US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 176 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Golden Eye Technologies LLC
· IPR2026-00188
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate five claims of Golden Eye's 9,271,243 patent covering WLAN transmit‑power adjustment. The challenger relies on prior‑art references Hills, Wang and Calhoun to argue obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103.
patent
Guardant Health, Inc. v.Tempus AI, Inc.
· IPR2026-00185
Guardant Health filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 18 claims of Tempus AI’s 10,991,097 patent, asserting anticipation by Chukka and obviousness over Chukka combined with Jones, Sebastiao, and Gallas. The petition argues the prior art was not considered during prosecution.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.GOLDEN EYE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
· IPR2026-00187
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑3 and 13‑15 of Golden Eye Technologies' 9,717,037 patent. The challenger argues the claims are obvious over earlier Wi‑Fi standards and patents (Choudhary, Hasty, Chen). The petition requests the Board to institute the review and cancel the challenged claims.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00119
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 17 claims of Network‑1’s ’893 patent covering eUICC provisioning, arguing the claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art references.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00118
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 22 claims of Network‑1’s eUICC provisioning patent, alleging obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition details how a POSITA would combine teachings from Park, GlobalPlatform, AbiChar, X9.63, Weiss and Nix175 to render the claims unpatentable.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00118
Samsung has filed an IPR petition to invalidate all 22 claims of Network‑1’s eUICC provisioning patent (US 12,207,094), asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references such as Park, GlobalPlatform, AbiChar, X9.63‑Overview, Weiss and Nix175.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00119
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 17 claims of Network‑1’s ’893 patent covering eUICC provisioning, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent
DraftKings Inc. et al. v.WinView IP Holdings, LLC
· IPR2026-00175
DraftKings has filed a petition to invalidate multiple claims of WinView’s ’189 fantasy‑sports patent, asserting that the invention is anticipated or obvious over earlier patents. The petition requests cancellation of 16 claims under §§102 and 103.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00114
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 20 claims of Network‑1’s eUICC provisioning patent, alleging obviousness over a combination of prior‑art standards and publications.
patent
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00111
Meta Platforms petitions the PTAB to invalidate SitNet’s ’815 patent covering social‑network event coordination, asserting that all 30 claims are obvious over existing social‑network and event‑planning technologies.
patent
DraftKings Inc. et al. v.WinView IP Holdings, LLC
· IPR2026-00175
DraftKings has filed an IPR petition to invalidate 16 claims of a fantasy‑sports patent owned by WinView IP Holdings, asserting that the invention is already disclosed in earlier patents and publications.
patent
Microsoft Corporation v.Sandpiper CDN, LLC
· IPR2026-00174
Microsoft has filed an IPR petition challenging Sandpiper CDN’s 9,762,692 patent covering CDN popularity‑based routing and content partitioning, asserting obviousness over Seed and Swildens references.
patent
NJOY, LLC et al. v.JUUL Labs, Inc. et al.
· IPR2026-00161
NJOY has filed an IPR petition challenging JUUL’s U.S. Pat. 12,156,533 covering nicotine‑salt e‑cigarette formulations. The petition argues anticipation under §102 and obviousness under §103 based on the Sebastian and Lechuga‑Ballesteros references.
patent
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2026-00104
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging all 30 claims of the ’183 Patent covering undelivered‑message thresholds. The petition asserts that a combination of four prior‑art references makes the claims obvious under § 103. No institution decision has been made yet.
patent
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2026-00109
Apple has filed a petition for inter‑partes review of HBCU Messaging’s ’827 patent covering random‑number‑derived message transmission. The petitioner contends the claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art messaging references and seeks cancellation of all challenged claims.
patent
Medtronic, Inc. v.Moskowitz Family LLC
· IPR2026-00163
Medtronic petitions the PTAB to invalidate a spinal‑fusion patent owned by Moskowitz Family LLC, alleging the invention was already disclosed in earlier patents by Gordon, McLuen, and Michelson. The petition raises anticipation and obviousness grounds under §§ 102 and 103(a).
patent
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2026-00107
Apple Inc. filed an IPR petition challenging all 30 claims of U.S. Patent 11,991,601, asserting that the claims are obvious over a combination of four prior‑art references covering wireless messaging. The petition seeks institution of the review and cancellation of the claims.
patent
Apple Inc. v.HBCU MESSAGING US LP
· IPR2026-00105
Apple has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 30 claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,991,600, which covers methods for selecting message bearers on mobile devices. The petition relies on obviousness grounds under 35 U.S.C. §103, combining prior art from Horvath, Tsampalis, Kansal, and Dorenbosch. No claim constructions or institution decision are present at this stage.
patent
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.SitNet, LLC
· IPR2026-00110
Meta Platforms petitions to invalidate SitNet’s ’769 patent covering situational networks, arguing all 30 claims are obvious over prior art. The petition cites multiple earlier patents and publications and seeks cancellation of the entire patent.
patent
Samsara Inc. v.Motive Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2026-00108
Samsara has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of Motive’s driver‑monitoring patent (US 12,062,243), asserting that the claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art CNN references.
patent
Google LLC v.Secure Communication Technologies, LLC
· IPR2026-00098
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 62 claims of Secure Communication Technologies' Bluetooth‑beacon patent, asserting that each claim is anticipated or obvious over Eagle, Behrens, Olkkonen, Kallio and Jones. The petition cites prior PTAB findings and collateral estoppel to bolster its request for institution.
patent
Google LLC v.Gamba Group Holdings LLC
· IPR2026-00156
Google LLC filed an IPR petition against Gamba Group Holdings LLC’s 9,772,193 patent covering Bluetooth and GPS‑based parking‑location methods. The petition asserts anticipation by Baese and Phillips and obviousness with Phillips and Soliman, seeking cancellation of claims 12, 13, and 15‑18. The Board has not yet ruled on institution.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Massively Broadband LLC
· IPR2026-00103
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent 8,224,794, which claims a wireless‑network clearinghouse system. The petitioner contends that all 32 claims are obvious in view of prior‑art references such as Dawson, Geranio, Aaron, Daley, Scherzer and Chmaytelli. No secondary considerations are offered to overcome the obviousness argument.
patent
Wybotics, Co. Ltd. et al. v.Zodiac Pool Systems LLC
· IPR2026-00160
Wybotics petitions the PTAB to invalidate key claims of Zodiac Pool Systems' pool‑cleaning robot patent, asserting that the invention is anticipated or obvious over earlier Chinese and U.S. robotic cleaning disclosures. The petition targets claims 1‑8, 11‑14, and 19 and seeks an IPR institution.
