Bizlink Technology, Inc., et al. v. Ander Power Products, Inc.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al.vsVasu Holdings, LLC

Samsung’s counsel filed a Director rehearing request after the USPTO denied institution of multiple IPRs against Vasu Holdings. The petition seeks to overturn the denial and keep the challenges active.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsOura Health Oy et al.

The Board upheld the validity of Oura Health's smart ring patent against Samsung Electronics in a Final Written Decision. The Panel found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate obviousness over prior art combining physical activity monitoring and wearable input devices.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al.vsMobile Data Technologies LLC

Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging Mobile Data Technologies’ U.S. Patent 8,825,801, asserting that the claims are obvious over two prior‑art combinations (Randall‑Forsyth and Pelkey‑Eck) and urging the Board to institute the review.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al.vsYangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.

Micron Technology failed to invalidate Yangtze Memory Technologies' patent on obviousness grounds in a PTAB IPR decision. The Board found that the petitioner could not demonstrate that combining prior art teachings would render the claimed 3D Flash memory invention obvious.

Microsoft CorporationvsProxense, LLC

Microsoft Corporation successfully convinced the PTAB that its biometric authentication claims were not obvious over prior art, leading to the institution of the IPR. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim, allowing the case to proceed to trial.