against Oura Health because the patent owner had disclaimed all challenged claims. This denial was based on procedural rules regarding pre-institution claim disclaimer.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-01077
Samsung Electronics successfully pushed through the institution phase of its IPR challenge against Oura Health's '859 Patent. The Board found that the second challenge, based on prior art including Schröder and Mestas, met the threshold for obviousness (103).
patent instituted
Luxottica of America Inc., et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01072
Luxottica of America Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB against E-Vision Optics, LLC regarding wearable electronics claims in IPR2024-01072. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on Jannard for several key claims. This decision moves the case toward trial and confirms the validity of Luxottica's challenge.
patent instituted
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01071
Luxottica successfully petitioned for institution of IPR against E-Vision Optics regarding claims in the '541 patent, overcoming arguments related to parallel litigation and statutory bars. The Board found that the Petitioner provided sufficient mitigation via a Sotera stipulation, allowing the obviousness challenge to proceed.
patent instituted
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01070
Luxottica of America Inc. successfully petitioned for institution against E-Vision Optics, LLC regarding patent 8801174, which covers smart eyeglasses technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that several claims are unpatentable based on anticipation and obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01069
Luxottica of America Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against E-Vision Optics, LLC's patent (10613355). The Board found that Luxottica demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds (§ 103) across all 21 challenged claims.
patent instituted
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01067
The PTAB instituted the IPR for smaXtec Inc. against ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC after finding sufficient evidence of unpatentability in several claims. The Board specifically found that Claim 5 was anticipated by Harvey and determined there was a reasonable likelihood of obviousness for Claim 7 over Harvey and Rettedal.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01058
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenge against Anonymous Media Research Holdings was denied by the PTAB. The Board found Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01057
The PTAB denied Roku's request to institute IPR against the '848 patent, finding that Petitioner failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The denial hinged on the failure of the Petitioner to prove that key prior art (Seet) was entitled to its provisional filing date due to lack of written description support for non-audio media.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01056
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenge against Anonymous Media Research Holdings was denied by the PTAB after failing to meet institution standards on grounds of obviousness and novelty. The Board rejected arguments regarding 'content offset' data and content identification results disclosed in prior art references like Feininger and Ramaswamy.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01055
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenging Anonymous Media Research Holdings' content identification patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness assertions against multiple prior art references.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01054
Roku's IPR against Anonymous Media Research Holdings was denied because the key prior art reference (Seet) lacked written description support for non-audio media, preventing it from qualifying as prior art to the challenged patent.
patent denied
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01053
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenge against Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC was denied by the PTAB, failing to meet the threshold for institution in all challenges. The Board rejected Petitioner's arguments regarding 'content offset,' requiring it to be relative to a reference point within the content.
