US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 221 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01424
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight settled their IPR disputes covering four patents, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings and keep the settlement confidential.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01424
Aputure Imaging Industries and Rotolight have jointly filed a motion to keep their settlement materials confidential under statutory provisions, requesting the Board to separate the documents from the public file.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01424
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight have settled their dispute over a lighting patent and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01423
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight settled their dispute over four patents, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPRs and keep the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01423
Aputure Imaging Industries and Rotolight Limited have jointly filed a motion to terminate IPR2024-01423 after reaching a settlement. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and public policy favors termination when parties settle.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01422
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,845,044 B2 and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01422
Aputure and Rotolight have jointly filed a motion to keep their settlement materials confidential under federal law. The request cites 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) to limit public disclosure.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01425
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight have jointly filed a motion to keep their settlement materials confidential, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and related regulations.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01439
Barco N.V. filed a motion to seal portions of its Request for Director Review in IPR2024-01439, asserting that the material contains highly confidential licensing and financial information. The Board must decide whether the confidentiality interests outweigh the public’s right to a complete record.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v.Croga Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2024-01421
Palo Alto Networks and Croga Innovations settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,223,601, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
· IPR2024-01447
Western Digital’s IPR against a magnetic tunnel junction patent was instituted, but the patent owner seeks Director review to vacate the institution, arguing that piecemeal review of one of nine related patents is inefficient and contrary to AIA policy.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
· IPR2024-01447
Western Digital filed an authorized response opposing IP Bridge’s request for Director Review of the PTAB’s institution of IPR2024-01447. The company contends the request lacks any showing of error or abuse of discretion and should be denied.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
ETN CAPITAL, LLC d/b/a BEECH LANE v.FBA Operating Co.
· IPR2024-01445
ETN Capital and FBA Operating Co. settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,890,925 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board granted the termination, citing its policy of encouraging settlement.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01439
Barco N.V. has requested Director Review of four IPRs involving Yealink’s challenge to U.S. Patent 11,422,951. The petitioner is limited to a 15‑page response filed within five business days, with no new evidence allowed.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01439
Barco seeks reversal of the PTAB’s final written decision on its presentation‑dongle patent, arguing the Board wrongly discounted a multi‑patent license and commercial‑success evidence. The petition requests director review to reinstate the patent’s validity.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01438
Barco has requested Director Review of four IPRs challenging its patent, and the Board has set a tight deadline for Yealink to respond without new evidence.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01437
Barco N.V. moved to seal its Request for Director Review in IPR2024-01437, arguing that the licensing and financial information it submitted is highly confidential. The motion cites Argentum factors and prior PTAB decisions to justify sealing.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01437
Barco has requested Director Review of four IPRs against Yealink. The petitioner must file a concise response within five business days, without new evidence.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01438
Court decision.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Barco N.V.
· IPR2024-01436
Barco seeks reversal of the PTAB's Final Written Decision for U.S. Patent 10,762,002, arguing that the Board undervalued a key licensing agreement with Crestron and commercial‑success evidence. The petition requests Director Review to reinstate the patent's validity.
patent · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01423
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight filed a joint motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement materials confidential under statutory provisions, seeking to separate the documents from the public patent file.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
ETN CAPITAL, LLC d/b/a BEECH LANE v.FBA Operating Co.
· IPR2024-01445
The IPR concerning patent 10,890,925 was terminated after the parties reached a settlement. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and ordered the settlement agreement to be treated as confidential business information.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Aputure Imaging Industries Co., Ltd. v.--
· IPR2024-01422
Aputure Imaging and Rotolight settled their dispute over four USPTO patents, leading the Board to terminate four IPRs before any merits were decided and to keep the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Sep 16, 2024
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v.Croga Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2024-01421
Palo Alto Networks and Croga Innovations filed a joint request to keep their settlement agreement confidential, invoking statutory confidentiality protections and seeking to separate the document from the IPR record.
