US PTAB IP Litigation

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC

EndyMed Medical and Serendia have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 9,775,774. The parties jointly filed a motion requesting the Board terminate the proceeding before any oral hearing.

Syngenta Crop Protection AG v.Inflexion Point Technologies, LLC

· PGR2025-00045

Syngenta has filed a Post‑Grant Review petition seeking to invalidate 19 claims of U.S. Patent 12,102,027 covering a prescriptive seed‑treatment method, alleging anticipation, obviousness, and lack of enablement.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00517

Aylo Freesites requests Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR on DISH's multi‑bitrate streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the merits of the Leaning reference.

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC et al. v.Sung, Chien-Min

· IPR2024-00535

The PTAB denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00535 concerning patent 9,724,802. The order confirms that the decision stands.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00517

Aylo Freesites Ltd filed a Request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s denial of institution in IPR2024‑00517, arguing the Board misapplied the General Plastic analysis and Fintiv factors.

patent terminated or settled

ADC Solutions Auto LLC et al. v.The Noco Company

· IPR2024-00577

An email from the PTAB Director authorizes ADC Solutions Auto to submit a limited 15‑page response to Director Review requests in IPR2024-00577 and IPR2024-00671, with no new evidence permitted.

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC

The PTAB granted a settlement‑based termination for Jeisys Medical in three IPRs while allowing the proceedings to continue for EndyMed. The settlement agreement was ordered to be kept confidential.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00514

The USPTO Director denied Aylo Freesites’ request for a review of the institution decisions in multiple IPRs, including the case involving DISH Technologies’ patent 10,469,554. The denial leaves the original institution outcomes in place.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00515

Aylo Freesites Ltd seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute an IPR against DISH Technologies’ patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and failed to consider the petition’s merits.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00513

Aylo Freesites Ltd petitions the PTAB Director to overturn a discretionary denial of institution for an IPR targeting DISH's adaptive‑streaming patent. The petitioner contends the Board failed to consider the merits of its "Leaning" prior art reference and misapplied General Plastic factors.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00514

Aylo Freesites Ltd filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s denial to institute IPR2024‑00514, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and made factual errors.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00512

Aylo Freesites filed Director Review requests challenging the PTAB’s discretionary denial of institution for eight IPRs against DISH Technologies. The petitioner alleges the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and erred on material facts. The review seeks reversal of the denial.

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC

· IPR2024-00384

Jeisys Medical and Serendia have jointly filed a request with the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory confidentiality rules. The filing cites 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and related CFR provisions.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00512

Aylo Freesites seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute an IPR against DISH Technologies’ multi-bitrate streaming patent, arguing the Board misapplied General Plastic factors and ignored the merits of its petition. The petition relies on the strong prior art reference WO 02/49343 A1 (“Leaning”).

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

· IPR2024-00498

Cisco has filed a Request for Director Review seeking to overturn the PTAB’s denial of institution of an IPR on its cloud firewall patent. The petition argues the Board erred on both the combination rationale and a typographical claim‑mapping error.

AT&T Mobility LLC et al. v.Daingean Technologies Ltd.

· IPR2024-00510

Daingean Technologies Ltd. submits a preliminary response to AT&T’s IPR petition, arguing that the cited prior art (Babaei, Fwu, Lee, Agiwal) does not teach the claimed “different‑from” RNTI, common search‑space, or confirmation features of claims 2 and 4, and therefore the petition should be denied.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

· IPR2024-00497

Umbra Technologies requests a Director Review of the PTAB’s decision that invalidated its 10,630,505 patent covering end‑to‑end network tunnels. The patent owner contends the Board’s new claim construction and disregard of expert testimony were erroneous, seeking reversal and reinstatement of claims 1‑20.

patent instituted

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

· IPR2024-00497

Umbra has filed a Director Review request challenging the PTAB’s claim construction for an “end-to-end tunnel” and seeking to vacate the institution of review for Cisco’s IPR. The Board had instituted the IPR based on an obviousness finding over Hankins and Munger references.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

· IPR2024-00497

Umbra Technologies has filed a Request for Director Review, asserting that the PTAB panel’s claim construction of “end‑to‑end tunnel” is erroneous and that the institution of the IPR against Cisco’s VPN tunneling patent should be vacated.

Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.

· IPR2024-00516

The USPTO Director denied Aylo Freesites’ request for review of the PTAB’s denial to institute several IPRs, including the challenge to DISH Technologies’ patent 10,951,680. The institution decisions remain denied.

Microchip Technology, Inc. v.Aptiv Technologies AG et al.

· IPR2024-00496

The USPTO Director denied Microchip's request to review the institution denial of Aptiv's automotive electronics patent.

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC

Jeisys Medical and Serendia have filed a joint request in IPR2024-00383 to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The parties seek to have the agreement treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the patent file.

Jeisys Medical Inc. et al. v.Serendia, LLC