US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 234 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent terminated or settled · Aug 27, 2024
EndyMed Medical Ltd. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00845
EndyMed Medical and Serendia reached a settlement that resolved all disputes over U.S. Patent No. 10,869,812. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the instituted IPRs and treated the settlement agreement as confidential business information.
patent · Aug 27, 2024
Phison Electronics Corporation v.Vervain, LLC.
· PGR2024-00047
Phison Electronics Corp. has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of Vervain’s ‘546 NAND flash memory patent. The petition alleges lack of patent‑eligible subject matter, insufficient written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness over extensive prior art.
patent null · Aug 27, 2024
EndyMed Medical Ltd. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00845
EndyMed Medical Ltd. petitions to invalidate Serendia's microneedling patent (10869812) based on anticipation and obviousness over prior art references, including Mehta and Na’848. The petition challenges all 20 claims, arguing that the combination of existing technology renders the claimed invention non-novel or obvious.
patent denied · Aug 27, 2024
Phison Electronics Corporation v.Vervain, LLC.
· PGR2024-00047
The PTAB denied the petition challenging a NAND Flash Memory System patent based on grounds including 101, 112, and 103. The Board found that the claims were directed toward a technological improvement in memory storage and adequately supported by the specification.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
Feit Electric seeks Director Review to vacate the institution of two consolidated IPRs covering its LED lighting patent, citing failure to disclose a Chinese parent company and contradictory claim‑construction arguments by the petitioners.
patent instituted · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
Feit Electric requests Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s denial of its motion to terminate an IPR, arguing that petitioners presented inconsistent claim constructions across forums.
patent denied · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
Feit Electric’s request to extend the Director Review deadline in two IPRs was denied as untimely, despite arguments about a recent policy change and foreign ownership concerns.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01348
Samsung Electronics and Anonymous Media Research Holdings settled their IPR before institution, dismissing the petition and the patent with prejudice.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
Garmin and Saris have filed a joint request to keep their settlement confidential and to terminate the IPR over patent 10,434,394.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 26, 2024
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
Garmin and Saris Equipment jointly moved to end the IPR over patent 10,434,394 after reaching a settlement. The Board granted the motion, terminating the proceeding and sealing the settlement agreement.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies opposes the patent owner's request for director review, arguing the deposition dispute is moot and that the cited references are printed publications supporting the institution of inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies and Cambridge Enterprise Limited jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-01235 after reaching a settlement agreement. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies seeks Director Review of a PTAB institution, arguing the Board erred on the printed‑publication requirement and relied on inadmissible hearsay. The Patent Owner contends the petitioner failed to provide evidence that cited references qualify as printed publications and refused to make a key expert available for deposition.
patent denied · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
The Patent Owner’s request for Director Review of the Board’s denial of its motion to terminate the IPR was rejected as improper under the CFR. The Board cited statutory limits on Director Review authority.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 26, 2024
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
Garmin and Saris Equipment have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 10,434,394 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding.
patent denied · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
The PTAB denied Pascal Technologies' request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2024-01235, leaving the institution order in place.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
Lionra Technologies has filed a Director Review request in IPR2024-01281. Cisco must respond within five business days, limited to 15 pages and without new evidence.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
Cisco Systems submits an authorized response urging the PTAB Director to deny Lionra Technologies’ request for review of the Board’s decision that all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 7,738,471 are unpatentable. Cisco argues the Board correctly applied Axonics precedent and that the prior art teaches the disputed limitation.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Lionra Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01281
Lionra Technologies has filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s finding that Cisco’s high‑speed packet‑processing claims are unpatentable. The patent owner contends the Board erred in accepting a new reply theory and misapplied inherency standards.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Cambridge Enterprise has requested a Director Review of IPR2024-01235. Pascal Technologies may respond within five business days, limited to five pages and without new evidence. The Board will decide whether to grant the review.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 26, 2024
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies and Cambridge Enterprise Limited, along with two universities, settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,230,656. The Board terminated the proceeding and treated the settlement agreement as confidential business information.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01348
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑13 of U.S. Patent 10,572,896, alleging obviousness over Steuer and Neumeier references and lack of written‑description support. The petition argues no discretionary denial factors apply and requests institution of the review.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2024-01357
Savant Technologies (GE Lighting) petitions the PTAB to institute IPR on Feit Electric’s 8,604,678 patent, asserting that its claims on white‑light LED devices with TiO₂ diffusing layers are obvious over several pre‑AIA references.
patent · Aug 26, 2024
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
Garmin has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1, 12, and 25‑26 of Saris’s ’394 bicycle‑trainer patent, asserting that the claims are anticipated by Zwinkels and obvious over Zwinkels alone or combined with Papadopoulos. The petition requests institution of the review and cancellation of the challenged claims.
