US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 294 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Intel Corporation et al. v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00915
The PTAB issued an Institution Decision in the Intel vs. Advanced Cluster Systems IPR, finding a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over combinations of prior art references. This decision targets 30 claims related to cluster computing and parallel processing technologies.
patent instituted
Intel Corporation et al. v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00914
Intel Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices challenged the patentability of Advanced Cluster Systems' cluster computing patents before the PTAB. The Board issued an institution decision, finding sufficient evidence that the claims are obvious over prior art references like Menon and Trefethen. This moves the dispute toward a full trial on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Intel Corporation et al. v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00913
Intel Corporation et al. successfully instituted IPR proceedings against Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc., challenging 30 claims of patent 11570034 based on obviousness (103). The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner could prevail in its challenge to cluster computing technology.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00911
Apple Inc. successfully challenged Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent claims in a PTAB Institution Decision, arguing the wireless communications technology is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board instituted review on all 16 claimed limitations based on combinations of prior art references including Cirik and Wu.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00910
Apple Inc. successfully overcame the Patent Owner's attempt to deny the IPR, leading to the institution of the case against Apex Beam Technologies LLC. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Apple can prove obviousness over combinations of prior art references like Cirik and Wu.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00909
Apple Inc.'s IPR against Apex Beam Technologies LLC's '695 patent covering 5G NR uplink cancellation has been instituted. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success on the obviousness grounds over prior art references Ying and Yang for Claim 1, setting up a trial on all 20 claims.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00908
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to challenge Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent (11,108,639) in the PTAB, leading to institution of the IPR. The Board found sufficient evidence that the claims related to wireless scheduling mechanisms are unpatentable over combinations of Fakoorian-1 and Takahashi. This sets up a major IP battle regarding advanced cellular technology standards.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00907
Apple Inc. successfully demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing in its IPR against Apex Beam Technologies LLC regarding claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11139944. The Board found that the combination of 3GPP standards documents renders the claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103, leading to institution of trial.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00906
Apple Inc. successfully established a reasonable likelihood of prevailing in its IPR against Apex Beam Technologies LLC regarding 5G NR physical layer procedures. The Board found that various 3GPP technical specifications collectively teach the claimed inventions, leading to institution on grounds of obviousness and anticipation.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00905
Apple Inc. successfully secured the institution of Inter Partes Review against Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent, challenging 17 claims based on obviousness over prior art including Yeo and TS36.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00904
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Apple against Apex Beam, challenging 20 claims related to multi-antenna transmission in wireless systems. The Board found that Apple met the reasonable likelihood standard based on prior art references Kim and Chen.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00903
Apple successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Apex Beam Technologies, challenging 20 claims of the '110 patent related to multi-antenna transmission. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Apple would prevail on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00901
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Apple against Apex Beam Technologies over a wireless communication patent. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the combination of Lee, Freda, and Ly renders claims 1-20 obvious.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00900
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent, demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for claims 1-20 based on prior art.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00898
Apple successfully secured the institution of an IPR against Apex Beam Technologies, challenging 20 claims related to massive MIMO transmission. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing based on obviousness over prior art references Kim and Chen.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00897
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent 10,944,527, arguing the claims are obvious over prior art related to massive MIMO and beamforming.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00896
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Apple Inc. against Apex Beam Technologies LLC, finding a reasonable likelihood that the combination of Chen and 3GPP renders at least one claim obvious.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00895
Apple Inc. successfully secured the institution of Inter Partes Review against Apex Beam Technologies LLC's patent 10,568,113, challenging claims based on obviousness over prior art including Xia and Jover.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Apex Beam Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-00894
Apple successfully secured the institution of Inter Partes Review against Apex Beam's patent 10,462,767, challenging all 20 claims based on obviousness over prior art standards like Yeo and TS36.
patent instituted
Clearwater Paper Corporation v.--
· IPR2025-00878
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Clearwater Paper Corporation against Graphic Packaging International LLC, challenging claims related to biodegradable paper cups based on prior art references Cleveland and Nakagawa.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Cellular South Inc
· IPR2025-00877
The PTAB denied Google's request to institute IPR against Cellular South's patent (11,126,853), finding the petitioner failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Datonics LLC
· IPR2025-00873
Amazon initiated an IPR against Datonics LLC's patent (US 10984445) concerning profile-based behavioral targeting. The PTAB decided to institute the proceeding, finding a reasonable likelihood that at least one claim is unpatentable as obvious over prior art combinations.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Sandpiper CDN, LLC
· IPR2025-00860
Google LLC initiated an IPR against Sandpiper CDN, LLC's patent (10924573) covering Content Delivery Networks. The Board instituted the case, finding a reasonable likelihood that Google could prevail under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on obviousness over prior art combinations.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Allani, Ferid
· IPR2025-00857
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Apple against Ferid Allani's patent, focusing on web navigation claims. The Board found reasonable likelihood of unpatentability in several dependent claims but rejected it for the independent claims.
